IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2024i2p58-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Impact on Financial Performance in Big 4 Banks in Vietnam: The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Pham Tien Manh

    (Banking Academy of Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam)

  • Quang Le Huy

    (Banking Academy of Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam)

Abstract

Multiple factors have contributed to the burgeoning emphasis on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) within the Vietnamese banking sector. There is a burgeoning consciousness among consumers and stakeholders regarding the significance of sustainable and ethical business practices. With increasing social awareness, customers are progressively opting to support businesses that are dedicated to CSR. Moreover, regulatory entities in Vietnam have initiated measures to encourage CSR practices among banks. This study underscores the profound impact of CSR on the financial performance of the banking sector. The authors developed hypotheses to find out the determinants of the financial performance of Big 4 banks in Vietnam by collecting secondary data in the 2017-2022 period. To answer this question, the Person test, Pool OLS, FEM, REM and FGLS models were used, and then the Hausman test, Wald test and Wooldridge test were used to test the suitable model. The research showed that financial performance in the Big 4 banks in Vietnam (Vietcombank, BIDV, VietinBank, and Agribank) was negatively impacted by capital ratio and financial leverage and positively and significantly influenced by corporate social responsibility and overhead expenses. Thus, by integrating CSR initiatives into their business strategies, banks can enhance their reputation, attract socially conscious customers, and improve return on assets (ROA). Overhead expenses are another key factor significantly impacting a bank's ROA. The Big 4 banks should focus on optimizing their cost structure by identifying and eliminating inefficiencies in their operations. Implementing digitalization initiatives, streamlining processes, and investing in technology can reduce overhead expenses and improve operational efficiency. From these results, the paper gave recommendations for banks to improve their financial performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Pham Tien Manh & Quang Le Huy, 2024. "Factors Impact on Financial Performance in Big 4 Banks in Vietnam: The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 2, pages 58-69, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2024:i:2:p:58-69
    DOI: 10.33146/2307-9878-2024-2(104)-58-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/1064-faktori-scho-vplivayut-na-finansovu-efektivnist-chotiroh-velikih-bankiv-v-etnamu-rol-rozkrittya-informacii-pro-korporativnu-socialnu-vidpovidalnist.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/1064/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33146/2307-9878-2024-2(104)-58-69?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Pérez & Patricia Martínez & Ignacio Rodríguez del Bosque, 2013. "The development of a stakeholder-based scale for measuring corporate social responsibility in the banking industry," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 7(3), pages 459-481, September.
    2. Carmelo Reverte, 2012. "The Impact of Better Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on the Cost of Equity Capital," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5), pages 253-272, September.
    3. Maria-Gaia Soana, 2011. "The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance in the Banking Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(1), pages 133-148, November.
    4. Elliot Boateng & Mary Amponsah & Collins Annor Baah, 2017. "Complementarity Effect of Financial Development and FDI on Investment in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Panel Data Analysis," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 29(2), pages 305-318, June.
    5. Jordi Surroca & Josep A. Tribó & Sandra Waddock, 2010. "Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 463-490, May.
    6. Portillo, Javier E. & Stinn, Joseph, 2018. "Overhead aversion: Do some types of overhead matter more than others?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 40-50.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María del Mar Miras‐Rodríguez & Amalia Carrasco‐Gallego & Bernabé Escobar‐Pérez, 2015. "Are Socially Responsible Behaviors Paid Off Equally? A Cross‐cultural Analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 237-256, July.
    2. Łukasz Matuszak & Ewa Różańska, 2019. "A Non-Linear and Disaggregated Approach to Studying the Impact of CSR on Accounting Profitability: Evidence from the Polish Banking Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Elena Platonova & Mehmet Asutay & Rob Dixon & Sabri Mohammad, 2018. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Financial Performance: Evidence from the GCC Islamic Banking Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 451-471, August.
    4. Hyunjung Choi & Doocheol Moon & Andres Guiral & Byungchul Choi, 2021. "Corporate sustainability and the market pricing of accounting numbers," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 1117-1126, May.
    5. Sadia Cheema & Bilal Afsar & Basheer M. Al‐Ghazali & Ahsen Maqsoom, 2020. "Retracted: How employee's perceived corporate social responsibility affects employee's pro‐environmental behaviour? The influence of organizational identification, corporate entrepreneurship, and envi," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 616-629, March.
    6. Pi‐Hui Ting & Hsien‐yu Yin, 2018. "How do corporate social responsibility activities affect performance? The role of excess control right," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1320-1331, November.
    7. Kuldeep Singh & Madhvendra Misra & Jitendra Yadav, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and financial inclusion: Evaluating the moderating effect of income," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(5), pages 1263-1274, July.
    8. Milind Kumar Jha & K. Rangarajan, 2020. "Analysis of corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial performance causal linkage in the Indian context," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-30, December.
    9. Anne Michaels & Michael Grüning, 2017. "Relationship of corporate social responsibility disclosure on information asymmetry and the cost of capital," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 251-274, October.
    10. Mariano González Sánchez & María Encina Morales de Vega, 2018. "Corporate reputation and firms' performance: Evidence from Spain," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1231-1245, November.
    11. Emmanuel Lawal & Gökan May & Bojan Stahl, 2017. "The Significance of Corporate Social Disclosure for High‐Tech Manufacturing Companies: Focus on Employee and Community Aspects of Sustainable Development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(4), pages 295-311, July.
    12. Hongqing He & Yameng Zhang & Yaqi Ding, 2022. "When Does CSR Fail to Incentive Employees’ Affective Organizational Commitment? Exploring the Moderating Effects Based on the C-S-R Concerns Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    13. Lin, Woon Leong & Law, Siong Hook & Ho, Jo Ann & Sambasivan, Murali, 2019. "The causality direction of the corporate social responsibility – Corporate financial performance Nexus: Application of Panel Vector Autoregression approach," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 401-418.
    14. Qianqian Hu & Tianlun Zhu & Chien-Liang Lin & Tiejun Chen & Tachia Chin, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance in China’s Manufacturing: A Global Perspective of Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Rafaela Gjergji & Luigi Vena & Salvatore Sciascia & Alessandro Cortesi, 2021. "The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosure on the cost of capital in small and medium enterprises: The role of family business status," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 683-693, January.
    16. Derek Kruse & Kristie Briggs & Eric J. Neuman, 2022. "Mitigating endogeneity in corporate social responsibility research: An investigation using a neoclassical production function," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 3-15, January.
    17. Roth, Victoria, 2021. "Talking is Silver, Doing is Gold? – The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Financial Performance," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 6(3), pages 637-672.
    18. Bertrand P. Quéré & Geneviève Nouyrigat & C. Richard Baker, 2018. "A Bi-Directional Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility Ratings and Company Financial Performance in the European Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 527-544, March.
    19. Conte, Danilo & Bussoli, Candida & Hemmings, Danial, 2024. "Responsible risk-taking and the CSP-financial performance relation in the banking sector: A mediation analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    20. Dariusz Michalski, 2024. "Operationalization of ESG-Integrated Strategy Through the Balanced Scorecard in FMCG Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-27, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2024:i:2:p:58-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhiy Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.