IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2019i3p82-94.html

Taxation of Workers in the Gig Economy: World Practice and Challenges for Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Liudmyla Kozarezenko

    (Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Iryna Tochylina

    (State educational and scientific institution 'Academy of Financial Management', Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

The gig economy is a relatively new phenomenon and is characterized by the fact that the availability and rapid spread of temporary, flexible jobs is becoming commonplace, and employers prefer hiring independent contractors and freelancers instead of full-time employees. The spread of the gig economy significantly affects the development of labor relations and relates primarily to the payment of taxes by individuals working as freelancers. Therefore, such individuals must accrue and pay taxes on their income on their own. The purpose of the article is to study the degree of influence of changes (in particular, changes related to the spread of employment through digital platforms) occurring in the labor market on the taxation and tax revenues of governments as well as provide proposals on motivating freelancers to work in the official sector, voluntary registration by payers and payment tax liabilities in full. The main trends in the labor market based on the hypothesis of the rapid growth of the gig economy in the future were considered. Based on the simulation, an assessment of the potential impact of the identified trends on tax revenues of local budgets in Ukraine was made. It was shown that the share of self-employed people in Ukraine is 15 % of the total number of employed people aged 15-70 years, which corresponds to the European trend. A comparative analysis of the tax regimes used in the world and in Ukraine regarding self-employed persons and freelancers in terms of encouraging them to pay taxes voluntarily was carried out. Suggestions were given regarding the regulation of the labor market in Ukraine and the specifics of taxation of self-employed persons in the context of the spread of the gig economy. It was substantiated that the creation of the so-called "umbrella companies", which will take on the role of employers for freelancers and freely hired workers, and will process of most documents, including those related to the payment of taxes, can have a positive effect on the completeness of taxes paid by participants of the gig economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Liudmyla Kozarezenko & Iryna Tochylina, 2019. "Taxation of Workers in the Gig Economy: World Practice and Challenges for Ukraine," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 3, pages 82-94, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2019:i:3:p:82-94
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/682-opodatkuvannya-v-umovah-ekonomiki-vilnogo-zarobitku-svitova-praktika-y-vikliki-dlya-ukraini.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/682/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katharine G. Abraham & John C. Haltiwanger & Kristin Sandusky & James R. Spletzer, 2017. "Measuring the Gig Economy: Current Knowledge and Open Issues," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring and Accounting for Innovation in the Twenty-First Century, pages 257-298, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Abi Adams & Judith Freedman & Jeremias Prassl, 2018. "Rethinking legal taxonomies for the gig economy," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 34(3), pages 475-494.
    3. Nataliya Synyutka & Anatolii Lutsyk, 2018. "Transformation of Fiscal Policy and Fiscal Space under Conditions of Digital Technologies Expansion," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 4, pages 108-113, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elena Smirnova & Igor Okhrimenko & Aleksandra Zakharova, 2024. "Review of Best Practices in Self-Employment Taxation," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 299-314, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Cesira Urzi Brancati & Annarosa Pesole & Enrique Férnandéz-Macías, 2020. "New evidence on platform workers in Europe: Results from the second COLLEEM survey," JRC Research Reports JRC118570, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Bas Scheer & Wiljan van den Berge & Maarten Goos & Alan Manning & Anna Salomons, 2022. "Alternative Work Arrangements and Worker Outcomes: Evidence from Payrolling," CPB Discussion Paper 435, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    3. Sebastian Butschek & Roberto González Amor & Patrick Kampkötter & Dirk Sliwka, 2019. "Paying Gig Workers - Evidence from a Field Experiment," CESifo Working Paper Series 7983, CESifo.
    4. Brice Corgnet & Simon Gaechter & Roberto Hernan Gonzalez, 2020. "Working Too Much for Too Little: Stochastic Rewards Cause Work Addiction," Discussion Papers 2020-03, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    5. Jose Asturias & Emin Dinlersoz & John Haltiwanger & Rebecca Hutchinson & Alyson Plumb, 2021. "Business Applications as a Leading Economic Indicator?," Working Papers 21-09, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    6. Joshua Greenstein, 2020. "The Precariat Class Structure and Income Inequality among US Workers: 1980–2018," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(3), pages 447-469, September.
    7. Sara Maric & Elke S. Schuessler & Laura Thäter, 2025. "Neither Employment nor Self‐Employment: Avenues Towards Functional Platform‐Mediated Work Systems," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 63(2), pages 287-304, June.
    8. Mossberger, Karen & LaCombe, Scott & Tolbert, Caroline J., 2022. "A new measure of digital economic activity and its impact on local opportunity," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1).
    9. John C. Haltiwanger, 2022. "Entrepreneurship during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from the Business Formation Statistics," Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 9-42.
    10. Zoltan J. Acs & Abraham K. Song & László Szerb & David B. Audretsch & Éva Komlósi, 2021. "The evolution of the global digital platform economy: 1971–2021," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1629-1659, December.
    11. Catherine Buffington & Daniel Chapman & Emin Dinlersoz & Lucia Foster & John Haltiwanger, 2021. "High Frequency Business Dynamics in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic," Working Papers 21-06, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    12. Joshua D. Gottlieb & Avi Zenilman, 2020. "When Workers Travel: Nursing Supply During COVID-19 Surges," NBER Working Papers 28240, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Christine Mayrhuber & Julia Bock-Schappelwein, 2018. "Digitalisierung und soziale Sicherheit," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 91(12), pages 891-897, December.
    14. Sung‐Hee Jeon & Huju Liu & Yuri Ostrovsky, 2021. "Measuring the gig economy in Canada using administrative data," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(4), pages 1638-1666, November.
    15. Marina Gómez García & Laura Hospido, 2022. "The challenge of measuring digital platform work," Economic Bulletin, Banco de España, issue 1/2022.
    16. Nam Kyoon N. Kim & Simon C. Parker, 0. "Entrepreneurial homeworkers," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-25.
    17. Sanjana Singh & Anshu Gupta & Richa Awasthy, 2025. "Stakeholder Interactions and the Gig Economy: Exploring Enablers and Challenges," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 14(3), pages 224-242, December.
    18. Barry, John W. & Campello, Murillo & Graham, John R. & Ma, Yueran, 2022. "Corporate flexibility in a time of crisis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(3), pages 780-806.
    19. Anat Bracha & Mary A. Burke, 2018. "The ups and downs of the gig economy, 2015–2017," Working Papers 18-12, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    20. Nam Kyoon N. Kim & Simon C. Parker, 2021. "Entrepreneurial homeworkers," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1427-1451, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • J08 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics Policies
    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2019:i:3:p:82-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhii Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.