IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jwaste/v1y2022i1p3-39d917148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges Associated with Cleaning Plastic Food Packaging for Reuse

Author

Listed:
  • Samsun Nahar

    (Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE113TU, UK)

  • Mala Sian

    (Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE113TU, UK)

  • Ryan Larder

    (Department of Materials, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Fiona L. Hatton

    (Department of Materials, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Elliot Woolley

    (Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE113TU, UK)

Abstract

Reuse of plastic packaging for food is a promising route to reduce the environmental burdens, but presents particular challenges due to the need to avoid cross-contamination of contents. This study investigates the challenges associated with cleaning and assessing existing recycled PET (rPET) food-to-go (FTG) pack forms and provides recommendations to enable a shift towards reusable food packaging systems. Pack forms were fouled under controlled conditions and washed in accordance published guidelines. Three fouling media were selected to represent food residue typically found in FTG packs. Investigated parameters included fouling type and quality, wash and rinse times, and detergent dosage. Cleanliness was assessed using adenosine triphosphate (ATP) swabbing and the effect on the material properties was studied via tensile testing, IR spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. The results demonstrate that cleaning effectiveness is dependent on the quantity of fouling, the duration of the wash cycle and the dosing of detergent indicating the potential to optimise parameters for different fouling conditions. It is also concluded that ATP testing is an inappropriate cleanliness assessment method for food packaging due to many opportunities for it to produce false negative readings, its high cost, and slow response. The rPET material properties remained largely unchanged apart from a slight increase in stiffness, however packaging suffered significant deformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Samsun Nahar & Mala Sian & Ryan Larder & Fiona L. Hatton & Elliot Woolley, 2022. "Challenges Associated with Cleaning Plastic Food Packaging for Reuse," Waste, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jwaste:v:1:y:2022:i:1:p:3-39:d:917148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2813-0391/1/1/3/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2813-0391/1/1/3/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikki Clark & Rhoda Trimingham & Garrath T. Wilson, 2020. "Incorporating Consumer Insights into the UK Food Packaging Supply Chain in the Transition to a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-33, July.
    2. Bernhard Wohner & Erik Pauer & Victoria Heinrich & Manfred Tacker, 2019. "Packaging-Related Food Losses and Waste: An Overview of Drivers and Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kayikci, Yasanur & Kazancoglu, Yigit & Gozacan-Chase, Nazlican & Lafci, Cisem & Batista, Luciano, 2022. "Assessing smart circular supply chain readiness and maturity level of small and medium-sized enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 375-392.
    2. Gudrun Obersteiner & Marta Cociancig & Sandra Luck & Johannes Mayerhofer, 2021. "Impact of Optimized Packaging on Food Waste Prevention Potential among Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Macarena Beltran & Benny Tjahjono & Anna Bogush & Jorge Julião & Evandro L. S. Teixeira, 2021. "Food Plastic Packaging Transition towards Circular Bioeconomy: A Systematic Review of Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, April.
    4. Babak Nemat & Mohammad Razzaghi & Kim Bolton & Kamran Rousta, 2023. "Design-Based Approach to Support Sorting Behavior of Food Packaging," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-32, February.
    5. Anriquez, Gustavo & Foster, William & Ortega, Jorge & Santos Rocha, Jozimo, 2021. "In search of economically significant food losses: Evidence from Tunisia and Egypt," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Pierre-Emmanuel Arduin & Doudja Saïdi Kabeche, 2022. "Dignity in Food Aid Logistics Is Also a Knowledge Management and Digital Matter: Three Inspiring Initiatives in France," Post-Print hal-04157030, HAL.
    7. Erik Pauer & Bernhard Wohner & Victoria Heinrich & Manfred Tacker, 2019. "Assessing the Environmental Sustainability of Food Packaging: An Extended Life Cycle Assessment including Packaging-Related Food Losses and Waste and Circularity Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Mao, Zhixin & Duan, Yongrui & Liu, Wenxia, 2023. "Consumers’ choice of private label considering reference price and moderating effect," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Wanjun Chu & Helén Williams & Karli Verghese & Renee Wever & Wiktoria Glad, 2020. "Tensions and Opportunities: An Activity Theory Perspective on Date and Storage Label Design through a Literature Review and Co-Creation Sessions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-37, February.
    10. Rui Jorge Carreira & José Vasconcelos Ferreira & Ana Luísa Ramos, 2023. "The Consumer’s Role in the Transition to the Circular Economy: A State of the Art Based on a SLR with Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Antonella Cammarelle & Mariarosaria Lombardi & Rosaria Viscecchia, 2021. "Packaging Innovations to Reduce Food Loss and Waste: Are Italian Manufacturers Willing to Invest?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Kabadurmus, Ozgur & Kayikci, Yaşanur & Demir, Sercan & Koc, Basar, 2023. "A data-driven decision support system with smart packaging in grocery store supply chains during outbreaks," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    13. Babak Nemat & Mohammad Razzaghi & Kim Bolton & Kamran Rousta, 2020. "The Potential of Food Packaging Attributes to Influence Consumers’ Decisions to Sort Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    14. Margot Cooreman-Algoed & Fien Minnens & Lieselot Boone & Kyara Botterman & Sue Ellen Taelman & Wim Verbeke & Brecht Devleesschauwer & Yung Hung & Jo Dewulf, 2021. "Consumer and Food Product Determinants of Food Wasting: A Case Study on Chicken Meat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Konrád Kiss & Csaba Ruszkai & Katalin Takács-György, 2019. "Examination of Short Supply Chains Based on Circular Economy and Sustainability Aspects," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-21, September.
    16. Anulipt Chandan & Michele John & Vidyasagar Potdar, 2023. "Achieving UN SDGs in Food Supply Chain Using Blockchain Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Romina Santi & Paola Garrone & Mattia Iannantuoni & Barbara Del Curto, 2022. "Sustainable Food Packaging: An Integrative Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    18. Izabela Karolina Horoś & Tonia Ruppenthal, 2021. "Avoidance of Food Waste from a Grocery Retail Store Owner’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    19. Zeng, Tian & Durif, Fabien & Robinot, Elisabeth, 2021. "Can eco-design packaging reduce consumer food waste? an experimental study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    20. Shi Qiao & Qiankun Wang, 2021. "The Effect of Relational Capital on Organizational Performance in Supply Chain: The Mediating Role of Explicit and Tacit Knowledge Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jwaste:v:1:y:2022:i:1:p:3-39:d:917148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.