IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i9p956-d78501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Social-Ecological Framework for Urban Stewardship Network Research to Promote Sustainable and Resilient Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Michele Romolini

    (Center for Urban Resilience, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA 90045, USA)

  • R. Patrick Bixler

    (RGK Center for Philanthropy and Community Service, LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

  • J. Morgan Grove

    (Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Baltimore, MD 21228, USA)

Abstract

To realize more sustainable and resilient urban social-ecological systems, there is great need for active engagement from diverse public agencies, non-profit organizations, businesses, natural resource managers, scientists, and other actors. Cities present unique challenges and opportunities for sustainability and resilience, as issues and organizations are frequently intertwined in networks of relations. Understanding and leveraging the range of knowledge types, motivations, skills, and goals of diverse participants and their networks is fundamental to sustainable and resilient cities. As efforts to examine and understand urban stewardship networks continue to emerge, it is increasingly clear that there are no structured or systematic frameworks to guide the integration of social and ecological phenomena. Such a framework could facilitate planning new urban stewardship network research, and provide a basis for comparisons among cities and their urban stewardship networks. In this paper, we develop and present a social-ecological framework for examining and understanding urban stewardship networks. To illustrate this framework and provide examples of its prospective and evaluative utility, we use examples from the U.S. Forest Service’s Stewardship Mapping (STEW-MAP) network in the United States from Baltimore, MD, USA, New York City, NY, USA, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA, and Seattle, WA, USA.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele Romolini & R. Patrick Bixler & J. Morgan Grove, 2016. "A Social-Ecological Framework for Urban Stewardship Network Research to Promote Sustainable and Resilient Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:9:p:956-:d:78501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/9/956/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/9/956/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dexter Locke & Kristen King & Erika Svendsen & Lindsay Campbell & Christopher Small & Nancy Sonti & Dana Fisher & Jacqueline Lu, 2014. "Urban environmental stewardship and changes in vegetative cover and building footprint in New York City neighborhoods (2000–2010)," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 4(3), pages 250-262, September.
    2. Mark Schneider & John Scholz & Mark Lubell & Denisa Mindruta & Matthew Edwardsen, 2003. "Building Consensual Institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 143-158, January.
    3. Connolly, James J.T. & Svendsen, Erika S. & Fisher, Dana R. & Campbell, Lindsay K., 2014. "Networked governance and the management of ecosystem services: The case of urban environmental stewardship in New York City," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 10(C), pages 187-194.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rūta Dičiūnaitė-Rauktienė & Virginija Gurskienė & Marija Burinskienė & Vida Maliene, 2018. "The Usage and Perception of Pedestrian Zones in Lithuanian Cities: Multiple Criteria and Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    2. R. Patrick Bixler & Katherine Lieberknecht & Fernanda Leite & Juliana Felkner & Michael Oden & Steven M. Richter & Samer Atshan & Alvaro Zilveti & Rachel Thomas, 2019. "An Observatory Framework for Metropolitan Change: Understanding Urban Social–Ecological–Technical Systems in Texas and Beyond," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Nany Yuliastuti & Hadi Wahyono & S. Syafrudin & S. Sariffuddin, 2017. "Dimensions of Community and Local Institutions’ Support: Towards an Eco-Village Kelurahan in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Paul Pierce & Francesca Ricciardi & Alessandro Zardini, 2017. "Smart Cities as Organizational Fields: A Framework for Mapping Sustainability-Enabling Configurations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rebecca C. Jordan & Amanda E. Sorensen & Dawn Biehler & Sacoby Wilson & Shannon LaDeau, 2019. "Citizen science and civic ecology: merging paths to stewardship," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 9(1), pages 133-143, March.
    2. John T. Scholz & Cheng‐Lung Wang, 2009. "Learning to Cooperate: Learning Networks and the Problem of Altruism," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(3), pages 572-587, July.
    3. Renata Putkowska-Smoter & Krzysztof Niedziałkowski, 2021. "Street level bureaucracy in response to environmental pressure. Insights from forestry and urban green space governance in Poland," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(5), pages 900-918, August.
    4. Connolly, James J.T. & Svendsen, Erika S. & Fisher, Dana R. & Campbell, Lindsay K., 2014. "Networked governance and the management of ecosystem services: The case of urban environmental stewardship in New York City," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 10(C), pages 187-194.
    5. Goedkoop, F. & Dijkstra, J. & Flache, A., 2022. "A social network perspective on involvement in community energy initiatives: The role of direct and extended social ties to initiators," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    6. Brian C Chaffin & Theresa M Floyd & Sandra L Albro, 2019. "Leadership in informal stormwater governance networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, October.
    7. Michal Hrivnák & Peter Moritz & Katarína Melichová & Oľga Roháčiková & Lucia Pospišová, 2021. "Designing the Participation on Local Development Planning: From Literature Review to Adaptive Framework for Practice," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, March.
    8. van den Belt, Marjan & Stevens, Sharon M., 2016. "Transformative agenda, or lost in the translation? A review of top-cited articles in the first four years of Ecosystem Services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PA), pages 60-72.
    9. Sattler, Claudia & Loft, Lasse & Mann, Carsten & Meyer, Claas, 2018. "Methods in ecosystem services governance analysis: An introduction," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PB), pages 155-168.
    10. Ibrahim, Abdul-Salam & Akanbang, Bernard A.A. & Nunbogu, Abraham Marshall & Kuusaana, Elias Danyi & Ahmed, Abubakari, 2020. "Collaborative customary land governance: Motivations and challenges of forming land management committees (LMCs) in the upper west region of Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    11. Elizabeth A. Koebele, 2021. "When multiple streams make a river: analyzing collaborative policymaking institutions using the multiple streams framework," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(3), pages 609-628, September.
    12. De la Mora-De la Mora, Gabriela & López-Miguel, Celia, 2022. "Challenges in the management of urban natural protected area systems and the conservation of ecosystem services in Guadalajara and Monterrey, Mexico," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    13. Martin, Lawrence, 2014. "The use of ecosystem services information by the U.S. national estuary programs," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 139-154.
    14. Robert Hrelja & Fredrik Pettersson & Stig Westerdahl, 2016. "The Qualities Needed for a Successful Collaboration: A Contribution to the Conceptual Understanding of Collaboration for Efficient Public Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Calin E. HINTEA & Bogdana NEAMTU & Viorel STANICA, 2019. "Metropolitan Areas In Romania – The Shift From Forced Cooperation To Collaborative Governance. A Case Study," TAD 14 The disciplines and the study of Public Administration: Transatlantic perspectives in the margin of the 14th Administration and Public Management International Conference, Bucharest, June 6-18 3, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania.
    16. Matthew L. Hamilton & Mark Lubell, 2019. "Climate change adaptation, social capital, and the performance of polycentric governance institutions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 307-326, March.
    17. Hyunsang Ha & In Won Lee & Richard C. Feiock, 2016. "Organizational Network Activities for Local Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 30(1), pages 15-31, February.
    18. Kuzdas, Christopher & Wiek, Arnim & Warner, Benjamin & Vignola, Raffaele & Morataya, Ricardo, 2015. "Integrated and Participatory Analysis of Water Governance Regimes: The Case of the Costa Rican Dry Tropics," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 254-268.
    19. Malte Möck, 2021. "Patterns of Policy Networks at the Local Level in Germany," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(4), pages 454-477, July.
    20. Federico Holm & Ramiro Berardo, 2020. "Coalitional Architecture of Climate Change Litigation Networks in the United States," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(6), pages 797-822, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:9:p:956-:d:78501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.