IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i2p190-d64218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction Waste Management Profiles, Practices, and Performance: A Cross-Jurisdictional Analysis in Four Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Vivian Wing-Yan Tam

    (School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics and Institute for Infrastructure Engineering, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Weisheng Lu

    (Department of Real Estate and Construction, Faculty of Architecture, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
    Shenzhen Institute of Research and Innovation (SIRI), The University of Hong Kong, B402, Shenzhen Virtual University Park, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518057, China)

Abstract

Construction waste management (CWM) has received worldwide attention for some time. As a result, a plethora of research, investigating a wide array of CWM issues such as their profiles, practices, and performance, has been reported in individual economies around the globe. However, a cross-jurisdictional comparison of these issues is limitedly presented in the literature despite its importance to benchmarking performance and identifying best CWM practices in the context of globalization whereby knowledge sharing has already transcended traditional country boundaries. The aim of this ex post facto research is to compare CWM profiles, practices, and performance in Australia, Europe (Europe refers to EU-27 member countries in the European Union, including Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Denmark, Great Britain, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, Greece, Austria, Finland, Sweden, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Malta, Cyprus, Bulgaria, and Romania.), Hong Kong, and the United Kingdom at a national-level, with a view to facilitating CWM knowledge sharing internationally. It does so by triangulating empirical data collected from various national statistical yearbooks with research papers and professional reports on CWM in these economies. It is found that in producing one million (US) dollars’ work, construction contributes a volume of solid waste ranging from 28 to 121 tons among countries. Conscientious CWM practices can make a significant difference in reducing, reusing, or recycling construction waste, as evident in the large variation in the CWM performance. While it might be oversimplified to conclude that the best practices in one country can be applied in another, the research provides insightful references into sharing CWM knowledge across boundaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Vivian Wing-Yan Tam & Weisheng Lu, 2016. "Construction Waste Management Profiles, Practices, and Performance: A Cross-Jurisdictional Analysis in Four Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:190-:d:64218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/2/190/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/2/190/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nevin, Rick & Jacobs, David / E. & Berg, Michael & Cohen, Jonathan, 2007. "Monetary benefits of preventing childhood lead poisoning with lead-safe window replacement," MPRA Paper 35340, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Håvard Bergsdal & Rolf André Bohne & Helge Brattebø, 2007. "Projection of Construction and Demolition Waste in Norway," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(3), pages 27-39, July.
    3. Lu, Weisheng & Tam, Vivian W.Y., 2013. "Construction waste management policies and their effectiveness in Hong Kong: A longitudinal review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 214-223.
    4. Chun-Li Peng & Domenic Scorpio & Charles Kibert, 1997. "Strategies for successful construction and demolition waste recycling operations," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 49-58.
    5. Chi Sun Poon & Ann Tit Wan Yu & Siu Ching See & Esther Cheung, 2004. "Minimizing demolition wastes in Hong Kong public housing projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(8), pages 799-805, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Larissa A. R. U. Freitas & Alessandra Magrini, 2017. "Waste Management in Industrial Construction: Investigating Contributions from Industrial Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Marta Białko & Bożena Hoła, 2021. "Identification of Methods of Reducing Construction Waste in Construction Enterprises Based on Surveys," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Inese Mavlutova & Dzintra Atstaja & Sandra Gusta & Janis Hermanis, 2023. "Management of Household-Generated Construction and Demolition Waste: Circularity Principles and the Attitude of Latvian Residents," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Jianguo Chen & Yangyue Su & Hongyun Si & Jindao Chen, 2018. "Managerial Areas of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Scientometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Salman Shooshtarian & Tayyab Maqsood & Peter SP Wong & Malik Khalfan & Rebecca J. Yang, 2021. "Extended Producer Responsibility in the Australian Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2020. "European environment policy for the circular economy: Implications for business and industry stakeholders," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1804-1812, November.
    7. Florin-Constantin Mihai, 2019. "Construction and Demolition Waste in Romania: The Route from Illegal Dumping to Building Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhikun Ding & Mengjie Shi & Chen Lu & Zezhou Wu & Dan Chong & Wenyan Gong, 2019. "Predicting Renovation Waste Generation Based on Grey System Theory: A Case Study of Shenzhen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Kien Ton Tong & Ngoc Tan Nguyen & Giang Hoang Nguyen & Tomonori Ishigaki & Ken Kawamoto, 2022. "Management Assessment and Future Projections of Construction and Demolition Waste Generation in Hai Phong City, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, August.
    3. Lu, Weisheng & Yuan, Hongping, 2010. "Exploring critical success factors for waste management in construction projects of China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 201-208.
    4. Abbate, Stefano & Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto, 2023. "From Fast to Slow: An Exploratory Analysis of Circular Business Models in the Italian Apparel Industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    5. Udawatta, Nilupa & Zuo, Jian & Chiveralls, Keri & Zillante, George, 2015. "Improving waste management in construction projects: An Australian study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 73-83.
    6. Esa, Mohd Reza & Halog, Anthony & Rigamonti, Lucia, 2017. "Strategies for minimizing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 219-229.
    7. Doussoulin, Jean Pierre & Bittencourt, Mariana, 2022. "How effective is the construction sector in promoting the circular economy in Brazil and France? : A waste input-output analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 47-58.
    8. Gi-Wook Cha & Young-Chan Kim & Hyeun Jun Moon & Won-Hwa Hong, 2017. "The Effects of Data Collection Method and Monitoring of Workers’ Behavior on the Generation of Demolition Waste," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Dong Yang & Mengyuan Dang & Lingwen Sun & Feng Han & Feng Shi & Hongbo Zhang & Hongjun Zhang, 2021. "A System Dynamics Model for Urban Residential Building Stock towards Sustainability: The Case of Jinan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Zezhou Wu & Ann T.W. Yu & Chi Sun Poon, 2020. "Promoting effective construction and demolition waste management towards sustainable development: A case study of Hong Kong," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1713-1724, November.
    11. Duan, Huabo & Wang, Jiayuan & Huang, Qifei, 2015. "Encouraging the environmentally sound management of C&D waste in China: An integrative review and research agenda," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 611-620.
    12. Dongchen Han & Mohsen Kalantari & Abbas Rajabifard, 2021. "Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Australia: A Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    13. Begum, Rawshan Ara & Siwar, Chamhuri & Pereira, Joy Jacqueline & Jaafar, Abdul Hamid, 2006. "A benefit–cost analysis on the economic feasibility of construction waste minimisation: The case of Malaysia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 86-98.
    14. Chen, Rong-Hui & Lin, Yuanhsu & Tseng, Ming-Lang, 2015. "Multicriteria analysis of sustainable development indicators in the construction minerals industry in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 123-133.
    15. Sammy Zahran & Terrence Iverson & Shawn P. McElmurry & Stephan Weiler, 2017. "The Effect of Leaded Aviation Gasoline on Blood Lead in Children," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(2), pages 575-610.
    16. Lu, Weisheng & Webster, Chris & Chen, Ke & Zhang, Xiaoling & Chen, Xi, 2017. "Computational Building Information Modelling for construction waste management: Moving from rhetoric to reality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 587-595.
    17. Filipe Almeida & Castorina S. Vieira & José Ricardo Carneiro & Maria de Lurdes Lopes, 2022. "Drawing a Path towards Circular Construction: An Approach to Engage Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, April.
    18. Luiz Maurício Maués & Norma Beltrão & Isabela Silva, 2021. "GHG Emissions Assessment of Civil Construction Waste Disposal and Transportation Process in the Eastern Amazon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, May.
    19. Animesh Ghosh & Prabha Bhola & Uthayasankar Sivarajah, 2022. "Emerging Associates of the Circular Economy: Analysing Interactions and Trends by a Mixed Methods Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-41, August.
    20. Nevin, Rick, 2010. "Energy-efficient housing stimulus that pays for itself," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 4-11, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:190-:d:64218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.