IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i2p620-d478191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extended Producer Responsibility in the Australian Construction Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Salman Shooshtarian

    (School of Property, Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Tayyab Maqsood

    (School of Property, Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Peter SP Wong

    (School of Property, Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Malik Khalfan

    (School of Property, Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Rebecca J. Yang

    (School of Property, Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

Abstract

With the COVID-19 outbreak across the world, policymakers and authorities have realised that they cannot solve the emerging issues using conventional policies and practices. COVID-19 has severely affected many industries, including construction and demolition (C&D) waste management and C&D waste resource recovery sector. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and schemes alike are policy instruments that prevent waste generation and promote a circular economy in the construction industry. These schemes are long adopted in various countries for different waste streams. EPR policy development and implementation, particularly for C&D waste, is still at an early stage in Australia. This study aims to review the Australian regulatory environment and practice to identify barriers and enablers towards successful policy development and implementation of C&D waste-related EPR. This study is based on secondary data that are publicly available. The document analysis was conducted to identify the level of regulatory and other stakeholders support in Australia. Following three rounds of examination of sources and applying multiple selection criteria, 59 different sources were reviewed in total. The results showed that there is widespread support among different stakeholders to develop EPR and expand the existing regulation to other materials. The barriers were cost and time implications for EPR policy establishment and enforcement, diversity of stakeholders involved, construction product lifecycle, responsibility of manufacturers, complexity in implantation of EPR regulations, modification inbuilt facilities and health and safety issues. Recommendations are made to alleviate these challenges. The outcome of this study could serve as a guideline for designing effective EPR policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Salman Shooshtarian & Tayyab Maqsood & Peter SP Wong & Malik Khalfan & Rebecca J. Yang, 2021. "Extended Producer Responsibility in the Australian Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:620-:d:478191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/620/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/620/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus Klausner & Chris T. Hendrickson, 2000. "Reverse-Logistics Strategy for Product Take-Back," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 156-165, June.
    2. Salman Shooshtarian & Tayyab Maqsood & Malik Khalfan & Rebecca J. Yang & Peter Wong, 2020. "Landfill Levy Imposition on Construction and Demolition Waste: Australian Stakeholders’ Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Salman Shooshtarian & Tayyab Maqsood & Peter S.P. Wong & Rebecca J. Yang & Malik Khalfan, 2020. "Review of waste strategy documents in Australia: analysis of strategies for construction and demolition waste," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(1), pages 1-21.
    4. Vivian Wing-Yan Tam & Weisheng Lu, 2016. "Construction Waste Management Profiles, Practices, and Performance: A Cross-Jurisdictional Analysis in Four Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Özdemir, Öznur & Denizel, Meltem & Guide, V. Daniel R., 2012. "Recovery decisions of a producer in a legislative disposal fee environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 293-300.
    6. Kieren Mayers & Scott Butler, 2013. "Producer Responsibility Organizations Development and Operations," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 17(2), pages 277-289, April.
    7. Fu Gu & Jianfeng Guo & Philip Hall & Xinjian Gu, 2019. "An integrated architecture for implementing extended producer responsibility in the context of Industry 4.0," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(5), pages 1458-1477, March.
    8. Savindi Caldera & Tim Ryley & Nikita Zatyko, 2020. "Enablers and Barriers for Creating a Marketplace for Construction and Demolition Waste: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Khor, Kuan Siew & Udin, Zulkifli Mohamed & Ramayah, Thurasamy & Hazen, Benjamin T., 2016. "Reverse logistics in Malaysia: The Contingent role of institutional pressure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 96-108.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcella Bernardo & Hugh Forehead & Isabella De Carvalho Vallin & Sylmara L. F. Gonçalves-Dias, 2023. "Management of Household Plastic Waste in Wollongong, Australia: The Role of Selective Waste Collection Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Ala Abdulsalam Alarood & Adamu Abubakar & Abdulrahman Alzahrani & Faisal S. Alsubaei, 2023. "Electronic Waste Collection Incentivization Scheme Based on the Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, June.
    3. Antonis A. Zorpas & Maria K. Doula & Mejdi Jeguirim, 2021. "Waste Strategies Development in the Framework of Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-5, December.
    4. Xin Zan & Deyuan Zhang, 2022. "Analysis on the Optimal Recycling Path of Chinese Lead-Acid Battery under the Extended Producer Responsibility System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Tang Seik Yng & Wong Swee Kiong, 2023. "E-Waste Management in Malaysia: Residents’ Willingness to Pay for Household E-Waste Recycling in Kuching, Sarawak," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(11), pages 1383-1401, November.
    6. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Danish Iqbal Godil & George Thomas & Muhammad Tanveer & Hafiz Muhammad Zia-ul-haq & Haider Mahmood, 2021. "The Decision-Making Analysis on End-of-Life Vehicle Recycling and Remanufacturing under Extended Producer Responsibility Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Zhen Liu & Tzuhui Wu & Fenghong Wang & Mohamed Osmani & Peter Demian, 2022. "Blockchain Enhanced Construction Waste Information Management: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-35, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pangburn, Michael S. & Stavrulaki, Euthemia, 2014. "Take back costs and product durability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 175-184.
    2. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chow, Pui-Sze & Lee, Chang Hwan & Shen, Bin, 2018. "Used intimate apparel collection programs: A game-theoretic analytical study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 44-62.
    3. Seles, Bruno Michel Roman Pais & de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes & Jabbour, Charbel José Chiappetta & Dangelico, Rosa Maria, 2016. "The green bullwhip effect, the diffusion of green supply chain practices, and institutional pressures: Evidence from the automotive sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 342-355.
    4. Pazoki, Mostafa & Zaccour, Georges, 2019. "A mechanism to promote product recovery and environmental performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 601-614.
    5. Gunasekara, Lahiru & Robb, David J. & Zhang, Abraham, 2023. "Used product acquisition, sorting and disposition for circular supply chains: Literature review and research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    6. Pazoki, Mostafa & Samarghandi, Hamed, 2020. "Take-back regulation: Remanufacturing or Eco-design?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    7. Marta Białko & Bożena Hoła, 2021. "Identification of Methods of Reducing Construction Waste in Construction Enterprises Based on Surveys," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Özden Tozanlı & Elif Kongar & Surendra M. Gupta, 2020. "Evaluation of Waste Electronic Product Trade-in Strategies in Predictive Twin Disassembly Systems in the Era of Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-33, July.
    9. Inese Mavlutova & Dzintra Atstaja & Sandra Gusta & Janis Hermanis, 2023. "Management of Household-Generated Construction and Demolition Waste: Circularity Principles and the Attitude of Latvian Residents," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Peerally, Jahan Ara & Santiago, Fernando & De Fuentes, Claudia & Moghavvemi, Sedigheh, 2022. "Towards a firm-level technological capability framework to endorse and actualize the Fourth Industrial Revolution in developing countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    11. Gu, Fu & Wang, Jiqiang & Guo, Jianfeng & Fan, Ying, 2020. "Dynamic linkages between international oil price, plastic stock index and recycle plastic markets in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 167-179.
    12. Mohsen Zamani & Mahdi Abolghasemi & Seyed Mohammad Seyed Hosseini & Mir Saman Pishvaee, 2019. "Considering pricing and uncertainty in designing a reverse logistics network," Papers 1909.11633, arXiv.org.
    13. Ivan Russo & Daniel Pellathy & Ayman Omar, 2021. "Managing Outsourced Reverse Supply Chain Operations: Middle‐Range Theory Development," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(4), pages 63-85, October.
    14. NNC Pushpamali & Duzgun Agdas & Timothy M. Rose & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Stakeholder perception of reverse logistics practices on supply chain performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 60-70, January.
    15. Cricelli, Livio & Greco, Marco & Grimaldi, Michele, 2021. "An investigation on the effect of inter-organizational collaboration on reverse logistics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    16. Wang, Jian & He, Shulin, 2023. "Government interventions in closed-loop supply chains with modularity design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    17. Syed Mithun Ali & Asraf Arafin & Md. Abdul Moktadir & Towfique Rahman & Nuzhat Zahan, 2018. "Barriers to Reverse Logistics in the Computer Supply Chain Using Interpretive Structural Model," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(1), pages 53-68, March.
    18. Liang Shen & Runjie Fan & Yuyan Wang & Zhaoqing Yu & Rongyun Tang, 2020. "Impacts of Environmental Regulation on the Green Transformation and Upgrading of Manufacturing Enterprises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Sungwook Yoon & Sukjae Jeong, 2017. "Investment Strategy in a Closed Loop Supply Chain: The Case of a Market with Competition between Two Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-32, September.
    20. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2020. "European environment policy for the circular economy: Implications for business and industry stakeholders," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1804-1812, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:620-:d:478191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.