IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i16p4326-d256503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting Renovation Waste Generation Based on Grey System Theory: A Case Study of Shenzhen

Author

Listed:
  • Zhikun Ding

    (Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
    Sino-Australia Joint Research Center in BIM and Smart Construction, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Mengjie Shi

    (Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Chen Lu

    (School of Management, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Zezhou Wu

    (Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
    Sino-Australia Joint Research Center in BIM and Smart Construction, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Dan Chong

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Wenyan Gong

    (Country Garden, Dong Guan 523777, China)

Abstract

With the rapid development of urbanization, more and more people are willing to improve their living conditions, thus substantial attention has been paid to residential renovation in China. As a result, large quantities of renovation waste are generated annually which seriously challenge sustainable urban development. To effectively manage renovation waste, accurate prediction of waste generation rates is a prerequisite. However, in the literature, few attempts have been made for predicting renovation waste as renovation activities vary significantly in different cases. This study offers an approach to estimate the amount of renovation waste based on the vacancy rate and renovation waste generation rates at a city level. The grey system theory was applied to predict the amount of renovation waste in Shenzhen. Results showed that the amount of renovation waste would reach 135,620 tons in 2023. The research findings can provide supportive information to relevant stakeholders for developing a renovation waste management framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhikun Ding & Mengjie Shi & Chen Lu & Zezhou Wu & Dan Chong & Wenyan Gong, 2019. "Predicting Renovation Waste Generation Based on Grey System Theory: A Case Study of Shenzhen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4326-:d:256503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4326/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4326/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lai Sheung Au & Seungjun Ahn & Tae Wan Kim, 2018. "System Dynamic Analysis of Impacts of Government Charges on Disposal of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Hong Kong Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Dongoun Lee & Seungho Kim & Sangyong Kim, 2016. "Development of Hybrid Model for Estimating Construction Waste for Multifamily Residential Buildings Using Artificial Neural Networks and Ant Colony Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Håvard Bergsdal & Rolf André Bohne & Helge Brattebø, 2007. "Projection of Construction and Demolition Waste in Norway," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(3), pages 27-39, July.
    4. Chun-Li Peng & Domenic Scorpio & Charles Kibert, 1997. "Strategies for successful construction and demolition waste recycling operations," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 49-58.
    5. Chi Sun Poon & Ann Tit Wan Yu & Siu Ching See & Esther Cheung, 2004. "Minimizing demolition wastes in Hong Kong public housing projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(8), pages 799-805, October.
    6. Florin-Constantin Mihai, 2019. "Construction and Demolition Waste in Romania: The Route from Illegal Dumping to Building Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Zhikun Ding & Wenyan Gong & Shenghan Li & Zezhou Wu, 2018. "System Dynamics versus Agent-Based Modeling: A Review of Complexity Simulation in Construction Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang Qiao & Doudou Liu & Xueliang Yuan & Qingsong Wang & Qiao Ma, 2020. "Generation and Prediction of Construction and Demolition Waste Using Exponential Smoothing Method: A Case Study of Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Ting Wang & Kaiyi Li & Defu Liu & Yang Yang & Dong Wu, 2022. "Estimating the Carbon Emission of Construction Waste Recycling Using Grey Model and Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study of Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-16, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vivian Wing-Yan Tam & Weisheng Lu, 2016. "Construction Waste Management Profiles, Practices, and Performance: A Cross-Jurisdictional Analysis in Four Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Kien Ton Tong & Ngoc Tan Nguyen & Giang Hoang Nguyen & Tomonori Ishigaki & Ken Kawamoto, 2022. "Management Assessment and Future Projections of Construction and Demolition Waste Generation in Hai Phong City, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, August.
    3. Liang Qiao & Doudou Liu & Xueliang Yuan & Qingsong Wang & Qiao Ma, 2020. "Generation and Prediction of Construction and Demolition Waste Using Exponential Smoothing Method: A Case Study of Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-12, June.
    4. Lu, Weisheng & Yuan, Hongping, 2010. "Exploring critical success factors for waste management in construction projects of China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 201-208.
    5. Zezhou Wu & Kaijie Yang & Xiaofan Lai & Maxwell Fordjour Antwi-Afari, 2020. "A Scientometric Review of System Dynamics Applications in Construction Management Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Zhijia You & Chen Wu & Lianqiong Zheng & Lingjun Feng, 2020. "An Informatization Scheme for Construction and Demolition Waste Supervision and Management in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Noushin Islam & Malindu Sandanayake & Shobha Muthukumaran & Dimuth Navaratna, 2024. "Review on Sustainable Construction and Demolition Waste Management—Challenges and Research Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-30, April.
    8. Abbate, Stefano & Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto, 2023. "From Fast to Slow: An Exploratory Analysis of Circular Business Models in the Italian Apparel Industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    9. Aktar, Asikha & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Harun, Mukaramah, 2022. "Energy Efficiency Policies in Malaysia: A Critical Evaluation from the Sustainable Development Perspective," OSF Preprints 9cf3a, Center for Open Science.
    10. Udawatta, Nilupa & Zuo, Jian & Chiveralls, Keri & Zillante, George, 2015. "Improving waste management in construction projects: An Australian study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 73-83.
    11. Esa, Mohd Reza & Halog, Anthony & Rigamonti, Lucia, 2017. "Strategies for minimizing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 219-229.
    12. Asmamaw A. Gebrehiwot & Leila Hashemi-Beni & Lyubov A. Kurkalova & Chyi L. Liang & Manoj K. Jha, 2022. "Using ABM to Study the Potential of Land Use Change for Mitigation of Food Deserts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.
    13. Murat Gunduz & Ayman Fahmi Naser, 2017. "Cost Based Value Stream Mapping as a Sustainable Construction Tool for Underground Pipeline Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Florin-Constantin Mihai & Ionut Minea, 2021. "Sustainable Alternative Routes versus Linear Economy and Resources Degradation in Eastern Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, September.
    15. Stephan Peter & Matthias Schirmer & Philippe Lathan & Georg Stimpfl & Bashar Ibrahim, 2022. "Performance Analysis of a Solar-Powered Multi-Purpose Supply Container," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, May.
    16. Gi-Wook Cha & Young-Chan Kim & Hyeun Jun Moon & Won-Hwa Hong, 2017. "The Effects of Data Collection Method and Monitoring of Workers’ Behavior on the Generation of Demolition Waste," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, October.
    17. Khamdamov, T., 2022. "A brief overview of the evolution of computer simulations in economic research," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 54(2), pages 189-207.
    18. Dong Yang & Mengyuan Dang & Lingwen Sun & Feng Han & Feng Shi & Hongbo Zhang & Hongjun Zhang, 2021. "A System Dynamics Model for Urban Residential Building Stock towards Sustainability: The Case of Jinan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-23, September.
    19. Yejing Zhou & Helin Liu & Jingxuan Zhou & Meng Xia, 2019. "Simulation of the Impact of Urban Forest Scale on PM 2.5 and PM 10 based on System Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, October.
    20. Dongchen Han & Mohsen Kalantari & Abbas Rajabifard, 2021. "Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Australia: A Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4326-:d:256503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.