IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i12p1221-d83633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-Event Volunteering Legacy: Did the London 2012 Games Induce a Sustainable Volunteer Engagement?

Author

Listed:
  • Niki Koutrou

    (School of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Kent, Chatham ME4 4AG, UK)

  • Athanasios (Sakis) Pappous

    (School of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Kent, Chatham ME4 4AG, UK)

  • Anna Johnson

    (School of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Kent, Chatham ME4 4AG, UK)

Abstract

The hosting of the London 2012 Olympic Games was seen as an opportunity to harness the enthusiasm of the 70,000 volunteers involved and to provide a post-event volunteer legacy. A total of 77 individuals who had acted as volunteers in London 2012 were contacted approximately four years after the Games and agreed to complete a web-based open-ended survey. The participants were asked to indicate their level of current volunteering engagement and whether volunteering at the Games had an impact on their current volunteering levels. The study found that the London Olympics were the first volunteer experience for most of the volunteers who completed the survey, with the main motivation to volunteer being anything related to the Olympic Games. Just over half of the respondents are currently volunteering. Lack of time is shown to be the main barrier towards further volunteering commitment. Only half of respondents had been contacted by a volunteering scheme after London 2012. The implications of the findings for a potential volunteering legacy are then explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Niki Koutrou & Athanasios (Sakis) Pappous & Anna Johnson, 2016. "Post-Event Volunteering Legacy: Did the London 2012 Games Induce a Sustainable Volunteer Engagement?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:12:p:1221-:d:83633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/12/1221/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/12/1221/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angela M. Benson & Tracey J. Dickson & F. Anne Terwiel & Deborah A. Blackman, 2014. "Training of Vancouver 2010 volunteers: a legacy opportunity?," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 210-226, June.
    2. Geoff Nichols & Rita Ralston, 2012. "Lessons from the Volunteering Legacy of the 2002 Commonwealth Games," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(1), pages 169-184, January.
    3. Costa, Carla A. & Chalip, Laurence & Christine Green, B. & Simes, Caet, 2006. "Reconsidering the Role of Training in Event Volunteers' Satisfaction," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 165-182, September.
    4. Minnaert, Lynn, 2012. "An Olympic legacy for all? The non-infrastructural outcomes of the Olympic Games for socially excluded groups (Atlanta 1996–Beijing 2008)," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 361-370.
    5. Alexander, Amanda & Kim, Sung-Bum & Kim, Dae-Young, 2015. "Segmenting volunteers by motivation in the 2012 London Olympic Games," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-10.
    6. Kim, Jaehoon & Kim, Sangsin, 2015. "2012년 국회법 개정의 효과 연구 [A Study on the Effect of the 2012 National Assembly Act Amendment]," KDI Research Monographs, Korea Development Institute (KDI), volume 127, number v:2015-03(k):y:2015:p:1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meehee Cho & Mark A. Bonn & Su Jin Han, 2018. "Generation Z’s Sustainable Volunteering: Motivations, Attitudes and Job Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Steven Bauer & Dongkuk Lim, 2019. "Effect of Communication Practices on Volunteer Organization Identification and Retention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Yi-De Liu, 2018. "Legacy Planning and Event Sustainability: Helsinki as the 2012 World Design Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Kristína Pompurová & Radka Marčeková & Ľubica Šebová & Jana Sokolová & Matej Žofaj, 2018. "Volunteer Tourism as a Sustainable Form of Tourism—The Case of Organized Events," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    5. Abel Meza Talavera & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi & Muammer Koç, 2019. "Sustainability in Mega-Events: Beyond Qatar 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-27, November.
    6. Hany Kim & Yeongbae Choe & Daehwan Kim & Jeongmi (Jamie) Kim, 2019. "For Sustainable Benefits and Legacies of Mega-Events: A Case Study of the 2018 PyeongChang Winter Olympics from the Perspective of the Volunteer Co-Creators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Katarzyna Pawlewicz & Adam Pawlewicz, 2020. "Interregional Diversity of Social Capital in the Context of Sustainable Development—A Case Study of Polish Voivodeships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    8. Salvador Angosto & Hyejin Bang & Gonzalo A. Bravo & Arturo Díaz-Suárez & José María López-Gullón, 2021. "Motivations and Future Intentions in Sport Event Volunteering: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wicker, Pamela, 2017. "Volunteerism and volunteer management in sport," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 325-337.
    2. Meehee Cho & Mark A. Bonn & Su Jin Han, 2018. "Generation Z’s Sustainable Volunteering: Motivations, Attitudes and Job Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Tao Ye & Xiaoyu Cheng & Wei Chen & Yanyan Li, 2022. "Volunteer Motivations in Military Sports Events: The Case of 2019 Military World Games," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    4. Niki Koutrou, 2018. "The Impact of the 2010 Women’s Rugby World Cup on Sustained Volunteering in the Rugby Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Leelanayagi Ramalingam & Juwaidah Sharifuddin & Zainal Abidin Mohamed & Fazlin Ali, 2018. "Community Garden Programme: The Volunteers’ Satisfaction," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(5), pages 436-443, May.
    6. Mateusz Rozmiarek & Joanna Poczta & Ewa Malchrowicz-Mośko, 2021. "Motivations of Sports Volunteers at the 2023 European Games in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Alexander, Amanda & Kim, Sung-Bum & Kim, Dae-Young, 2015. "Segmenting volunteers by motivation in the 2012 London Olympic Games," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-10.
    8. Getz, Donald & Page, Stephen J., 2016. "Progress and prospects for event tourism research," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 593-631.
    9. Pierpaolo D’Urso & Livia Giovanni & Marta Disegna & Riccardo Massari & Vincenzina Vitale, 2021. "A Tourist Segmentation Based on Motivation, Satisfaction and Prior Knowledge with a Socio-Economic Profiling: A Clustering Approach with Mixed Information," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 335-360, February.
    10. Baker, Bradley J. & Du, James & Sato, Mikihiro & Funk, Daniel C., 2020. "Rethinking segmentation within the psychological continuum model using Bayesian analysis," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 764-775.
    11. Heesup Han & Soyeun Lee & Sunghyup Sean Hyun, 2020. "Tourism and Altruistic Intention: Volunteer Tourism Development and Self-Interested Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Thomas Giel & Christoph Breuer, 2020. "The determinants of the intention to continue voluntary football refereeing," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 242-255, April.
    13. Salvador Angosto & Hyejin Bang & Gonzalo A. Bravo & Arturo Díaz-Suárez & José María López-Gullón, 2021. "Motivations and Future Intentions in Sport Event Volunteering: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Bomi Nomlala, 2021. "Financial Socialisation of Accounting Students in South Africa," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(2), pages 01-15, April.
    15. Jonathan Knuckey & Myunghee Kim, 2020. "The Politics of White Racial Identity and Vote Choice in the 2018 Midterm Elections," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1584-1599, July.
    16. Obi K. Echendu & Imyhamy M. Dharmadasa, 2015. "Graded-Bandgap Solar Cells Using All-Electrodeposited ZnS, CdS and CdTe Thin-Films," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-20, May.
    17. Martin Gassebner & Jerg Gutmann & Stefan Voigt, 2016. "When to expect a coup d’état? An extreme bounds analysis of coup determinants," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 293-313, December.
    18. Giuseppe A Zito & Roland Wiest & Selma Aybek, 2020. "Neural correlates of sense of agency in motor control: A neuroimaging meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Young Bum Kim & Seung Hee Lee, 2022. "Gender Differences in Correlates of Loneliness among Community-Dwelling Older Koreans," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-11, June.
    20. Fabiana R. Sousa-Mast & Arianne C. Reis & Marcelo C. Vieira & Sandro Sperandei & Luilma A. Gurgel & Uwe Pühse, 2017. "Does being an Olympic city help improve recreational resources? Examining the quality of physical activity resources in a low-income neighborhood of Rio de Janeiro," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 62(2), pages 263-268, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:12:p:1221-:d:83633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.