IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v6y2014i11p7482-7495d41604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marine Ecological Footprint of Italian Mediterranean Fisheries

Author

Listed:
  • Federica De Leo

    (Department of Management, Economics, Mathematics and Statistics, University of Salento, Via per Monteroni, Lecce 73100, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Pier Paolo Miglietta

    (Faculty of Economics, LUM University, Jean Monnet S.S. 100 km 18, Casamassima 70010, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Slađana Pavlinović

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Split, Cvite Fiskovića 5, 21000 Split, Croatia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

The capacity of marine and coastal ecosystems to sustain seafood production and consumption is seldom accounted for and is not included in the signals that guide economic development. In this article, we review estimates of marine and coastal areas aimed at sustaining catches for seafood consumption. The aim of this paper is the assessment of the interactions between the environment, intended as a set of ecological subsystems in natural equilibrium, including the marine ecosystem, and the process of fisheries systems. In particular we analyze fisheries in Italy, which is the third biggest economy and the greatest consumer of seafood in the Eurozone, conducting an in-depth analysis of the Marine Ecological Footprint (MEF) that evaluates the marine ecosystem area exploited by human populations to supply seafood and other marine products and services. The positioning of Italian fisheries shows a level of sustainability next to the threshold value. The analysis in the present study highlights the importance of absolute indicators in providing rough estimates about human dependence on ecological systems and recognizes the importance of those indicators, such as the Marine Footprint (expressed in % of Primary Production Required/Primary Production), in ensuring a high level of precision and accuracy in quantifying human activity impact on the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Federica De Leo & Pier Paolo Miglietta & Slađana Pavlinović, 2014. "Marine Ecological Footprint of Italian Mediterranean Fisheries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:11:p:7482-7495:d:41604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/11/7482/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/11/7482/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jason Venetoulis & John Talberth, 2008. "Refining the ecological footprint," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 441-469, August.
    2. Berg, Hakan & Michelsen, Petra & Troell, Max & Folke, Carl & Kautsky, Nils, 1996. "Managing aquaculture for sustainability in tropical Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 141-159, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nahieli Manjarrez-Bringas & Eugenio Alberto Aragón-Noriega & Luis Felipe Beltrán-Morales & Michael Victor Cordoba-Matson & Alfredo Ortega-Rubio, 2018. "Lessons for Sustainable Development: Marine Mammal Conservation Policies and Its Social and Economic Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Jiaxin Han & Enkhjargal Dalaibaatar, 2023. "A Study on the Influencing Factors of China’s Ecological Footprint Based on EEMD–GeoDetector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Jordi Guillen & Steven J. Holmes & Natacha Carvalho & John Casey & Hendrik Dörner & Maurizio Gibin & Alessandro Mannini & Paraskevas Vasilakopoulos & Antonella Zanzi, 2018. "A Review of the European Union Landing Obligation Focusing on Its Implications for Fisheries and the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Hidemichi Fujii & Yoshitaka Sakakura & Atsushi Hagiwara & John Bostock & Kiyoshi Soyano & Yoshiki Matsushita, 2017. "Research and Development Strategy for Fishery Technology Innovation for Sustainable Fishery Resource Management in North-East Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Pauline Deutz & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2015. "From Theory to Practice: Enhancing the Potential Policy Impact of Industrial Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yening Wang & Yuantong Jiang & Yuanmao Zheng & Haowei Wang, 2019. "Assessing the Ecological Carrying Capacity Based on Revised Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model in Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Belton, Ben & Haque, Mohammad Mahfujul & Little, David C. & Sinh, Le Xuan, 2011. "Certifying catfish in Vietnam and Bangladesh: Who will make the grade and will it matter?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 289-299, April.
    3. Xin Yang & Fan Zhang & Cheng Luo & Anlu Zhang, 2019. "Farmland Ecological Compensation Zoning and Horizontal Fiscal Payment Mechanism in Wuhan Agglomeration, China, From the Perspective of Ecological Footprint," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Ye-Ning Wang & Qiang Zhou & Hao-Wei Wang, 2020. "Assessing Ecological Carrying Capacity in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Based on a Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Shuhui Zhang & Fuquan Li & Yuke Zhou & Ziyuan Hu & Ruixin Zhang & Xiaoyu Xiang & Yali Zhang, 2022. "Using Net Primary Productivity to Characterize the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Ecological Footprint for a Resource-Based City, Panzhihua in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Thomas Kuhn & Radomir Pestow & Anja Zenker, 2018. "An Axiomatic Foundation of the Ecological Footprint," Chemnitz Economic Papers 025, Department of Economics, Chemnitz University of Technology.
    7. Mir Sayed Shah Danish & Tomonobu Senjyu & Najib Rahman Sabory & Mahdi Khosravy & Maria Luisa Grilli & Alexey Mikhaylov & Hemayatullah Majidi, 2021. "A Forefront Framework for Sustainable Aquaponics Modeling and Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Brummett, Randall E. & Williams, Meryl J., 2000. "The evolution of aquaculture in African rural and economic development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 193-203, May.
    9. Xiaoman Liu & Jingying Fu & Dong Jiang & Jianwu Luo & Chenxi Sun & Huiming Liu & Ruihong Wen & Xuefeng Wang, 2018. "Improvement of Ecological Footprint Model in National Nature Reserve Based on Net Primary Production (NPP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Tomaso Ceccarelli & Manuel Winograd & Pedro Andres Garzon Delvaux & Steven Hoek & Sergio Gomez y Paloma, 2019. "Human appropriation of net primary production of Sahel ecosystems under a changing climate to 2050: Food security and resource-use balance in the Sahel," JRC Research Reports JRC108643, Joint Research Centre.
    11. Matthew E. Hopton & Adam Berland, 2015. "Calculating Puerto Rico’s Ecological Footprint (1970–2010) Using Freely Available Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Alfalih, Abdulaziz Abdulmohsen & Hadj, Tarek Bel, 2022. "Financialization, natural resources rents and environmental sustainability dynamics in Saudi Arabia under high and low regimes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    13. Lin Zhen & Bingzhen Du, 2017. "Ecological Footprint Analysis Based on Changing Food Consumption in a Poorly Developed Area of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, August.
    14. Xiaowei Yao & Zhanqi Wang & Hongwei Zhang, 2016. "Dynamic Changes of the Ecological Footprint and Its Component Analysis Response to Land Use in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, April.
    15. Smith, Nicola J & McDonald, Garry W & Patterson, Murray G, 2020. "Biogeochemical cycling in the anthropocene: Quantifying global environment-economy exchanges," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 418(C).
    16. Thomas Kuhn & Radomir Pestow & Anja Zenker, 2019. "An Axiomatic Characterization of a Generalized Ecological Footprint," Chemnitz Economic Papers 033, Department of Economics, Chemnitz University of Technology, revised Aug 2019.
    17. Thomas Wiedmann & John Barrett, 2010. "A Review of the Ecological Footprint Indicator—Perceptions and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(6), pages 1-49, June.
    18. Mindaugas Staniunas & Marija Burinskiene & Vida Maliene, 2012. "Ecology in Urban Planning: Mitigating the Environmental Damage of Municipal Solid Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(9), pages 1-18, August.
    19. Decun Wu & Jinping Liu, 2016. "Multi-Regional Input-Output (MRIO) Study of the Provincial Ecological Footprints and Domestic Embodied Footprints Traded among China’s 30 Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-31, December.
    20. Jincheng Li & Xinyue Zhang & Xuexiu Chang & Wei Gao, 2018. "Revising Yield and Equivalence Factors of Ecological Footprints Based on Land-Use Conversion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:11:p:7482-7495:d:41604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.