IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p4186-d1649879.html

Adoption of Sustainable Beekeeping Practices Among Rural Women in Hail Region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Implications for Agricultural Extension

Author

Listed:
  • Adel Mohammad Almutlaq

    (Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Society, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohammad Shayaa Al-Shayaa

    (Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Society, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdulaziz Thabet Dabiah

    (Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Society, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Jasser Shaman Alfridi

    (Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Society, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdulmalek Naji Alsanhani

    (Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Society, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Understanding beekeepers’ satisfaction, attitudes toward extension services, and the adoption of recommended beekeeping practices could play a vital role in designing and executing effective interventions to promote the adoption of recommended beekeeping practices to improve honey production. Therefore, a study was undertaken to assess beekeepers’ satisfaction and attitudes towards extension services and the level of adoption of recommended beekeeping practices among rural women in the Hail region, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected from women beekeepers located in the Hail region, Saudi Arabia, using a simple random sampling technique with the help of a pre-tested paper-based questionnaire. The results revealed that most beekeepers were highly satisfied and showed neutral attitudes toward extension services. Despite the neutral attitudes toward extension services, a considerable portion indicated a higher adoption of recommended beekeeping practices. Moreover, rural women needed professional guidance and training for beekeeping. The beekeepers’ age showed a negatively significant correlation with the beekeepers’ satisfaction. Beekeepers’ education level showed a positively significant correlation with satisfaction. The extension services provided to beekeepers showed a negatively significant correlation with beekeepers’ attitudes. Therefore, the study suggests that training extension agents through the active involvement of the Ministry of Environment, Water, and Agriculture, should be implemented to improve beekeepers’ attitudes toward beekeeping. In addition, the government should facilitate the adoption of innovative and sustainable beekeeping practices by enhancing its availability on the market at low prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Adel Mohammad Almutlaq & Mohammad Shayaa Al-Shayaa & Abdulaziz Thabet Dabiah & Jasser Shaman Alfridi & Abdulmalek Naji Alsanhani, 2025. "Adoption of Sustainable Beekeeping Practices Among Rural Women in Hail Region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Implications for Agricultural Extension," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4186-:d:1649879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4186/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4186/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maderson, Siobhan, 2023. "Co-producing agricultural policy with beekeepers: Obstacles and opportunities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    2. Lecoutere, Els & Spielman, David J. & Van Campenhout, Bjorn, 2023. "Empowering women through targeting information or role models: Evidence from an experiment in agricultural extension in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Ahmed Herab & Ahmad Al-Ghamdi & Khodran Alzahrani & Khalid M. Elhindi & Muhammad Muddassir & Hazem S. Kassem, 2022. "A Framework for Quantifying the Strength of Partnerships between Agricultural Cooperatives and Development Actors: A Case Study in Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Girma, Jony & Gardebroek, Cornelis, 2015. "The impact of contracts on organic honey producers' incomes in southwestern Ethiopia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 259-268.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mastenbroek, Astrid, 2025. "Scaling seed demand through behavioral insights: Applying the COM-B model and behavioral change wheel to the maize seed sector in Uganda," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Galiè, Alessandra & Kramer, Berber & Spielman, David J. & Kawarazuka, Nozomi & Rietveld, Anne M. & Aju, Stellamaris, 2025. "Inclusive and gender-transformative seed systems: Concepts and applications," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    3. De, Anusha & Miehe, Caroline & Van Campenhout, Bjorn, 2024. "Gender bias in customer perceptions: The case of agro-input dealers in Uganda," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    4. Temesgen Gelata, Fikiru & Han, Jiqin & Kipkogei Limo, Shadrack, 2024. "Impact of dairy contract farming adoption on household resilience to food insecurity evidence from Ethiopia," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    5. George Malindretos & Eleni Sardianou & Maria Briana, 2023. "Farmers’ Perception on Contract Farming in the Post-COVID Era: Empirical Study in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Nhan, Tran Quoc & Gillette, Raulston & Yutaka, Tomoyuki & Can, Nguyen Duy, 2020. "Impact of Outgrower Scheme on Yield,Output Price,and Income: A Rice-Farm-Level Study in the Mekong Delta,Vietnam," Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 61(1), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Lai, Lawrence W.C., 2024. "The Credibility Thesis meeting the Coase Theorem in terms of form and function," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    8. Mingyong Hong & Shunfa Yu & Jiao Long, 2023. "Agricultural Land Rights Confirmation, Clan Network, and Farmers’ Investment in Production and Operation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Cathy Rozel Farnworth & Els Lecoutere & Alessandra Galiè & Bjorn Van Campenhout & Marlène Elias & Markus Ihalainen & Lara Roeven & Preeti Bharati & Ana Maria Paez Valencia & Mary Crossland & Barbara, 2023. "Methodologies for Researching Feminization of Agriculture: What Do They Tell Us?," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 23(3), pages 294-316, July.
    10. Abro, Zewdu & Kassie, Menale & Alebel, Haymanot & Taye, Bedaso & Ayalew, Zemen & Ayalew, Workineh, 2021. "The impact of beekeeping on household per capita income: evidence from Northwest Ethiopia," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315180, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Oladele, Oladimeji Idowu, . "Access to Livelihood Capital and Food Security Status as Correlates to Empowerment Among Women on Irrigation Schemes in North-West Province, South Africa," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 23(2).
    12. Marwa, Erick & Manda, Julius, 2021. "Do Youth Farmers Benefit from Participating in Contract Farming: Evidence from French Beans Youth Farmers in Arusha, Tanzania," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315907, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Reyna-Ramírez, Cristian Alejandro & Fuentes-Ponce, Mariela & Rossing, Walter A.H. & Groot, Jeroen C.J. & López-Ridaura, Santiago, 2025. "Experimentation and model-based re-design for sustainable intensification of mixed crop-livestock smallholder farms in the Mixteca-Oaxaqueña region, Mexico," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    14. Musinguzi, Peter & Bosselmann, Aske Skovmand & Pouliot, Mariève, 2018. "Livelihoods-conservation initiatives: Evidence of socio-economic impacts from organic honey production in Mwingi, Eastern Kenya," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 132-145.
    15. Friedson-Ridenour,Sophia & Pierotti,Rachael Susan & Springer,Emily Ann & Gebreyohannes,Alemgena, 2024. "Cultivating Collaboration through Joint Participation : Evidence from a Video-Based Nutrition-Sensitive Agricultural Extension Program in Ethiopia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10841, The World Bank.
    16. Jouzi, Zeynab & Azadi, Hossein & Taheri, Fatemeh & Zarafshani, Kiumars & Gebrehiwot, Kindeya & Van Passel, Steven & Lebailly, Philippe, 2017. "Organic Farming and Small-Scale Farmers: Main Opportunities and Challenges," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 144-154.
    17. Mehmet Selim Yıldız & Nuray Demir & Abdulbaki Bilgic & Adem Aksoy & Şaban Keskin, 2025. "Sustainable Coexistence: Wind Energy Development and Beekeeping Prosperity—A Propensity Score Matching Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-33, August.
    18. Ton, Giel & Vellema, Wytse & Desiere, Sam & Weituschat, Sophia & D’Haese, Marijke, 2016. "Effectiveness of contract farming for improving income of smallholder farmers-Preliminary results of a systematic review," 149th Seminar, October 27-28, 2016, Rennes, France 244792, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Rabia Mazhar & Hossein Azadi & Steven Van Passel & Rando Värnik & Marcin Pietrzykowski & Rytis Skominas & Zou Wei & Bi Xuehao, 2023. "Does Contract Length Matter? The Impact of Various Contract-Farming Regimes on Land-Improvement Investment and the Efficiency of Contract Farmers in Pakistan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, August.
    20. Qu, Jing & An, Xin & Feng, Bo, 2023. "Digital inclusive and rural household fertility decision-making," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PD).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4186-:d:1649879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.