IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p3865-d1642087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Lifespan of a Site Drilling Machine in Saudi Arabia and India Using Correspondence Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Salman Akhtar

    (Department of Civil Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2454, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Saad M. Al-Otaibi

    (Department of Civil Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2454, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Waleed S. Algaraawi

    (Department of Civil Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2454, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Naif M. Alsanabani

    (Department of Civil Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2454, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Khalid S. Al-Gahtani

    (Department of Civil Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2454, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdulrahman Fnais

    (Department of Civil Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2454, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The lifespan of site drilling machines is a critical factor influencing construction projects’ cost, efficiency, and safety. While previous research has identified various factors affecting machine longevity, a significant knowledge gap exists in quantifying the relative importance of these factors and their combined impact, particularly across diverse geographical regions like Saudi Arabia and India. This study addresses this gap by providing a comprehensive risk assessment of the lifespan. The research aims to identify and prioritize the most critical factors impacting lifespan and quantify their contributions to lifespan reduction using correspondence analysis (CA) and the matrix assessment method. A systematic literature review identified 30 risk factors: operational factors, environmental conditions, equipment design and quality, maintenance practices, and operator skill and training. A survey of construction professionals in Saudi Arabia and India, alongside a global perspective, provided data on the probability and impact of each factor. CA and matrix assessment methods were employed to analyze the data, revealing regional variations and commonalities. The results demonstrate that “Operator Training” is consistently a high-impact, high-probability risk across all regions. However, the relative importance of other factors, such as soil conditions and overloading, varies significantly between Saudi Arabia and India. This study introduces the integration of CA and the matrix assessment method to offer a systematic, data-driven approach to the problem. The findings provide actionable insights for construction companies, engineers, and project managers, enabling targeted risk mitigation strategies, optimized maintenance planning, and improved operator training programs. Ultimately, this research contributes to more sustainable, efficient, and cost-effective construction practices by extending the operational life of vital drilling equipment.

Suggested Citation

  • Salman Akhtar & Saad M. Al-Otaibi & Waleed S. Algaraawi & Naif M. Alsanabani & Khalid S. Al-Gahtani & Abdulrahman Fnais, 2025. "Assessment of the Lifespan of a Site Drilling Machine in Saudi Arabia and India Using Correspondence Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3865-:d:1642087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3865/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3865/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdul Azeez Erumban, 2008. "Lifetimes Of Machinery And Equipment: Evidence From Dutch Manufacturing," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 54(2), pages 237-268, June.
    2. John Sterman, 2018. "System dynamics at sixty: the path forward," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 34(1-2), pages 5-47, January.
    3. Abdelbaset S. El-Sorogy & Khaled Al-Kahtany & Talal Alharbi & Rakan Al Hawas & Naji Rikan, 2025. "Geographic Information System and Multivariate Analysis Approach for Mapping Soil Contamination and Environmental Risk Assessment in Arid Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hassan Alzahrani & Abdelbaset S. El-Sorogy & Abdulaziz G. Alghamdi & Zafer Alasmary & Thawab M. R. Albugami, 2025. "A Multivariate and Geographic-Information-System Approach to Assess Environmental and Health Hazards of Fe, Cr, Zn, Cu, and Pb in Agricultural Soils of Western Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Chen, Junjie & Liu, Pei & Lin, Borong & Zhou, Hao & Papachristos, George, 2025. "The diffusion of prefabrication technology and its potential for CO2 emissions reduction in China: A combined system dynamics and agent-based study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    3. Tsiliyannis, Christos Aristeides, 2015. "Sustainability by cyclic manufacturing: Assessment of resource preservation under uncertain growth and returns," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 155-170.
    4. Jiangbo Yu, 2022. "An elementary mechanism for simultaneously modeling discrete decisions and decision times," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 38(3), pages 215-245, July.
    5. Florian Kapmeier, 2020. "Reflections on developing a simulation model on sustainable and healthy diets for decision makers: Comment on the paper by Kopainsky," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 928-935, November.
    6. Ana Rincon-Aznar & Rebecca Riley & Garry Young, 2017. "Academic Review of Asset Lives in the UK," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 474, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    7. Guido A. Veldhuis & Dominique Blok & Maaike H.T. de Boer & Gino J. Kalkman & Roos M. Bakker & Rob P.M. van Waas, 2024. "From text to model: Leveraging natural language processing for system dynamics model development," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(3), July.
    8. Claire F. Brereton & Paul Jagals, 2021. "Applications of Systems Science to Understand and Manage Multiple Influences within Children’s Environmental Health in Least Developed Countries: A Causal Loop Diagram Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Igor Krejčí & Pavel Moulis & Jana Pitrová & Ivana Tichá & Ladislav Pilař & Jan Rydval, 2019. "Traps and Opportunities of Czech Small-Scale Beef Cattle Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-26, August.
    10. Benjamin L. Turner & Melissa Wuellner & Erin Cortus & Steven Boot Chumbley, 2022. "A multi‐university cohort model for teaching complex and interdisciplinary problem‐solving using system dynamics," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 185-199, March.
    11. Wang, Fengquan & Jiang, Jihai & Cosenz, Federico, 2025. "Understanding data-driven business model innovation in complexity: A system dynamics approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    12. George P. Richardson, 2024. "Building confidence in exploratory models," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(4), October.
    13. Eduard Romanenko & Jack Homer & Nanna Lien, 2023. "As simple as possible but not simpler: structural sensitivity testing of a dynamic model of adolescent overweight and obesity," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 39(2), pages 125-139, April.
    14. Milad Mousavian, H. & Hamed Shakouri, G. & Mashayekhi, Ali-Naghi & Kazemi, Aliyeh, 2020. "Does the short-term boost of renewable energies guarantee their stable long-term growth? Assessment of the dynamics of feed-in tariff policy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1252-1268.
    15. Wang, Lili & Szirmai, Adam, 2008. "Regional Capital Inputs in Chinese Industry and Manufacturing, 1978-2003," MERIT Working Papers 2008-028, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    16. An, Xin & Cao, Jiaxi & Ba, Junhe & Zhang, Mo, 2025. "Transition and trajectory of spatiotemporal characterization of waste photovoltaics in China: 2013–2060," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    17. Negar Darabi & Niyousha Hosseinichimeh, 2020. "System dynamics modeling in health and medicine: a systematic literature review," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(1), pages 29-73, January.
    18. Merla Kubli, 2020. "Navigating through the unknown: How conjoint analysis reduces uncertainty in energy consumer modelling," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 880-885, November.
    19. Marco Pellegrini & Cesare Saccani & Alessandro Guzzini, 2024. "Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Innovative Ejectors Plant Technology for Sediment By-Pass in Harbours and Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-28, September.
    20. Sibel Eker & Charlie Wilson & Niklas Hohne & Mark S. McCaffrey & Irene Monasterolo & Leila Niamir & Caroline Zimm, 2023. "A dynamic systems approach to harness the potential of social tipping," Papers 2309.14964, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3865-:d:1642087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.