Author
Listed:
- Mohammed Khalifa Al-Kubaisi
(Accounting & Finance Department, University of Doha for Science & Technology, Doha P.O. Box 24449, Qatar)
- Bashar Abu Khalaf
(Accounting & Finance Department, University of Doha for Science & Technology, Doha P.O. Box 24449, Qatar)
Abstract
This paper empirically investigated the impact of climate governance on the relationship between ESG reporting and firm profitability. The collected sample is all the nonfinancial companies in Europe and Gulf countries during the period 2010–2023. All the data have been gathered from Refinitiv Eikon Platform (LSEG), annual reports, and the different stock exchanges. The panel GMM regression has been used to estimate the relationship to deal with the endogeneity problem. The findings revealed that ESG, board independence, growth, inflation, and GDP had a favorable impact on company performance in Europe and the Gulf Cooperation Council, but board meetings had a negative impact. The results indicate a notable difference in the influence of board size on companies’ performance. Within the GCC framework, an enlarged board size adversely impacts profitability, potentially attributable to inefficiencies or protracted decision-making. In Europe, a larger board size positively influences outcomes, possibly due to robust regulatory frameworks, more diversity of expertise, and improved strategic oversight. The findings demonstrate that company size positively influences performance in the GCC, indicating that larger firms gain advantages from economies of scale, enhanced market positioning, and improved access to resources in the area. In Europe, firm size adversely affects performance, likely due to increased operational difficulties, legal obligations, and potential inefficiencies linked to managing huge organizations. Based on the robust results reported, our results hold.
Suggested Citation
Mohammed Khalifa Al-Kubaisi & Bashar Abu Khalaf, 2025.
"Climate Governance, ESG Reporting, and the Firm Performance: Does It Matter More for Europe or the GCC?,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-21, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3761-:d:1639502
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3761-:d:1639502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.