IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3544-d1635159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal Prediction of the Impact of Dynamic Passenger Flow at Subway Stations on the Sustainable Industrial Heritage Land Use

Author

Listed:
  • Ke Chen

    (School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, 999 Xi’an Road, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Fei Fu

    (School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, 999 Xi’an Road, Chengdu 611756, China
    Digital and Intelligent Construction Sub-Committee, Association of Sichuan Construction Science and Technology, 111 North Section 1, Second Ring Road, Chengdu 610036, China)

  • Fangzhou Tian

    (School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, 999 Xi’an Road, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Liwei Lin

    (Chenghua District Planning and Natural Resources Bureau, 33 Huatai Road, Chengdu 610052, China)

  • Can Du

    (School of Automation Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2006 Xiyuan Avenue, Chengdu 611731, China)

Abstract

Inefficient land reuse has emerged as a critical pathway for the sustainable development of urban spaces. Efficient land development in megacities’ industrial heritage areas is heavily influenced by the influx of mass passenger flows from new subway stations. To address this issue, a dynamic passenger flow-oriented land use prediction model for subway stations was developed. This model iterates a simulation model for dynamic passenger flow based on tourists and residents with an artificial neural network for land use prediction. By enhancing the kappa coefficient to 0.86, the model accurately simulated pedestrian flow density from stations to streets. Experiments were conducted to predict inefficient land use scenarios, which were then compared with the current state in national industrial heritage areas. The results demonstrated that the AnyLogic-Markov-FLUS Coupled Model outperformed expert experience in objectively assessing dynamic passenger flow impacts on the carrying capacity of old city neighborhoods during peak and off-peak periods at subway stations. This model can assist in resilient urban space planning and decision-making regarding mixed land use.

Suggested Citation

  • Ke Chen & Fei Fu & Fangzhou Tian & Liwei Lin & Can Du, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Prediction of the Impact of Dynamic Passenger Flow at Subway Stations on the Sustainable Industrial Heritage Land Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3544-:d:1635159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3544/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3544/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yaoning Yang & Juncheng Zeng & Junfeng Yin & Pengrui Wu & Genyu Xu & Chuanbao Jing & Jie Zhou & Xun Wen & Johannes Reinders & Wasita Amatyakul & Sebastian Orozco Munoz & Tao Chen, 2024. "Metro Stations as Catalysts for Land Use Patterns: Evidence from Wuhan Line 11," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-23, July.
    2. D. J. Weiss & A. Nelson & H. S. Gibson & W. Temperley & S. Peedell & A. Lieber & M. Hancher & E. Poyart & S. Belchior & N. Fullman & B. Mappin & U. Dalrymple & J. Rozier & T. C. D. Lucas & R. E. Howes, 2018. "A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015," Nature, Nature, vol. 553(7688), pages 333-336, January.
    3. Colsaet, Alice & Laurans, Yann & Levrel, Harold, 2018. "What drives land take and urban land expansion? A systematic review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 339-349.
    4. Hualin Xie, 2017. "Towards Sustainable Land Use in China: A Collection of Empirical Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-9, November.
    5. Peikun Li & Quantao Yang & Wenbo Lu, 2024. "Nonlinear Relationship of Multi-Source Land Use Features with Temporal Travel Distances at Subway Station Level: Empirical Study from Xi’an City," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Assaf, Camila & Adams, Cristina & Ferreira, Fernando Fagundes & França, Helena, 2021. "Land use and cover modeling as a tool for analyzing nature conservation policies – A case study of Juréia-Itatins," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    7. Suxiao Li & Hong Yang & Martin Lacayo & Junguo Liu & Guangchun Lei, 2018. "Impacts of Land-Use and Land-Cover Changes on Water Yield: A Case Study in Jing-Jin-Ji, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Taher Osman & Prasanna Divigalpitiya & Takafumi Arima, 2016. "Using the SLEUTH urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on land use in the Giza Governorate, Greater Cairo Metropolitan region," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 407-426, September.
    9. Pan, Haozhi & Deal, Brian & Chen, Yan & Hewings, Geoffrey, 2018. "A Reassessment of urban structure and land-use patterns: distance to CBD or network-based? — Evidence from Chicago," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 215-228.
    10. Meng Zhao & Haiyan Tong & Bo Li & Yaqiong Duan & Yubai Li & Jianpo Wang & Kexin Lei, 2022. "Analysis of Land Use Optimization of Metro Station Areas Based on Two-Way Balanced Ridership in Xi’an," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giacomo Falchetta & Nicolò Stevanato & Magda Moner-Girona & Davide Mazzoni & Emanuela Colombo & Manfred Hafner, 2020. "M-LED: Multi-sectoral Latent Electricity Demand Assessment for Energy Access Planning," Working Papers 2020.09, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    2. Junghwan Kim & Mei-Po Kwan, 2018. "Beyond Commuting: Ignoring Individuals’ Activity-Travel Patterns May Lead to Inaccurate Assessments of Their Exposure to Traffic Congestion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Andre Python & Andreas Bender & Marta Blangiardo & Janine B. Illian & Ying Lin & Baoli Liu & Tim C.D. Lucas & Siwei Tan & Yingying Wen & Davit Svanidze & Jianwei Yin, 2022. "A downscaling approach to compare COVID‐19 count data from databases aggregated at different spatial scales," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 202-218, January.
    4. Antoine Leblois, 2021. "Mitigating the impact of bad rainy seasons in poor agricultural regions to tackle deforestation," Post-Print hal-03111007, HAL.
    5. Lin Meng & Wentao Si, 2022. "The Driving Mechanism of Urban Land Expansion from 2005 to 2018: The Case of Yangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    6. De Boeck, Kim & Decouttere, Catherine & Jónasson, Jónas Oddur & Vandaele, Nico, 2022. "Vaccine supply chains in resource-limited settings: Mitigating the impact of rainy season disruptions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 300-317.
    7. Hsing-Fu Kuo & Ko-Wan Tsou, 2017. "Modeling and Simulation of the Future Impacts of Urban Land Use Change on the Natural Environment by SLEUTH and Cluster Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Thales A. P. West & Sven Wunder & Erin O. Sills & Jan Borner & Sami W. Rifai & Alexandra N. Neidermeier & Andreas Kontoleon, 2023. "Action needed to make carbon offsets from tropical forest conservation work for climate change mitigation," Papers 2301.03354, arXiv.org.
    9. Andrew Allan & Ali Soltani & Mohammad Hamed Abdi & Melika Zarei, 2022. "Driving Forces behind Land Use and Land Cover Change: A Systematic and Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Han, Bo & Jin, Xiaobin & Sun, Rui & Li, Hanbing & Liang, Xinyuan & Zhou, Yinkang, 2023. "Understanding land-use sustainability with a systematical framework: An evaluation case of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Decoville, Antoine & Feltgen, Valérie, 2023. "Clarifying the EU objective of no net land take: A necessity to avoid the cure being worse than the disease," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    12. Gaosheng Liu & Jie Pan & Yuxin Jiang & Xinquan Ye & Fan Shao, 2024. "Exploring the Effects of Urban Development in Ten Chinese Node Cities along the Belt and Road Initiative on Vegetation Net Primary Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, June.
    13. Dominguez, Alvaro, 2025. "A spatial analysis of air pollution in Japan before and after Fukushima," AGI Working Paper Series 2025-07, Asian Growth Research Institute.
    14. Yang Yang & Ruizhen He & Guohang Tian & Zhen Shi & Xinyu Wang & Albert Fekete, 2022. "Equity Study on Urban Park Accessibility Based on Improved 2SFCA Method in Zhengzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    15. J. Carl Ureta & Lucas Clay & Marzieh Motallebi & Joan Ureta, 2020. "Quantifying the Landscape’s Ecological Benefits—An Analysis of the Effect of Land Cover Change on Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Ji Han & Jiabin Liu, 2018. "Urban Spatial Interaction Analysis Using Inter-City Transport Big Data: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Shon, Huijoo, 2024. "Urbanicity and child health in 26 sub-Saharan African countries: Settlement type and its association with mortality and morbidity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    18. Barbara Kalisz & Krystyna Żuk-Gołaszewska & Wioleta Radawiec & Janusz Gołaszewski, 2023. "Land Use Indicators in the Context of Land Use Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    19. Jelena Živanović Miljković & Omiljena Dželebdžić & Nataša Čolić, 2022. "Land-Use Change Dynamics of Agricultural Land within Belgrade–Novi Sad Highway Corridor: A Spatial Planning Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, September.
    20. Santos, María Emma, 2019. "Non-monetary indicators to monitor SDG targets 1.2 and 1.4: standards, availability, comparability and quality," Estudios Estadísticos 44452, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3544-:d:1635159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.