IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3330-d1630748.html

Setting Sail for a Sustainable Growth in Small/Medium Ports

Author

Listed:
  • Ioannis Argyriou

    (Renewable and Sustainable Energy Systems Laboratory, School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, 73100 Chania, Greece)

  • Olympia Nisiforou

    (Department of Shipping, Faculty of Management and Economics, Cyprus University of Technology, 3036 Limassol, Cyprus)

  • Theocharis Tsoutsos

    (Renewable and Sustainable Energy Systems Laboratory, School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, 73100 Chania, Greece)

Abstract

Small- and medium-sized ports (SMSPs) face multifaceted challenges, including environmental pressures (pollution, resource depletion) as well as socio-economic strains (community impacts, trade dynamics). Governance complexities, regulatory fragmentation, limited funding, and stakeholder conflicts further exacerbate these challenges. This study identifies context-driven sustainability indicators for SMSPs and proposes best practices to enhance their resilience. Four small/medium-sized ports (SMSPs) in Crete, Greece—Souda (CHA), Heraklion (HER), Rethymnon (RET), and Sitia (SIT)—were evaluated to benchmark their sustainability performance using tailored indicators. The primary objectives were the following: (a) to identify sustainability indicators relevant to SMSPs, focusing on economic, environmental, and social aspects, and (b) to propose best practices for enhancing sustainability in these ports, considering their unique characteristics and constraints. A combination of the Best Worst Method (BWM) and VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) analysis was employed. The findings revealed that “environmental monitoring and management” and “security of employment and social protection” are top priorities for medium-sized ports, while “competitiveness” was a crucial indicator for small ports, emphasizing the need for financial sustainability in the context of global trade. These results offer a strategic roadmap for policymakers, guiding interventions aimed at improving the sustainability and resilience of SMSPs, thereby supporting regional economies and international trade networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioannis Argyriou & Olympia Nisiforou & Theocharis Tsoutsos, 2025. "Setting Sail for a Sustainable Growth in Small/Medium Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-26, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3330-:d:1630748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3330/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3330/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luo, Meifeng & Chen, Fuying & Zhang, Jiantong, 2022. "Relationships among port competition, cooperation and competitiveness: A literature review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-9.
    2. Bottasso, Anna & Conti, Maurizio & Ferrari, Claudio & Merk, Olaf & Tei, Alessio, 2013. "The impact of port throughput on local employment: Evidence from a panel of European regions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 32-38.
    3. Luis Fonseca & Filipe Carvalho, 2019. "The Reporting of SDGs by Quality, Environmental, and Occupational Health and Safety-Certified Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Mehrnaz Ashrafi & Tony R. Walker & Gregory M. Magnan & Michelle Adams & Michele Acciaro, 2020. "A review of corporate sustainability drivers in maritime ports: a multi-stakeholder perspective," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(8), pages 1027-1044, November.
    5. repec:hal:cesptp:hal-04046233 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Tovar, Beatriz & Hernández, Rubén & Rodríguez-Déniz, Héctor, 2015. "Container port competitiveness and connectivity: The Canary Islands main ports case," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 40-51.
    7. Elvira Haezendonck & Karel Van den Berghe, 2020. "Patterns of Circular Transition: What Is the Circular Economy Maturity of Belgian Ports?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Olympia Nisiforou & Louisa Marie Shakou & Afroditi Magou & Alexandros G. Charalambides, 2022. "A Roadmap towards the Decarbonization of Shipping: A Participatory Approach in Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-27, February.
    9. Rezaei, Jafar, 2016. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 126-130.
    10. Xue, Yuemei & Lai, Kee-hung, 2023. "Responsible shipping for sustainable development: Adoption and performance value," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 89-99.
    11. Olli-Pekka Brunila & Vappu Kunnaala-Hyrkki & Tommi Inkinen, 2023. "Sustainable small ports: performance assessment tool for management, responsibility, impact, and self-monitoring," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javier Vaca-Cabrero & Javier Domínguez Rastrojo & Nicoletta González-Cancelas & Alberto Camarero-Orive, 2025. "Enhancing Sustainability in Port Infrastructure Through Innovation: A Case Study of the Spanish Port System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Kirkels, A.F. & Liu, H. & Romijn, H.A. & Durgaprasad, S. & Polinder, H. & Goudsmit, M. & Hoorani, N., 2026. "Batteries for sustainable shipping: Current status and potential roles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 226(PB).
    3. Schulz, Veronica & Bell, Michael G.H. & Monios, Jason & Geers, D. Glenn & Zhu, Shengda, 2025. "Recycling ships, revitalising ports: Assessing the economic viability of diversifying coal ports with ship recycling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. César Ducruet, 2020. "The geography of maritime networks: A critical review," Post-Print halshs-02922543, HAL.
    5. Ducruet, César, 2020. "The geography of maritime networks: A critical review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    6. Deng, Ping & Song, Lian & Xiao, Ruiqi & Huang, Chengfeng, 2022. "Evaluation of logistics and port connectivity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 249-267.
    7. Guo, Jianke & Wang, Ziqi & Yu, Xuhui, 2022. "Accessibility measurement of China's coastal ports from a land-sea coordination perspective - An empirical study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    8. James J. H. Liou & Perry C. Y. Liu & Huai-Wei Lo, 2020. "A Failure Mode Assessment Model Based on Neutrosophic Logic for Switched-Mode Power Supply Risk Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Renata Machado de Andrade & Suhyung Lee & Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Oh Kyoung Kwon & Hye Min Chung, 2019. "Port Efficiency Incorporating Service Measurement Variables by the BiO-MCDEA: Brazilian Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Bottasso, Anna & Conti, Maurizio & Ferrari, Claudio & Tei, Alessio, 2014. "Ports and regional development: A spatial analysis on a panel of European regions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 44-55.
    11. Chandra Prakash Garg & Vishal Kashav & Xuemuge Wang, 2023. "Evaluating sustainability factors of green ports in China under fuzzy environment," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7795-7821, August.
    12. Kevin X. Li & Tae-Joon Park & Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Heather McLaughlin & Wenming Shi, 2018. "Container Transport Network for Sustainable Development in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Liang, Fuqi & Brunelli, Matteo & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    14. Salimi, Negin & Rezaei, Jafar, 2018. "Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 147-155.
    15. da Silva, Agostinho & Almeida, Isabel, 2020. "Towards INDUSTRY 4.0 | a case STUDY in ornamental stone sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. Wu, Zhen & Woo, Su-Han & Lai, Po-Lin & Chen, Xiaoyi, 2022. "The economic impact of inland ports on regional development: Evidence from the Yangtze River region," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 80-91.
    17. Laima Gerlitz & Christopher Meyer, 2021. "Small and Medium-Sized Ports in the TEN-T Network and Nexus of Europe’s Twin Transition: The Way towards Sustainable and Digital Port Service Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, April.
    18. Ravindra Singh Saluja & Varinder Singh, 2023. "Attribute-based characterization, coding, and selection of joining processes using a novel MADM approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(2), pages 616-655, June.
    19. Tariq Elrazaz & Ahmed Shaker Samaan & Moataz Elmassri, 2024. "Sustainable development goals: Sustainability reporting challenges in the United Arab Emirates context," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3100-3114, August.
    20. Mari-Liis Tombak & Deniece Melissa Aiken & Eliise Toomeoja & Ulla Pirita Tapaninen, 2025. "Advancing Port Sustainability in the Baltic Sea Region: A Comparative Analysis Using the SMCC Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-24, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3330-:d:1630748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.