IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3145-d1626502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effectiveness and Sustainability of Tier Diagnostic Technologies for Misconception Detection in Science Education: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Huangdong Ma

    (School of Teacher Development, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710000, China
    Shaanxi Institute of Teacher Development, Xi’an 710000, China)

  • Hongbin Yang

    (Faculty of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710000, China
    Chongqing Academy of Education Science, Chongqing 400000, China)

  • Chen Li

    (College of Life Sciences, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750000, China)

  • Shiwen Ma

    (School of Teacher Development, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710000, China
    Shaanxi Institute of Teacher Development, Xi’an 710000, China)

  • Gaofeng Li

    (College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710000, China)

Abstract

The rapid development of science and technology has made scientific literacy a key focus in education, with scientific concepts considered central to the development of citizens’ literacy. However, misconceptions hinder the improvement of students’ scientific literacy. Misconception tier diagnostic technologies (MTDTs) provide an effective means for assessing the depth of students’ understanding of concepts. This paper provides a systematic review of research on MTDTs from 1985 to 2024. Following PRISMA standards, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases. The screening process is described in detail, and the selection steps are visually presented. A total of 28 studies were selected, analyzing the development history, effectiveness, and practical application of this technology across various scientific domains. The results show that MTDTs have undergone rigorous reliability and validity assessments, demonstrating high quality. Four-tier diagnostic technology is regarded as the most accurate method for identifying misconceptions. This technology is most widely applied in physics and biology, with relatively fewer applications in geography. Moreover, MTDTs are more commonly used in high school and higher education but are underused in primary education. With ongoing technological advancements, MTDTs are transitioning toward large-scale online applications. The study also reveals that misconceptions are prevalent among students across various educational stages and subjects. However, interventions targeting these misconceptions lack effective validation and systematic empirical research. Future research should focus on these findings to provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the sustainable development of education and student literacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Huangdong Ma & Hongbin Yang & Chen Li & Shiwen Ma & Gaofeng Li, 2025. "The Effectiveness and Sustainability of Tier Diagnostic Technologies for Misconception Detection in Science Education: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-28, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3145-:d:1626502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3145/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3145/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vasiliki Kioupi & Nikolaos Voulvoulis, 2019. "Education for Sustainable Development: A Systemic Framework for Connecting the SDGs to Educational Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Cristina Viehmann & Juan Manuel Fernández Cárdenas & Cristina Gehibie Reynaga Peña, 2024. "The Use of Socioscientific Issues in Science Lessons: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-29, July.
    3. Nuria Fernández-Huetos & José Manuel Pérez-Martín & Irene Guevara-Herrero & Tamara Esquivel-Martín, 2025. "Primary-Education Students’ Performance in Arguing About a Socioscientific Issue: The Case of Pharmaceuticals in Surface Water," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Irene Guevara-Herrero & Beatriz Bravo-Torija & José Manuel Pérez-Martín, 2024. "Educational Practice in Education for Environmental Justice: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Oswaldo Maillard & Gilka Michme & Huascar Azurduy & Roberto Vides-Almonacid, 2024. "Citizen Science for Environmental Monitoring in the Eastern Region of Bolivia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    6. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    7. Alicia Giner-Baixauli & Hugo Corbí & Olga Mayoral, 2024. "Exploring the Intersection of Paleontology and Sustainability: Enhancing Scientific Literacy in Spanish Secondary School Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Méndez & Miriam Méndez & Juana María Anguita, 2022. "Digital Teaching Competence in Teacher Training as an Element to Attain SDG 4 of the 2030 Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Manuela Lucchese & Ferdinando Di Carlo & Natalia Aversano & Giuseppe Sannino & Paolo Tartaglia Polcini, 2022. "Gender Reporting Guidelines in Italian Public Universities for Assessing SDG 5 in the International Context," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Stanislav Avsec & Vesna Ferk Savec, 2021. "Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of, and Experiences with, Technology-Enhanced Transformative Learning towards Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-28, September.
    4. Paulina Schiappacasse & Bernhard Müller & Le Thuy Linh, 2019. "Towards Responsible Aggregate Mining in Vietnam," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Pina Puntillo, 2023. "Circular economy business models: Towards achieving sustainable development goals in the waste management sector—Empirical evidence and theoretical implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 941-954, March.
    6. Schlör, Holger & Venghaus, Sandra & Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich, 2018. "The FEW-Nexus city index – Measuring urban resilience," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 382-392.
    7. Jean-Louis Combes & Alexandru Minea & Pegdéwendé Nestor Sawadogo, 2019. "Assessing the effects of combating illicit financial flows on domestic tax revenue mobilization in developing countries," CERDI Working papers halshs-02019073, HAL.
    8. Nelson, Ewan & Warren, Peter, 2020. "UK transport decoupling: On track for clean growth in transport?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 39-51.
    9. Ibrahim Ari & Muammer Koc, 2018. "Sustainable Financing for Sustainable Development: Understanding the Interrelations between Public Investment and Sovereign Debt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    10. R. Ebrahimi & S. Choobchian & H. Farhadian & I. Goli & E. Farmandeh & H. Azadi, 2022. "Investigating the effect of vocational education and training on rural women’s empowerment," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Lampros Lamprinidis, 2025. "Socially Responsible Public Procurement and the Social Economy: European and Global Institutional Approaches," Journal of Public Policy and Administration, IPRJB, vol. 10(1), pages 46-62.
    12. Benjamin Nölting & Bettina König & Anne B. Zimmermann & Antonietta Di Giulio & Martina Schäfer & Flurina Schneider, 2022. "Dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic: an opportunity to reflect on sustainability research," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 11-27, December.
    13. Nakakawa, Frances & Mugisha, Johnny & Kaaya, Archileo N. & Tumwesigye, Nazarius M. & Hennessey, Martina, 2024. "Nutrition education effects on food and nutrition security for women living with HIV/AIDS in Uganda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    14. Rashmi Jaipal, 2017. "Psychology at the Crossroads," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 29(2), pages 125-159, September.
    15. Bárbara Galleli & Elder Semprebon & Joyce Aparecida Ramos dos Santos & Noah Emanuel Brito Teles & Mateus Santos de Freitas-Martins & Raquel Teodoro da Silva Onevetch, 2021. "Institutional Pressures, Sustainable Development Goals and COVID-19: How Are Organisations Engaging?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Sagarika Dey & Priyanka Devi, 2019. "Impact of TVET on Labour Market Outcomes and Women’s Empowerment in Rural Areas: A Case Study from Cachar District, Assam," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 13(3), pages 357-371, December.
    17. Rostami-Tabar, Bahman & Ali, Mohammad M. & Hong, Tao & Hyndman, Rob J. & Porter, Michael D. & Syntetos, Aris, 2022. "Forecasting for social good," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1245-1257.
    18. Maria Sassi, 2020. "A SEM Approach to the Direct and Indirect Links between WaSH Services and Access to Food in Countries in Protracted Crises: The Case of Western Bahr-el-Ghazal State, South Sudan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-13, November.
    19. Mohammed Abdullatif Almulla & Mahdi Mohammed Alamri, 2021. "Using Conceptual Mapping for Learning to Affect Students’ Motivation and Academic Achievement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Seebacher, Moritz, 2023. "Pathways to progress: The complementarity of bicycles and road infrastructure for girls’ education," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3145-:d:1626502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.