IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p1960-d1599189.html

Industrial Robotics, Resource Efficiency, Energy Transition, and Environmental Quality: Designing a Sustainable Development Goals Framework for G7 Countries in the Presence of Geopolitical Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Yuhan Xia

    (School of Marxism, Xidian University, Xi’an 710000, China)

  • Mahmood Ahmad

    (Advanced Research Centre, European University of Lefke, Lefke, Northern Cyprus, TR-10, Mersin 99010, Turkey
    Applied Science Research Center, Applied Science Private University, Amman 11937, Jordan)

Abstract

In recent years, the integration of industrial robotics has emerged as a powerful tool in reshaping industries by enhancing production efficiency, reducing waste generation, and optimizing resource utilization. However, industrial robotics, particularly in manufacturing and production, require significant energy that can potentially impact on environmental quality. Despite the growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI)-based industrial robotics, there is a paucity of literature on the impact of industrial robotics on the ecological footprint (EF), particularly in the context of advanced economies. In this context, this study aims to investigate the impact of industrial robotics, resource efficiency, energy transition, and geopolitical risk EF in G7 countries from 1993 to 2021. The study employed advanced econometric techniques, including Kernel-based Regularized Least Squares (KRLS) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) machine learning methods. The results unveiled that industrial robotics significantly curtail environmental degradation by impeding the EF. Resource efficiency and energy transition posed a significant and negative impact on the EF. Geopolitical risks and economic growth exacerbate the EF. Based on the results, the study proposes important policy implications for achieving sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuhan Xia & Mahmood Ahmad, 2025. "Industrial Robotics, Resource Efficiency, Energy Transition, and Environmental Quality: Designing a Sustainable Development Goals Framework for G7 Countries in the Presence of Geopolitical Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1960-:d:1599189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1960/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1960/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Xueyang & Sun, Xiumei & Ahmad, Mahmood & Chen, Jiawei, 2024. "Energy transition, ecological governance, globalization, and environmental sustainability: Insights from the top ten emitting countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    2. Huang, Geng & He, Ling-Yun & Lin, Xi, 2022. "Robot adoption and energy performance: Evidence from Chinese industrial firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    3. Wang, Wen & Niu, Yanfang & Gapich, Alexander & Strielkowski, Wadim, 2023. "Natural resources extractions and carbon neutrality: The role of geopolitical risk," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Zhang, Hui & Fahlevi, Mochammad & Aljuaid, Mohammed & Beşer, Nazife Özge & Cabas, Meral & lominchar, Jose, 2024. "A machine learning and quantile analysis of FINTECH and resource efficiency in achieving sustainable development in OECD countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Dario Caldara & Matteo Iacoviello, 2022. "Measuring Geopolitical Risk," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(4), pages 1194-1225, April.
    6. Su, Chi-Wei & Khan, Khalid & Umar, Muhammad & Zhang, Weike, 2021. "Does renewable energy redefine geopolitical risks?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Hashem Pesaran, M. & Yamagata, Takashi, 2008. "Testing slope homogeneity in large panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 50-93, January.
    8. Dervis Kirikkaleli & Minhaj Ali, 2024. "Resource efficiency, energy productivity, and environmental sustainability in Germany," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 13139-13158, May.
    9. Afshan, Sahar & Ozturk, Ilhan & Yaqoob, Tanzeela, 2022. "Facilitating renewable energy transition, ecological innovations and stringent environmental policies to improve ecological sustainability: Evidence from MM-QR method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 151-160.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuai Zhao & Muhammad Adil Javed & Xinxiang Gao, 2026. "Driving tourism growth through AI adoption in G-7 economies: a quantile regression approach," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 1-24, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khalid Khan & Adnan Khurshid & Javier Cifuentes-Faura, 2025. "Impact of Defence Expenditure on Total Factor Productivity: New Insights from Panel Bootstrap Granger Causality," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 493-508, May.
    2. Khan, Khalid & Khurshid, Adnan & Cifuentes-Faura, Javier, 2023. "Investigating the relationship between geopolitical risks and economic security: Empirical evidence from central and Eastern European countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    3. Ulug, Mehmet & Andrei, Roxana, 2025. "Energy transition under twin shocks: Geopolitical and macrofinancial risks," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    4. Satar Bakhsh & Md Shabbir Alam & Wei Zhang, 2024. "Green finance and Sustainable Development Goals: is there a role for geopolitical uncertainty?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1-30, August.
    5. Uche, Emmanuel & Ngepah, Nicholas & Onwe, Joshua Chukwuma & Zaman, Umer & Odhiambo, Nicholas M., 2024. "A question for sustainable development goal 10: How relevant is innovation patenting receipts to income distributions?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    6. Chen, Zhuoyi & Liu, Yuanyuan & Zhang, Hongwei, 2024. "Can geopolitical risks impact the long-run correlation between crude oil and clean energy markets? Evidence from a regime-switching analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    7. Cui, Xin & Wen, Lulu & Wang, Chunfeng & Fang, Zhenming & Yao, Shouyu, 2025. "Innovating under pressure: How geopolitical risk exposure drives energy innovation in firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    8. Mariev, Oleg & Sohag, Kazi & Islam, Md. Monirul, 2026. "Lithium import demand and electric vehicle market growth in Europe: Perspectives on economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical turbulence," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    9. Wang, Xinya & Rong, Xueyun & Yin, Lei, 2024. "Discerning the impact of global geopolitical risks on China's energy futures market spillovers: Evidence from higher-order moments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    10. Ahmed, Walid M.A. & Sleem, Mohamed A.E., 2025. "On the dynamic interdependence between risk factors and clean energy stock prices," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    11. Yu Wang & Xudong Chen & Ridwan Lanre Ibrahim & Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al‐Faryan, 2025. "Unveiling the criticality of digitalization, eco‐innovation, carbon tax, and environmental regulation in G7 quest for carbon footprint mitigation: Insights for sustainable development," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(2), pages 1284-1307, May.
    12. Wei Wu & John Adam, 2026. "Is Innovation the Silver Bullet for Sustainability? Only Under Strong Governance: Evidence From the G20," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 2409-2426, April.
    13. Islam, Md. Monirul, 2025. "US-China bi-lateral mineral trade and energy transition in the landscape of global value chain pressures, geo-economic fragmentation and US-China geopolitical risks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 399(C).
    14. Liu, Jiahao & Zhu, Bo & Hu, Xin, 2024. "Systemic risk spillovers among global energy firms: Does geopolitical risk matter?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    15. Lei, Xiying & Alharthi, Majed & Ahmad, Ishtiaq & Aziz, Babar & Abdin, Zain ul, 2022. "Importance of international relations for the promotion of renewable energy, preservation of natural resources and environment: Empirics from SEA nations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1250-1257.
    16. Riti, Joshua Sunday & Shu, Yang & Riti, Miriam-Kamah J., 2022. "Geopolitical risk and environmental degradation in BRICS: Aggregation bias and policy inference," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    17. Su, Chi-Wei & Yang, Shengyao & Dumitrescu Peculea, Adelina & Ioana Biţoiu, Teodora & Qin, Meng, 2024. "Energy imports in turbulent eras: Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    18. Liu, Yue & Lin, Zijie, 2024. "Impact of regional trade integration and energy transition on natural resources footprints in Asian Countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    19. Lu, Chengwu & Zafar, Muhammad Wasif & Cevik, Emrah I. & Destek, Mehmet Akif & Bugan, Mehmet Fatih, 2023. "Time and quantile domain connectedness between the geopolitical risk of China and precious metals markets," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    20. Ahmad, Mahmood & Peng, Tao & Awan, Ashar & Ahmed, Zahoor, 2023. "Policy framework considering resource curse, renewable energy transition, and institutional issues: Fostering sustainable development and sustainable natural resource consumption practices," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1960-:d:1599189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.