IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p1850-d1596970.html

Geoenvironmental Engineered Structures for Water Protection: Challenges and Perspectives for Sustainable Liners

Author

Listed:
  • Leonardo Marchiori

    (GeoBioTec, Civil Engineering and Architecture Department, University Beira Interior, Calçada Fonte do Lameiro 6, 6200-358 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Antonio Albuquerque

    (GeoBioTec, Civil Engineering and Architecture Department, University Beira Interior, Calçada Fonte do Lameiro 6, 6200-358 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Luis Andrade Pais

    (GeoBioTec, Civil Engineering and Architecture Department, University Beira Interior, Calçada Fonte do Lameiro 6, 6200-358 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Maria Eugênia Gimenez Boscov

    (Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Department, University of São Paulo, Avenida Trabalhador São-Carlense 400, São Carlos 13566-590, SP, Brazil)

  • Victor Cavaleiro

    (GeoBioTec, Civil Engineering and Architecture Department, University Beira Interior, Calçada Fonte do Lameiro 6, 6200-358 Covilhã, Portugal)

Abstract

Geoenvironmental engineered barriers, such as geotechnical and hydraulic layered structures called liners, are essential for protecting the environment from pollution. Liners are usually compacted clay liners (CCL), geomembranes (GM), geosynthetic clay liners (GCL), or a combination of these liners (composite liners), which require significant attention concerning materials, techniques, and procedures to perform adequately. This work reviews the function of geotechnical and hydraulic barriers as liners and highlights the lack of investigation and problematic aspects of them. In addition, the work provides an overview of the literature around earthworks which are liners’ specific configurations, such as landfills, dams, ponds, wastewater lagoons, and vertical barriers. Furthermore, the main investigations, issues, and perspectives are demonstrated, and are discussed alongside the trending research areas and sustainable new materials. This work highlights different directives in several countries for liner construction standards and testing program specifications, analyzing their economic aspects. The main studies on the subject have been compiled, and a bibliometric analysis was performed. Thus, this paper concludes by pointing out gaps in the research regarding alternative materials and structures within geoenvironmental investigations on liners, and signposts future scientific threads related to sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonardo Marchiori & Antonio Albuquerque & Luis Andrade Pais & Maria Eugênia Gimenez Boscov & Victor Cavaleiro, 2025. "Geoenvironmental Engineered Structures for Water Protection: Challenges and Perspectives for Sustainable Liners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-32, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1850-:d:1596970
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1850/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1850/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Chabuk & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Mohammad Ezz-Aldeen & Jan Laue & Roland Pusch & Hussain Musa Hussain & Sven Knutsson, 2018. "Two Scenarios for Landfills Design in Special Conditions Using the HELP Model: A Case Study in Babylon Governorate, Iraq," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Francisco M. Baena-Moreno & Isabel Malico & Isabel Paula Marques, 2021. "Promoting Sustainability: Wastewater Treatment Plants as a Source of Biomethane in Regions Far from a High-Pressure Grid. A Real Portuguese Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Lin, Long & Xu, Fuqing & Ge, Xumeng & Li, Yebo, 2018. "Improving the sustainability of organic waste management practices in the food-energy-water nexus: A comparative review of anaerobic digestion and composting," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 151-167.
    4. Steffen Beck-Broichsitter & Horst H. Gerke & Rainer Horn, 2018. "Shrinkage Characteristics of Boulder Marl as Sustainable Mineral Liner Material for Landfill Capping Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Hao Li & Jinbang Zhang & Juan Hou, 2023. "Pore Scale Simulation of Rheology Properties on Residence Time of Polymer Hydrogel and Hydraulic Conductivity of Bentonite Polymer Composite Geosynthetic Clay Liners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qi, Chuanren & Cao, Dingge & Gao, Xingzu & Jia, Sumeng & Yin, Rongrong & Nghiem, Long D. & Li, Guoxue & Luo, Wenhai, 2023. "Optimising organic composition of feedstock to improve microbial dynamics and symbiosis to advance solid-state anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and organic waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    2. Mariano Gallo, 2019. "An Optimisation Model to Consider the NIMBY Syndrome within the Landfill Siting Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Marcin K. Widomski & Anna Musz-Pomorska & Wojciech Franus, 2021. "Hydraulic and Swell–Shrink Characteristics of Clay and Recycled Zeolite Mixtures for Liner Construction in Sustainable Waste Landfill," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Meng, Xingyao & Wang, Qingping & Zhao, Xixi & Cai, Yafan & Ma, Xuguang & Fu, Jingyi & Wang, Pan & Wang, Yongjing & Liu, Wei & Ren, Lianhai, 2023. "A review of the technologies used for preserving anaerobic digestion inoculum," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Estévez, Sofía & Rebolledo-Leiva, Ricardo & Hernández, Diógenes & González-García, Sara & Feijoo, Gumersindo & Moreira, María Teresa, 2023. "Benchmarking composting, anaerobic digestion and dark fermentation for apple vinasse management as a strategy for sustainable energy production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    6. Deng, Yawen & Ng Tsan Sheng, Adam & Xu, Jiuping, 2023. "Authority-enterprise equilibrium based mixed subsidy mechanism for the value-added treatment of food waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    7. Arunthathi Sendilvadivelu & Balaji Dhandapani & Sivapriya Vijayasimhan & Surya Prakash Pauldurai Kalaiselvi, 2025. "Sustainable Stabilization of Clay Soil Using Lime and Oryza sativa -Waste-Derived Dried Solid Digestate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-22, September.
    8. Kumar, Atul & Samadder, S.R., 2020. "Performance evaluation of anaerobic digestion technology for energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    9. Wang, Xue-Chao & Jiang, Peng & Yang, Lan & Fan, Yee Van & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Wang, Yutao, 2021. "Extended water-energy nexus contribution to environmentally-related sustainable development goals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    10. Jiang, Y. & Xie, S.H. & Dennehy, C. & Lawlor, P.G. & Hu, Z.H. & Wu, G.X. & Zhan, X.M. & Gardiner, G.E., 2020. "Inactivation of pathogens in anaerobic digestion systems for converting biowastes to bioenergy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    11. Shumal, Mohammad & Taghipour Jahromi, Ahmad Reza & Ferdowsi, Ali & Mehdi Noorbakhsh Dehkordi, Seyed Mohammad & Moloudian, Amin & Dehnavi, Ali, 2020. "Comprehensive analysis of municipal solid waste rejected fractions as a source of Refused Derived Fuel in developing countries (case study of Isfahan- Iran): Environmental Impact and sustainable development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 404-413.
    12. Wang, Chenxuan & Li, Zhiwei & Tan, Raymond R. & Aviso, Kathleen B. & Wang, Fang & Jia, Xiaoping, 2024. "Feasibility analysis for bio-natural gas generated from high-concentration organic wastewater," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    13. Prakash Kumar Sarangi & Rajesh Kumar Srivastava & Akhilesh Kumar Singh & Uttam Kumar Sahoo & Piotr Prus & Roman Sass, 2023. "Municipal-Based Biowaste Conversion for Developing and Promoting Renewable Energy in Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-28, August.
    14. Xu, Fuqing & Okopi, Solomon Inalegwu & Jiang, Yongmei & Chen, Zhou & Meng, Liyun & Li, Yebo & Sun, Weimin & Li, Chaokun, 2022. "Multi-criteria assessment of food waste and waste paper anaerobic co-digestion: Effects of inoculation ratio, total solids content, and feedstock composition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 40-50.
    15. Lei Zheng & Jingang Chen & Mingyue Zhao & Shikun Cheng & Li-Pang Wang & Heinz-Peter Mang & Zifu Li, 2020. "What Could China Give to and Take from Other Countries in Terms of the Development of the Biogas Industry?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    16. Akinola David Olugbemide & Ana Oberlintner & Uroš Novak & Blaž Likozar, 2021. "Lignocellulosic Corn Stover Biomass Pre-Treatment by Deep Eutectic Solvents (DES) for Biomethane Production Process by Bioresource Anaerobic Digestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-13, September.
    17. Idiano D’Adamo & Claudio Sassanelli, 2022. "Biomethane Community: A Research Agenda towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.
    18. Jaroslav Demko & Ján Machava, 2022. "Tree Resin, a Macroergic Source of Energy, a Possible Tool to Lower the Rise in Atmospheric CO 2 Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Yue Jiang & Yue Zhang & Hong Li, 2023. "Research Progress and Analysis on Comprehensive Utilization of Livestock and Poultry Biogas Slurry as Agricultural Resources," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Wainaina, Steven & Rajendran, Karthik & Kumar, Sumit & Quan, Wang & Duan, Yumin & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Chen, Hongyu & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang , 2019. "A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 115-131.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1850-:d:1596970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.