IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1716-d1594150.html

Sustainable Innovation Management Model (MGI) for Plantain Agroindustrial Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Jhon Wilder Zartha Sossa

    (School of Engineering, Faculty of Agroindustrial Engineering, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, Colombia)

  • Nolberto Gutiérrez Posada

    (Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Alexander Von Humboldt Business University Corporation, Armenia 630001, Colombia)

  • Adriana María Zuluaga Monsalve

    (Research Department, Alexander Von Humboldt Business University Corporation, Armenia 630001, Colombia)

  • Luis Horacio Botero Montoya

    (School of Economics, Administration and Business, Faculty of Business Administration, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, Colombia)

  • Luis Fernando Gutiérrez Cano

    (Faculty of Communication, School of Social Sciences, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, Colombia)

  • Julio González Candia

    (Faculty of Technology, Santiago University, Santiago 9170124, Chile)

  • José Orlando Gómez Salazar

    (Language Center, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, Colombia)

  • Gina Lía Orozco Mendoza

    (School of Engineering, Faculty of Agroindustrial Engineering, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, Colombia)

  • Nelson Javier Escobar Mora

    (School of Engineering, Faculty of Agroindustrial Engineering, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, Colombia)

Abstract

This study proposes a sustainable Innovation Management Model (MGI) for the plantain agroindustrial chain, applied to the Quindío region of Colombia. A mixed-methods approach was employed, incorporating various techniques, including a systematic literature review using the Scopus database, which analyzed 95 documents through the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework. The identification and prioritization of relevant variables, along with the validation of the proposed model, were also conducted through the use of three questionnaires, supplemented by relevance and congruence indices. The analysis identified 53 variables for the entry stage, 36 for the transformation stage, and 31 for the exit stage. The findings revealed significant gaps within the agroindustrial chain, particularly in areas such as leadership, strategic management, and resilience among key stakeholders. The MGI, as prioritized by stakeholders, provides a framework that integrates variables and information flows, facilitating the development of new open innovation challenges. These challenges engage not only seekers—entities that require innovation—but also solvers—organizations that offer solutions. The implementation of this model will require supportive public policies, projects, and web platforms, such as Innocentive/Wazoku, Ninesigma, Ruta N, Yet2.com, Itonics, and Ennomotive, which, with the aid of artificial intelligence, can connect innovation supply and demand through open challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Jhon Wilder Zartha Sossa & Nolberto Gutiérrez Posada & Adriana María Zuluaga Monsalve & Luis Horacio Botero Montoya & Luis Fernando Gutiérrez Cano & Julio González Candia & José Orlando Gómez Salazar , 2025. "Sustainable Innovation Management Model (MGI) for Plantain Agroindustrial Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-27, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1716-:d:1594150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1716/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1716/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marullo, Cristina & Shapira, Philip & Di Minin, Alberto, 2024. "Enhancing SME innovation across European regions: Success factors in EU-funded open innovation networks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    2. Luis Horacio Botero Montoya & Nolberto Gutiérrez & Adriana Zuluaga & Luis Fernando Gutiérrez & José Orlando Gómez & Gina Lía Orozco & Jhon Wilder Zartha, 2024. "Proposal for Sustainability-Oriented Innovation Management Model (MGI) for Agro-Industrial Leather Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Guillermo Ivan Pereira & Patrícia Pereira Silva & Deborah Soule, 2018. "Policy-adaptation for a smarter and more sustainable EU electricity distribution industry: a foresight analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 231-267, December.
    4. Paloma Escamilla-Fajardo & Juan Manuel Núñez-Pomar & Vanessa Ratten & Josep Crespo, 2020. "Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Soccer: Web of Science Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Jhon Zartha & Gina Orozco & Diana Barreto & Diego García, 2024. "Sustainable Innovation in Organizations: A Look from Processes, Products, and Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomasz Rokicki & Radosław Jadczak & Adam Kucharski & Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & András Szeberényi & Aleksandra Perkowska, 2022. "Changes in Energy Consumption and Energy Intensity in EU Countries as a Result of the COVID-19 Pandemic by Sector and Area Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-26, August.
    2. Ishchenko, Oleksandra & Zamulko, Anatolii & Pfeiffer, Carlos & Johannesen, Nils Jakob, 2025. "Barriers and opportunities for Demand Response Aggregation in Ukraine and Norway: A Delphi-based study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    3. Clemente Rodríguez-Sabiote & Álvaro Manuel Úbeda-Sánchez & José Álvarez-Rodríguez & Daniel Álvarez-Ferrándiz, 2020. "Active Learning in an Environment of Innovative Training and Sustainability. Mapping of the Conceptual Structure of Research Fronts through a Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Fabio Wagner & Holger Preuss & Thomas Könecke, 2021. "A Central Element of Europe’s Football Ecosystem: Competitive Intensity in the “Big Five”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Pereira, Guillermo Ivan & Specht, Jan Martin & Silva, Patrícia Pereira & Madlener, Reinhard, 2018. "Technology, business model, and market design adaptation toward smart electricity distribution: Insights for policy making," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 426-440.
    6. Carlo Dindorf & Eva Bartaguiz & Freya Gassmann & Michael Fröhlich, 2022. "Conceptual Structure and Current Trends in Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning Research in Sports: A Bibliometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Kang, Jia-Ning & Wei, Yi-Ming & Liu, Lan-Cui & Han, Rong & Yu, Bi-Ying & Wang, Jin-Wei, 2020. "Energy systems for climate change mitigation: A systematic review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    8. Costa, Alessandra & Crupi, Antonio & Barabuffi, Saverio & Di Minin, Alberto, 2026. "Innovation coherence, financial slack, and SMEs' success in competitive innovation policies: Evidence from the EU SME-instrument," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    9. Soares, N. & Martins, A.G. & Carvalho, A.L. & Caldeira, C. & Du, C. & Castanheira, É. & Rodrigues, E. & Oliveira, G. & Pereira, G.I. & Bastos, J. & Ferreira, J.P. & Ribeiro, L.A. & Figueiredo, N.C. & , 2018. "The challenging paradigm of interrelated energy systems towards a more sustainable future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 171-193.
    10. Hammerschmidt, Jonas & Durst, Susanne & Kraus, Sascha & Puumalainen, Kaisu, 2021. "Professional football clubs and empirical evidence from the COVID-19 crisis: Time for sport entrepreneurship?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    11. Pereira, Guillermo Ivan & Pereira da Silva, Patrícia & Cerqueira, Pedro André, 2020. "Electricity distribution incumbents' adaptation toward decarbonized and smarter grids: Evidence on the role market, regulatory, investment, and firm-level factors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    12. Pereira, Guillermo Ivan & Niesten, Eva & Pinkse, Jonatan, 2022. "Sustainable energy systems in the making: A study on business model adaptation in incumbent utilities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    13. Winand, Mathieu & Schneiders, Christopher & Merten, Sebastian & Marlier, Mathieu, 2021. "Sports fans and innovation: An analysis of football fans’ satisfaction with video assistant refereeing through social identity and argumentative theories," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 99-109.
    14. Tomasz Rokicki & Piotr Bórawski & András Szeberényi, 2023. "The Impact of the 2020–2022 Crises on EU Countries’ Independence from Energy Imports, Particularly from Russia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-26, September.
    15. Indre Siksnelyte & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2019. "Achievements of the European Union Countries in Seeking a Sustainable Electricity Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Tomasz Rokicki & Aleksandra Perkowska, 2021. "Diversity and Changes in the Energy Balance in EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Josue N. Otshwe & Bin Li & Songsong Chen & Feixiang Gong & Bing Qi & Ngouokoua J. Chabrol, 2025. "Adaptive Control and Market Integration: Optimizing Distributed Power Resources for a Sustainable Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-14, March.
    18. Tomasz Rokicki & Piotr Bórawski & Barbara Gradziuk & Piotr Gradziuk & Aldona Mrówczyńska-Kamińska & Joanna Kozak & Danuta Jolanta Guzal-Dec & Kamil Wojtczuk, 2021. "Differentiation and Changes of Household Electricity Prices in EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    19. Isabel Soares & Paula Ferreira & Luc Hens, 2018. "Energy and environmental challenges: bringing together economics and engineering (ICEE’17)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-5, December.
    20. Sebastian Aparicio & Andreu Turro & Maria Noguera, 2020. "Entrepreneurship and Intrapreneurship in Social, Sustainable, and Economic Development: Opportunities and Challenges for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-11, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1716-:d:1594150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.