IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1698-d1593899.html

From House to Farm: Life Cycle Assessment of Sewage Sludge as a Circular Fertiliser at Regional European Level

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Pérez-García

    (Galician Water Research Center Foundation (Cetaqua Galicia), AquaHub-A Vila da Auga, Rúa José Villar Granjel 33, 15890 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

  • Pedro Villanueva-Rey

    (Galician Water Research Center Foundation (Cetaqua Galicia), AquaHub-A Vila da Auga, Rúa José Villar Granjel 33, 15890 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

  • Leticia Rodríguez-Hernández

    (VIAQUA, Gestión Integral de Aguas de Galicia, AquaHub-A Vila da Auga, José Villar Granjel 33, 15890 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

  • Teresa Alvarino

    (Galician Water Research Center Foundation (Cetaqua Galicia), AquaHub-A Vila da Auga, Rúa José Villar Granjel 33, 15890 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

  • Lucía González-Monjardin

    (Galician Water Research Center Foundation (Cetaqua Galicia), AquaHub-A Vila da Auga, Rúa José Villar Granjel 33, 15890 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

Abstract

This study evaluates the environmental performance of stabilised sewage sludge used as a circular fertiliser across three European regions: Central, Mediterranean, and Northern Europe, comparing its performance against non-renewable fertilisers. The research applies a life cycle assessment approach, considering a mix of the most used stabilisation technologies in each region, such as anaerobic digestion, chemical treatment, thermal drying, composting, and aerobic digestion. Environmental impacts were assessed based on key categories, including climate change, acidification, eutrophication, and resource use. The environmental performance of circular fertiliser production outperformed non-renewable fertilisers in all assessed categories, showcasing its potential as a sustainable alternative. Findings reveal that the choice of stabilisation process is key to the overall environmental performance of the region. High energy-driven technologies such as thermal drying present the bigger impacts. Regional disparities highlight the need for context-specific technology selection to optimise environmental outcomes. The study underscores the importance of integrating energy recovery and nutrient recycling in sludge management practices. These findings advocate for the promotion of circular fertilisers within a sustainable agricultural framework, emphasising technology adaptation based on local conditions to enhance ecological and economic benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Pérez-García & Pedro Villanueva-Rey & Leticia Rodríguez-Hernández & Teresa Alvarino & Lucía González-Monjardin, 2025. "From House to Farm: Life Cycle Assessment of Sewage Sludge as a Circular Fertiliser at Regional European Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1698-:d:1593899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1698/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1698/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Huan & Jin, Chang & Zhang, Zhanying & O'Hara, Ian & Mundree, Sagadevan, 2017. "Environmental and economic life cycle assessment of energy recovery from sewage sludge through different anaerobic digestion pathways," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 649-657.
    2. Ciro Florio & Gabriella Fiorentino & Fabiana Corcelli & Sergio Ulgiati & Stefano Dumontet & Joshua Güsewell & Ludger Eltrop, 2019. "A Life Cycle Assessment of Biomethane Production from Waste Feedstock Through Different Upgrading Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lesli Hoey & Mathew Lippincott & Lanika Sanders & Jennifer Blesh & Nancy Love, 2025. "Examining Regulatory Pathways That Enable and Constrain Urine Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-25, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Svetlana Zueva & Andrey A. Kovalev & Yury V. Litti & Nicolò M. Ippolito & Valentina Innocenzi & Ida De Michelis, 2021. "Environmental and Economic Aspects of Biomethane Production from Organic Waste in Russia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-8, August.
    2. Hijazi, O. & Abdelsalam, E. & Samer, M. & Attia, Y.A. & Amer, B.M.A. & Amer, M.A. & Badr, M. & Bernhardt, H., 2020. "Life cycle assessment of the use of nanomaterials in biogas production from anaerobic digestion of manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 417-424.
    3. Shanling Zhang & Sheng Jiang & Hongda Li & Peiran Li & Xiuping Zhong & Chen Chen & Guigang Tu & Xiang Liu & Zhenhua Xu, 2025. "Current Status and Reflections on Ocean CO 2 Sequestration: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-28, February.
    4. Sylwia Myszograj, 2019. "Biogas and Methane Potential of Pre-Thermally Disintegrated Bio-Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-12, October.
    5. Di Maria, Francesco & Sisani, Federico & Lasagni, Marzio & Borges, Marisa Soares & Gonzales, Thiago H., 2018. "Replacement of energy crops with bio-waste in existing anaerobic digestion plants: An energetic and environmental analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 202-213.
    6. Rasheed, Rizwan & Tahir, Fizza & Yasar, Abdullah & Sharif, Faiza & Tabinda, Amtul Bari & Ahmad, Sajid Rashid & Wang, Yubo & Su, Yuehong, 2022. "Environmental life cycle analysis of a modern commercial-scale fibreglass composite-based biogas scrubbing system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1261-1271.
    7. Apoorva Upadhyay & Andrey A. Kovalev & Elena A. Zhuravleva & Dmitriy A. Kovalev & Yuriy V. Litti & Shyam Kumar Masakapalli & Nidhi Pareek & Vivekanand Vivekanand, 2022. "Recent Development in Physical, Chemical, Biological and Hybrid Biogas Upgradation Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-30, December.
    8. Zhang, Zhe & Liu, Congmin & Liu, Wei & Du, Xu & Cui, Yong & Gong, Jian & Guo, Hua & Deng, Yulin, 2017. "Direct conversion of sewage sludge to electricity using polyoxomatelate catalyzed flow fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1019-1026.
    9. Bidart, Christian & Wichert, Martin & Kolb, Gunther & Held, Michael, 2022. "Biogas catalytic methanation for biomethane production as fuel in freight transport - A carbon footprint assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    10. Mehta, Neha & Anderson, Aine & Johnston, Christopher R. & Rooney, David W., 2022. "Evaluating the opportunity for utilising anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis of livestock manure and grass silage to decarbonise gas infrastructure: A Northern Ireland case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 343-357.
    11. Safwat M. Safwat & Ahmed Eita & Minerva E. Matta, 2026. "Viability and life cycle assessment of Fuller's Earth as a low-cost adsorbent for zinc removal from aqueous solutions: Operating parameters, removal mechanisms and environmental impacts," Energy & Environment, , vol. 37(2), pages 853-876, March.
    12. Samer, Mohamed & Abdelaziz, Salwa & Refai, Mohamed & Abdelsalam, Essam, 2020. "Techno-economic assessment of dry fermentation in household biogas units through co-digestion of manure and agricultural crop residues in Egypt," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 226-234.
    13. Liu, Jiayi & Li, Debin & Wang, Lin & Li, Huan & Deng, Zhou, 2024. "Comprehensive assessment of sludge wet air oxidation and its combination with anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PB).
    14. Kumar, Atul & Samadder, S.R., 2020. "Performance evaluation of anaerobic digestion technology for energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    15. Abdelsalam, E. & Hijazi, O. & Samer, M. & Yacoub, I.H. & Ali, A.S. & Ahmed, R.H. & Bernhardt, H., 2019. "Life cycle assessment of the use of laser radiation in biogas production from anaerobic digestion of manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 130-136.
    16. Lombardi, Lidia & Francini, Giovanni, 2020. "Techno-economic and environmental assessment of the main biogas upgrading technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 440-458.
    17. Kotagodahetti, Ravihari & Hewage, Kasun & Sadiq, Rehan, 2026. "Fossil gas decarbonization with low-carbon fuels: A system dynamics modelling approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    18. Ravindran, J.K. & Fagg, D.P. & Coelho, M.C., 2025. "Current production routes and life cycle analysis of “Green Energy-Dense Fuels” from biogas: A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 402(PA).
    19. M. Samer & O. Hijazi & E. M. Abdelsalam & A. El-Hussein & Y. A. Attia & I. H. Yacoub & H. Bernhardt, 2021. "Life cycle assessment of using laser treatment and nanomaterials to produce biogas through anaerobic digestion of slurry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14683-14696, October.
    20. Francesca Valenti & Attilio Toscano, 2021. "A GIS-Based Model to Assess the Potential of Wastewater Treatment Plants for Enhancing Bioenergy Production within the Context of the Water–Energy Nexus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1698-:d:1593899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.