IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1579-d1591245.html

Life Cycle Assessment of a Composite Prototype Battery Enclosure for Electric Vehicles

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo De Sio

    (Department of Chemical, Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80125 Naples, NA, Italy)

  • Marica Gaito

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, SA, Italy)

  • Vitantonio Esperto

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, SA, Italy)

  • Ersilia Cozzolino

    (Department of Chemical, Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80125 Naples, NA, Italy)

  • Antonello Astarita

    (Department of Chemical, Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80125 Naples, NA, Italy)

  • Fausto Tucci

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, SA, Italy)

Abstract

The use of lightweight components in automobiles started a new chapter in the automotive sector due to the renewable energy and sustainability increasing the overall efficiency of vehicles. As vehicle weight is directly linked to energy consumption, reducing mass through advanced materials can significantly decrease energy usage and emissions over the vehicle’s lifetime. This present study aims to conduct a preliminary life cycle assessment (LCA) of a prototype battery pack manufactured using pultruded composite materials with a volume fraction of 50% glass fibers and a volume fraction of 50% nylon 6 (PA6) matrix by quantifying the CO 2 emissions and cumulative energy demand (CED) associated with each stage of the battery pack’s life cycle, encompassing production, usage, and end-of-life recycling. The results of the EuCia Eco Impact Calculator and from the literature reveal that the raw materials extraction and use phases are the most energy-intensive and contribute mainly to the environmental footprint of the battery pack. For a single battery pack for EV, the CED is 13,629.9 MJ, and the CO 2 eq emissions during production are 1323.9 kg. These results highlight the need for innovations in material sourcing and design strategies to mitigate these impacts. Moreover, the variations in recycling methods were assessed using a sensitivity analysis to understand how they affect the overall environmental impact of the system. Specifically, shifting from mechanical recycling to pyrolysis results in an increase of 4% to 19% of the total CO 2 emissions (kg CO 2 ). Future goals include building a laboratory-scale model based on the prototype described in this paper to compare the environmental impacts considering equal mechanical properties with alternatives currently used in the automotive industry, such as aluminum and steel alloys.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo De Sio & Marica Gaito & Vitantonio Esperto & Ersilia Cozzolino & Antonello Astarita & Fausto Tucci, 2025. "Life Cycle Assessment of a Composite Prototype Battery Enclosure for Electric Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1579-:d:1591245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1579/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1579/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ma, Hongrui & Balthasar, Felix & Tait, Nigel & Riera-Palou, Xavier & Harrison, Andrew, 2012. "A new comparison between the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of battery electric vehicles and internal combustion vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 160-173.
    2. Brian Azzopardi & Abdul Hapid & Sunarto Kaleg & Sudirja & Djulia Onggo & Alexander C. Budiman, 2023. "Recent Advances in Battery Pack Polymer Composites," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-23, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Souhir Ben Amor & Smaranda Sgarciu & Taimyra BatzLineiro & Felix Muesgens, 2024. "Advanced Models for Hourly Marginal CO2 Emission Factor Estimation: A Synergy between Fundamental and Statistical Approaches," Papers 2412.17379, arXiv.org.
    2. Togun, Hussein & Basem, Ali & Abdulrazzaq, Tuqa & Biswas, Nirmalendu & Abed, Azher M. & dhabab, Jameel M. & Chattopadhyay, Anirban & Slimi, Khalifa & Paul, Dipankar & Barmavatu, Praveen & Chrouda, Ama, 2025. "Development and comparative analysis between battery electric vehicles (BEV) and fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEV)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 388(C).
    3. Onat, Nuri Cihat & Kucukvar, Murat & Tatari, Omer, 2015. "Conventional, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicles? State-based comparative carbon and energy footprint analysis in the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 36-49.
    4. José M. Cansino & Antonio Sánchez-Braza & Teresa Sanz-Díaz, 2018. "Policy Instruments to Promote Electro-Mobility in the EU28: A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, July.
    5. Vedrenne, Michel & Pérez, Javier & Lumbreras, Julio & Rodríguez, María Encarnación, 2014. "Life cycle assessment as a policy-support tool: The case of taxis in the city of Madrid," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 185-197.
    6. Kalghatgi, Gautam, 2018. "Is it really the end of internal combustion engines and petroleum in transport?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 965-974.
    7. Manjunath, Archana & Gross, George, 2017. "Towards a meaningful metric for the quantification of GHG emissions of electric vehicles (EVs)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 423-429.
    8. Morton, Craig & Anable, Jillian & Yeboah, Godwin & Cottrill, Caitlin, 2018. "The spatial pattern of demand in the early market for electric vehicles: Evidence from the United Kingdom," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 119-130.
    9. Dejkam, Rahil & Madlener, Reinhard, 2025. "Green mobility infrastructure: A techno-economic analysis of hybrid wind–solar PV charging stations for electric vehicles in Germany," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    10. Siqin Xiong & Junping Ji & Xiaoming Ma, 2019. "Comparative Life Cycle Energy and GHG Emission Analysis for BEVs and PhEVs: A Case Study in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Zhao, Yang & Noori, Mehdi & Tatari, Omer, 2017. "Boosting the adoption and the reliability of renewable energy sources: Mitigating the large-scale wind power intermittency through vehicle to grid technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 608-618.
    12. Zheng, Menglian & Wang, Xinhao & Meinrenken, Christoph J. & Ding, Yi, 2018. "Economic and environmental benefits of coordinating dispatch among distributed electricity storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 842-855.
    13. Suparat Jamsawang & Saharat Chanthanumataporn & Kittiwoot Sutthivirode & Tongchana Thongtip, 2024. "Investigation of the Performance of Battery Thermal Management Based on Direct Refrigerant Cooling: Simulation, Validation of Results, and Parametric Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Robin Smit & Daniel William Kennedy, 2022. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Performance of Electric and Fossil-Fueled Passenger Vehicles with Uncertainty Estimates Using a Probabilistic Life-Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-29, March.
    15. Mokesioluwa Fanoro & Mladen Božanić & Saurabh Sinha, 2022. "A Review of the Impact of Battery Degradation on Energy Management Systems with a Special Emphasis on Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-29, August.
    16. Farrell, Katharine N. & Löw Beer, David, 2019. "Producing the ecological economy: A study in developing fiduciary principles supporting the application of flow-fund consistent investment criteria for sovereign wealth funds," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Kain Glensor & María Rosa Muñoz B., 2019. "Life-Cycle Assessment of Brazilian Transport Biofuel and Electrification Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-31, November.
    18. Fuad Un-Noor & Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban & Lucian Mihet-Popa & Mohammad Nurunnabi Mollah & Eklas Hossain, 2017. "A Comprehensive Study of Key Electric Vehicle (EV) Components, Technologies, Challenges, Impacts, and Future Direction of Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-84, August.
    19. Xiao, Xu & Chen, Zi-Rui & Nie, Pu-Yan, 2020. "Analysis of two subsidies for EVs: Based on an expanded theoretical discrete-choice model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    20. Müller, Wieland & Leyer, Michael & Degirmenci, Kenan & Barros, Alistair, 2025. "Designing EV charging networks from a city perspective: A conceptual analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1579-:d:1591245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.