IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1498-d1589086.html

Consumer Sustainability: Is Knowledge Linked to Behavior in Recycling?

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Jian Xiao

    (Department of Human Development and Family Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Parisa Rafiee

    (Department of Human Development and Family Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Feihong Xia

    (Department of Human Development and Family Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Jing Wu

    (Department of Human Development and Family Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

Abstract

Sustainable consumer behavior encompasses any action that benefits both the environment and society. Recycling is a prime example of such behavior. However, there is a lack of research examining the connection between knowledge about recycling and recycling behavior. The purpose of this study was to examine factors associated with consumer recycling behavior under the guidance of an extended theory of planned behavior with an emphasis on the role of recycling knowledge. Using data collected from a national online survey in the U.S., results from the structural equation modeling showed that ascription of responsibility to others is negatively associated with recycling behavior, while behavior skill is positively associated with it. Also, both subjective and objective knowledge measures are positively associated with recycling behavior. In addition, subjective recycling knowledge moderates the relationships between attitude and recycling behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Jian Xiao & Parisa Rafiee & Feihong Xia & Jing Wu, 2025. "Consumer Sustainability: Is Knowledge Linked to Behavior in Recycling?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1498-:d:1589086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1498/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1498/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dang Vu, Hoai Nam & Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt, 2022. "Understanding determinants of the intention to buy rhino horn in Vietnam through the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Theory of Interpersonal Behaviour," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Sara Manca & Ferdinando Fornara, 2019. "Attitude Toward Sustainable Transport as a Function of Source and Argument Reliability and Anticipated Emotions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-10, June.
    3. Hannah Budnitz & Toon Meelen & Tim Schwanen, 2026. "Electric vehicle adoption intentions among UK residents parking in shared and public spaces," Transportation, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 937-960, April.
    4. Sebastian Kurten & David Winant & Kathleen Beullens, 2021. "Mothers Matter: Using Regression Tree Algorithms to Predict Adolescents’ Sharing of Drunk References on Social Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Jonathan Jan Pieters & Alinda Kokkinou & Ton Kollenburg, 2022. "Understanding Blockchain Technology Adoption by Non-experts: an Application of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Bouscasse, H. & Bonnel, P., 2016. "Socio-psychological determinants of mode choice habits," Working Papers 2016-05, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
    7. Marjolein C. J. Caniëls & Wim Lambrechts & Johannes (Joost) Platje & Anna Motylska-Kuźma & Bartosz Fortuński, 2021. "50 Shades of Green: Insights into Personal Values and Worldviews as Drivers of Green Purchasing Intention, Behaviour, and Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Richard Blaese & Schneider Noemi & Liebig Brigitte, 2021. "Should I Stay, or Should I Go? Job satisfaction as a moderating factor between outcome expectations and entrepreneurial intention among academics," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1357-1386, September.
    9. Lea Marie Heidbreder & Julia Steinhorst & Manfred Schmitt, 2020. "Plastic-Free July: An Experimental Study of Limiting and Promoting Factors in Encouraging a Reduction of Single-Use Plastic Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Shneor, Rotem & Munim, Ziaul Haque, 2019. "Reward crowdfunding contribution as planned behaviour: An extended framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 56-70.
    11. B. Hamrick, Alexander & Murnieks, Charles Y. & A. Waddingham, Jacob, 2025. "Exploring my entrepreneurial self at work: How entrepreneurial identity aspiration influences employee intrapreneurial behaviors and work performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    12. Hössinger, Reinhard & Peer, Stefanie & Juschten, Maria, 2023. "Give citizens a task: An innovative tool to compose policy bundles that reach the climate goal," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    13. Leonidou, Leonidas C. & Eteokleous, Pantelitsa P. & Christofi, Anna-Maria & Korfiatis, Nikolaos, 2022. "Drivers, outcomes, and moderators of consumer intention to buy organic goods: Meta-analysis, implications, and future agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 339-354.
    14. Ling Xu & Jianghua Liu, 2020. "The Turnover Intention among Grassroots Family Planning Staff in the Context of China’s Universal Two-Child Policy: A Case Study of the Xi’an City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Jan Hildebrand & Timo Kortsch & Irina Rau, 2025. "The Public Acceptance of Power-to-X Technologies—Results from Environmental–Psychological Research Using a Representative German Sample," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-25, July.
    16. Ricci, Elena Claire & Banterle, Alessandro & Stranieri, Stefanella, 2018. "Trust to Go Green: An Exploration of Consumer Intentions for Eco-friendly Convenience Food," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 54-65.
    17. Manning, Mark & Lucas, Todd & Purrington, Kristen & Thompson, Hayley & Albrecht, Terrance L. & Penner, Louis, 2023. "Moderators of the effects of perceived racism and discrimination on cancer-related health behaviors among two samples of African Americans," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
    18. Antoniak, Marcin & Szymkowiak, Andrzej & Pepliński, Benedykt, . "Shaping intention to pay attention to health claims," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 67(1).
    19. Huang, Guei-Hua & Korfiatis, Nikolaos & Chang, Chun-Tuan, 2018. "Mobile shopping cart abandonment: The roles of conflicts, ambivalence, and hesitation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 165-174.
    20. Manning, Mark & Albrecht, Terrance L. & Yilmaz-Saab, Zeynep & Penner, Louis & Norman, Andria & Purrington, Kristen, 2017. "Explaining between-race differences in African-American and European-American women's responses to breast density notification," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 149-158.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1498-:d:1589086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.