IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9488-d1779237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybrid Hydropower–PV with Mining Flexibility and Heat Recovery: Article 6-Ready Mitigation Pathways in Central Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Seung-Jun Lee

    (Geodesy Laboratory, Civil & Architectural and Environmental System Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea)

  • Tae-Yun Kim

    (Geodesy Laboratory, Civil & Architectural and Environmental System Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea)

  • Jun-Sik Cho

    (Disaster & Risk Management Laboratory, Interdisciplinary Program in Crisis & Disaster and Risk Management, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea
    New Airport Promotion Team, Korea Airports Corporation, 78 Haneul-gil, Gangseo-gu, Seoul 07505, Republic of Korea)

  • Ji-Sung Kim

    (School of Geography, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Hong-Sik Yun

    (Geodesy Laboratory, Civil & Architectural and Environmental System Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

The global transition to renewable energy requires hybrid solutions that address variability while delivering tangible co-benefits and verifiable mitigation outcomes. This study evaluates a novel small hydropower–photovoltaic (SHP–PV) hybrid system in the Kyrgyz Republic that integrates flexible Bitcoin mining loads and waste-heat recovery for greenhouse heating. A techno-economic model was developed for a 10 MW configuration, allocating annual net generation of 57.34 GWh between grid export and on-site mining through a single decision parameter. Mitigation accounting applies a combined margin grid factor of 0.4–0.7 tCO 2 /MWh for exported electricity and a diesel factor of 0.26–0.27 tCO 2 /MWh_fuel for heat displacement, yielding Article 6–eligible reductions from both electricity and recovered heat. Waste-heat recovery from mining supplies ≈15 MWh_th/year to a 50 m 2 greenhouse, displacing diesel use and demonstrating visible sustainable development co-benefits. Economic analysis reproduces annual revenues of ≈$1.9 million, with a levelized cost of electricity of $48/MWh and an indicative IRR of ~6%, consistent with positive but modest returns under merchant operation and uplift potential under mixed allocations. This study concludes that componentized accounting—exported electricity credited under grid displacement and diesel displacement credited from recovered heat—ensures Article 6 integrity and positions SHP–PV hybrids as replicable, multi-service renewable models for Central Asia. Unlike prior hybrid studies that treat generation, economics, and mitigation separately, our framework integrates allocation (α), financial outcomes, and Article 6 carbon accounting within a unified structure, while explicitly modeling Bitcoin mining as an endogenous flexible load with thermal recovery—advancing methodological approaches for multi-service renewable systems in climate policy contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Seung-Jun Lee & Tae-Yun Kim & Jun-Sik Cho & Ji-Sung Kim & Hong-Sik Yun, 2025. "Hybrid Hydropower–PV with Mining Flexibility and Heat Recovery: Article 6-Ready Mitigation Pathways in Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-33, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9488-:d:1779237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9488/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9488/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali, Fahad & Ahmar, Muhammad & Jiang, Yuexiang & AlAhmad, Mohammad, 2021. "A techno-economic assessment of hybrid energy systems in rural Pakistan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    2. Saif Mubaarak & Delong Zhang & Jinxin Liu & Yongcong Chen & Longze Wang & Sayed A. Zaki & Rongfang Yuan & Jing Wu & Yan Zhang & Meicheng Li, 2020. "Potential Techno-Economic Feasibility of Hybrid Energy Systems for Electrifying Various Consumers in Yemen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Kougias, Ioannis & Szabó, Sándor & Monforti-Ferrario, Fabio & Huld, Thomas & Bódis, Katalin, 2016. "A methodology for optimization of the complementarity between small-hydropower plants and solar PV systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P2), pages 1023-1030.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jurasz, Jakub & Beluco, Alexandre & Canales, Fausto A., 2018. "The impact of complementarity on power supply reliability of small scale hybrid energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 737-743.
    2. Vadim Manusov & Svetlana Beryozkina & Muso Nazarov & Murodbek Safaraliev & Inga Zicmane & Pavel Matrenin & Anvari Ghulomzoda, 2022. "Optimal Management of Energy Consumption in an Autonomous Power System Considering Alternative Energy Sources," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Sanjoy Kumar Saha, 2024. "Assessing the impact of rural electrification on economic growth: a comprehensive analysis considering informal economy and income inequality in Bangladesh," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 551-583, June.
    4. Jurasz, Jakub & Ciapała, Bartłomiej, 2017. "Integrating photovoltaics into energy systems by using a run-off-river power plant with pondage to smooth energy exchange with the power gird," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 21-35.
    5. Constantino Dário Justo & José Eduardo Tafula & Pedro Moura, 2022. "Planning Sustainable Energy Systems in the Southern African Development Community: A Review of Power Systems Planning Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-28, October.
    6. Pereira, Géssica Michelle dos Santos & Weigert, Gabriela Rosalee & Macedo, Pablo Lopes & Silva, Kiane Alves e & Segura Salas, Cresencio Silvio & Gonçalves, Antônio Maurício de Matos & Nascimento, Hebe, 2022. "Quasi-dynamic operation and maintenance plan for photovoltaic systems in remote areas: The framework of Pantanal-MS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 404-416.
    7. Kenfack, Joseph & Nzotcha, Urbain & Voufo, Joseph & Ngohe-Ekam, Paul Salomon & Nsangou, Jean Calvin & Bignom, Blaise, 2021. "Cameroon's hydropower potential and development under the vision of Central Africa power pool (CAPP): A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Muhammad Ahmar & Fahad Ali & Yuexiang Jiang & Mamdooh Alwetaishi & Sherif S. M. Ghoneim, 2022. "Households’ Energy Choices in Rural Pakistan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Mahmoudimehr, Javad & Shabani, Masoume, 2018. "Optimal design of hybrid photovoltaic-hydroelectric standalone energy system for north and south of Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 238-251.
    10. Arifa Tanveer & Shihong Zeng & Muhammad Irfan & Rui Peng, 2021. "Do Perceived Risk, Perception of Self-Efficacy, and Openness to Technology Matter for Solar PV Adoption? An Application of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
    11. Ren, Haoshan & Ma, Zhenjun & Chan, Antoni B. & Sun, Yongjun, 2023. "Optimal planning of municipal-scale distributed rooftop photovoltaic systems with maximized solar energy generation under constraints in high-density cities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    12. Abdullah Al Abri & Abdullah Al Kaaf & Musaab Allouyahi & Ali Al Wahaibi & Razzaqul Ahshan & Rashid S. Al Abri & Ahmed Al Abri, 2022. "Techno-Economic and Environmental Analysis of Renewable Mix Hybrid Energy System for Sustainable Electrification of Al-Dhafrat Rural Area in Oman," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Moon-Su Na & Jin-O Kim, 2019. "Reliability Evaluation of Micro-grids Containing PV System and Hydropower Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, January.
    14. Alya AlHammadi & Nasser Al-Saif & Ameena Saad Al-Sumaiti & Mousa Marzband & Tareefa Alsumaiti & Ehsan Heydarian-Forushani, 2022. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems Designed for Electric Vehicle Charging: A Case Study from the United Arab Emirates," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Auth, Trevor L. & Wackerman, Grace E. & Garcia, Marcelo H. & Stillwell, Ashlynn S., 2021. "Low-head hydropower as a reserve power source: A case study of Northeastern Illinois," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 980-989.
    16. Ioan Cristian Hoarcă & Nicu Bizon & Ioan Sorin Șorlei & Phatiphat Thounthong, 2023. "Sizing Design for a Hybrid Renewable Power System Using HOMER and iHOGA Simulators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, February.
    17. Narayan, Nishant & Chamseddine, Ali & Vega-Garita, Victor & Qin, Zian & Popovic-Gerber, Jelena & Bauer, Pavol & Zeman, Miroslav, 2019. "Exploring the boundaries of Solar Home Systems (SHS) for off-grid electrification: Optimal SHS sizing for the multi-tier framework for household electricity access," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 907-917.
    18. Clemente, D. & Rosa-Santos, P. & Taveira-Pinto, F., 2021. "On the potential synergies and applications of wave energy converters: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    19. Harrison-Atlas, Dylan & Murphy, Caitlin & Schleifer, Anna & Grue, Nicholas, 2022. "Temporal complementarity and value of wind-PV hybrid systems across the United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 111-123.
    20. Urbano, Eva M. & Martinez-Viol, Victor & Kampouropoulos, Konstantinos & Romeral, Luis, 2022. "Risk assessment of energy investment in the industrial framework – Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis for energy design and operation optimisation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9488-:d:1779237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.