IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9454-d1778760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unraveling the Impact of Disclosed Corporate Values on Sustainability Governance: An fsQCA Analysis of IBEX35-Listed Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Javier Pérez-Temprano

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Seville, 41018 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Carlos Sanchís-Pedregosa

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Seville, 41018 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Seville, 41018 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Emma Berenguer

    (Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, Pablo de Olavide University, 41013 Seville, Spain)

Abstract

This study aims to examine the corporate values of IBEX35-listed companies and compare them with the sustainability governance information in their Non-Financial Statements (NFSs) to identify cultural patterns indicating high sustainability governance maturity (HSGM). The study uses the Cultural Fit Assessment Method (CFAM©) based on the Competing Values Framework (CVF) and six cultural archetypes (People, Goals, Digital, Innovation, Norms, ESG). It also incorporates sector-specific indicators related to sustainability governance from the IV Comparative Report of the NFS of IBEX35-listed companies published in 2021 by Ernst and Young (E&Y). A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) was conducted to identify patterns of corporate culture that explain the high maturity levels of sustainability governance. The results reveal two sector-level paths to HSGM in which Digital emerges as a core presence condition and ESG appears as a core absence condition (~ESG). ESG does not emerge as a necessary condition; instead, HSGM arises configurationally. The first combination encompasses the presence of people, goals, and digital cultures, coupled with the absence of innovation, norms, and ESG archetypes, resulting in an HSGM model. The other alternative to obtaining HSGM is through a cultural combination of the absence of people, goals, and ESG cultures alongside a strong emphasis on digital, innovation, and norms archetypes. This study offers a unique approach to assessing the maturity of sustainability governance based on corporate culture. Identifying patterns of corporate culture that indicate high maturity levels of sustainability governance offers practical guidance on how organizations can enhance their sustainability practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Javier Pérez-Temprano & Carlos Sanchís-Pedregosa & Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez & Emma Berenguer, 2025. "Unraveling the Impact of Disclosed Corporate Values on Sustainability Governance: An fsQCA Analysis of IBEX35-Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9454-:d:1778760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9454/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9454/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Han-Hsing Lee & Woan-lih Liang & Quynh-Nhu Tran & Quang-Thai Truong, 2024. "Do Old Board Directors Promote Corporate Social Responsibility?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 67-93, November.
    2. Razan Abdullah Al Rawaf & Abdulaziz Abdulmohsen Alfalih, 2023. "The Role of Governance in Achieving Sustainability in Family-Owned Business: Do Responsible Innovation and Entrepreneurial Culture Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Schein, Edgar H., 1983. "The role of the founder in the creation of organizational culture," Working papers 1407-83., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    4. Shuang Ren & Di Fan & Guiyao Tang, 2023. "Organizations’ Management Configurations Towards Environment and Market Performances," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(2), pages 239-257, November.
    5. Usama Awan & Andrzej Kraslawski & Janne Huiskonen, 2018. "Governing Interfirm Relationships for Social Sustainability: The Relationship between Governance Mechanisms, Sustainable Collaboration, and Cultural Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Georgios A. Deirmentzoglou & Konstantina K. Agoraki & Patroklos Patsoulis, 2023. "The nexus between cultural values and perceptions of corporate sustainable development," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(2), pages 224-242, June.
    7. Xin Jin & Xue Lei, 2023. "A Study on the Mechanism of ESG’s Impact on Corporate Value under the Concept of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    9. Mara Bauer & Sebastian Niedlich & Marco Rieckmann & Inka Bormann & Larissa Jaeger, 2020. "Interdependencies of Culture and Functions of Sustainability Governance at Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sakhr Bani-Khaled & Graça Azevedo & Jonas Oliveira, 2025. "Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors and firm value: A systematic literature review of theories and empirical evidence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 15(1), pages 228-260, June.
    2. Yong Wang & Pat Costello, 2009. "An Investigation into Innovations in SMEs," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 18(1), pages 65-93, March.
    3. Moreno-Menéndez, Ana M. & Casillas, José C., 2021. "How do family businesses grow? Differences in growth patterns between family and non-family firms," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(3).
    4. Witold Nowiński & Wanda Nowara, 2011. "Stopień i uwarunkowania internacjonalizacji polskich małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 29-45.
    5. Gregorio Rius-Sorolla & Sofía Estelles-Miguel & Carlos Rueda-Armengot, 2020. "Multivariable Supplier Segmentation in Sustainable Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Peter E. Harland & Zakir Uddin & Sven Laudien, 2020. "Product platforms as a lever of competitive advantage on a company-wide level: a resource management perspective," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 137-158, February.
    7. Marco Valeri & Rodolfo Baggio, 2021. "A critical reflection on the adoption of blockchain in tourism," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 121-132, June.
    8. Arie Y Lewin & Silvia Massini & Carine Peeters, 2020. "Absorptive capacity, socially enabling mechanisms, and the role of learning from trial and error experiments: A tribute to Dan Levinthal’s contribution to international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(9), pages 1568-1579, December.
    9. Claudio Vitari & Elisabetta Raguseo, 2016. "Digital data, dynamic capability and financial performance: an empirical investigation in the era of Big Data," Post-Print halshs-01923271, HAL.
    10. David G. Sirmon & Michael A. Hitt, 2003. "Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management, and Wealth Creation in Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 27(4), pages 339-358, October.
    11. Kim, Yeonshin & Hur, Won-Moo & Lee, Luri, 2023. "Understanding customer participation in CSR activities: The impact of perceptions of CSR, affective commitment, brand equity, and corporate reputation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    12. Nils Grashof, 2020. "Sinking or swimming in the cluster labour pool? A firm-specific analysis of the effect of specialized labour," Jena Economics Research Papers 2020-006, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    13. Cannavale, Chiara & Esempio, Anna & Ferretti, Marco, 2021. "Up- and down- alliances: A systematic literature review," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5).
    14. Catherine Wanjiru Gathitu & Elegwa Mukulu & John Kihoro, 2021. "The influence of credit on the growth of YEDF- funded group-based enterprises in Nairobi County, Kenya," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(2), pages 183-194, March.
    15. Jim Andersén, 2023. "Green resource orchestration: A critical appraisal of the use of resource orchestration in environmental management research, and a research agenda for future study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5506-5520, December.
    16. Lynn E. Miller & Karen A. Simmons, 1992. "Differences in Management Practices of Founding and Nonfounding Chief Executives of Human Service Organizations," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 16(4), pages 31-40, July.
    17. repec:ehu:cuader:33227 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Jianghua Zhou & Rui Wu & Jizhen Li, 2019. "More ties the merrier? Different social ties and firm innovation performance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 445-471, June.
    19. Ruiyi Zhao & Ling Li, 2024. "Does digitalization always benefit cultural, sports, and tourism enterprises quality? Unveiling the inverted U-shaped relationship from a resource and capability perspective," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Michael K. Fung, 2019. "Fraudulent Financial Reporting and Technological Capability in the Information Technology Sector: A Resource-Based Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 577-589, May.
    21. Alexander Kalita & Alexander Chepurenko, 2020. "Competitiveness of Small and Medium Businesses and Competitive Pressure in the Manufacturing Industry," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 36-50.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9454-:d:1778760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.