IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9421-d1778315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Audit Quality Indicators Across Jurisdictions: Regulatory Diversity, ESG Integration, and Implications for Public Trust

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandros Garefalakis

    (Department of Business Administration and Tourism, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 714 10 Iraklio, Greece
    Department of Economics and Business, Neapolis University Pafos, Pafos 8042, Cyprus)

  • Ioannis Sitzimis

    (Department of Business Administration and Tourism, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 714 10 Iraklio, Greece)

  • Erasmia Angelaki

    (Department of Business Administration and Tourism, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 714 10 Iraklio, Greece)

  • Panagiotis Giannopoulos

    (School of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, 26 335 Patra, Greece)

  • Panagiotis Kyriakogkonas

    (Department of Public Administration, Panteion University of Political and Social Sciences, 176 71 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

Audit Quality Indicators (AQIs) have become vital tools for assessing and improving audit performance. This study examines how AQIs are defined, implemented, and interpreted across jurisdictions, with a particular focus on their integration into ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) assurance. Through a cross-jurisdictional comparison covering the EU, UK, US, and Canada, we analyze regulatory diversity and explore how different oversight models influence AQI adoption. Our findings reveal that AQIs play an increasingly important role not only in enhancing audit transparency but also in reinforcing the credibility of sustainability reporting under evolving frameworks like the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). However, implementation remains fragmented, and standardization challenges persist. The study offers empirical insights from a large-scale survey of audit professionals, highlighting how perceptions of audit quality vary by country, experience, and organizational context. We conclude that the harmonization of AQI frameworks, especially with ESG-focused metrics, is essential to foster public trust and ensure the accountability of sustainability assurance.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandros Garefalakis & Ioannis Sitzimis & Erasmia Angelaki & Panagiotis Giannopoulos & Panagiotis Kyriakogkonas, 2025. "Audit Quality Indicators Across Jurisdictions: Regulatory Diversity, ESG Integration, and Implications for Public Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-32, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9421-:d:1778315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9421/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9421/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hennig, Christian, 2007. "Cluster-wise assessment of cluster stability," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 258-271, September.
    2. Ionuț Viorel Herghiligiu & Ioan-Bogdan Robu & Marinela Istrate & Maria Grosu & Camelia Cătălina Mihalciuc & Adrian Vilcu, 2023. "Sustainable Corporate Performance Based on Audit Report Influence: An Empirical Approach through Financial Transparency and Gender Equality Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-28, September.
    3. Mika Vaihekoski & Habeeb Yahya, 2025. "Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Firm Valuation: The Moderating Role of Audit Quality," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Hammed Afolabi & Ronita Ram & Gunnar Rimmel, 2022. "Harmonization of Sustainability Reporting Regulation: Analysis of a Contested Arena," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Hebah Shalhoob, 2025. "ESG Disclosure and Financial Performance: Survey Evidence from Accounting and Islamic Finance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-26, February.
    6. repec:eme:jal000:j.acclit.2018.01.003 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Reiner Quick & Florian Schmidt, 2018. "Do audit firm rotation, auditor retention, and joint audits matter? – An experimental investigation of bank directors' and institutional investors' perceptions," Journal of Accounting Literature, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(1), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Quick, Reiner & Schmidt, Florian, 2018. "Do audit firm rotation, auditor retention, and joint audits matter? – An experimental investigation of bank directors' and institutional investors' perceptions," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-21.
    9. Howard, Matt C., 2023. "A systematic literature review of exploratory factor analyses in management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    10. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor size and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 183-199, December.
    11. Osama Samih Shaban & Abdallah Izzat Barakat, 2023. "Evaluation of Internal Audit Standards as a Foundation for Carrying out and Promoting a Wide Variety of Value-Added Tasks-Evidence from Emerging Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, March.
    12. Daqun Zhang & Donald R. Deis & Hsiao-Tang Hsu, 2025. "Pricing the Audit Risk of Innovation: Intangibles and Patents," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Quick, Reiner & Schmidt, F., 2018. "Do audit firm rotation, auditor retention, and joint audits matter? – An experimental investigation of bank directors' and institutional investors' perceptions," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 110650, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Friedrich, Christian & Quick, Reiner, 2024. "Do non-audit service failures impair auditor reputation? An analysis of KPMG advisory service scandals in Germany," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Munkaila Aminu & Bomi Cyril Nomlala & Kiran Baldavoo, 2024. "Examining Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation and Audit Quality in South Africa: Practitioner and Academic Perspectives," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 40-47, May.
    3. Dhouha Bouaziz, 2025. "Does External Audit Quality Moderate the Relationship Between CEO Entrenchment and Financial Communication Quality? Evidence from French Companies," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 15(3), pages 101-129.
    4. Garcia-Blandon, Josep & Argiles-Bosch, Josep Maria & Castillo-Merino, David & Martinez-Blasco, Monica, 2017. "An Assessment of the Provisions of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 on Non-audit Services and Audit Firm Tenure: Evidence from Spain," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 251-261.
    5. Smith, Deborah Drummond & Gleason, Kimberly C. & Kannan, Yezen H., 2021. "Auditor liability and excess cash holdings: Evidence from audit fees of foreign incorporated firms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. José Ramón Sánchez-Serrano & David Alaminos & Francisco García-Lagos & Angela M. Callejón-Gil, 2020. "Predicting Audit Opinion in Consolidated Financial Statements with Artificial Neural Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Patrick Velte, 2025. "Audit Quality and Materiality Disclosure Quality in Integrated Reporting: The Moderating Effect of Carbon Assurance Quality," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3785-3801, May.
    8. Lam, Kevin C.K. & Sami, Heibatollah & Zhou, Haiyan, 2013. "Changes in the value relevance of accounting information over time: Evidence from the emerging market of China," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 123-135.
    9. Abdullah, Azrul Bin, 2018. "Company-specific characteristics and the choice of hedge accounting for derivatives reporting: Malaysian case," SocArXiv npa6v, Center for Open Science.
    10. Steve Fortin & Ahmad Hammami & Michel Magnan, 2021. "Re‐exploring Fair Value Accounting and Value Relevance: An Examination of Underlying Securities," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(2), pages 220-250, June.
    11. Kitto, Andrew R., 2024. "The effects of non-Big 4 mergers on audit efficiency and audit market competition☆," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1).
    12. Md. Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan & Solomon Opare & Zahir Ahmed, 2024. "Does Audit Committee Busyness Affect Financial Restatement? Evidence from Audit Committee Share Ownership," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 34(1), pages 29-54, March.
    13. Chang, Yu-Shan & Chiang, Chia-Yu & Liu, Li-Lin (Sunny) & Xie, Xinmei (Lucy), 2019. "Audit partner independence and business affiliation: evidence from Taiwan," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Kristian D. Allee & Daniel D. Wangerin, 2018. "Auditor monitoring and verification in financial contracts: evidence from earnouts and SFAS 141(R)," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1629-1664, December.
    15. Nurul Nazlia Jamil, 2020. "The Power of Political Connections: Review on the Impacts of Audit Committee and Corporate Governance," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 333347-3333, December.
    16. Astrid Rudyanto, 2017. "Audit Firm Reputation versus Auditor Capability: Their Effect on Audit Quality in Indonesia," GATR Journals afr147, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    17. Hye‐Jeong Nam, 2018. "The Impact of Mandatory IFRS Transition on Audit Effort and Audit Fees: Evidence from Korea," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(4), pages 512-524, December.
    18. Alain Gilles FOKA TAGNE & Prince Dubois KENFACK HIKOUATCHA & Joséphine Florentine MBADUET & Joseph NDASSI YEPGNOU, 2018. "Qualité d’audit, concentration de l’actionnariat et reporting financier," Journal of Academic Finance, RED research unit, university of Gabes, Tunisia, vol. 9(1), pages 27-54, June.
    19. Hwang, Seokyoun & Sarath, Bharat & Han, Seung-youb, 2022. "Auditor independence: The effect of auditors’ quality control efforts and corporate governance," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    20. Gul, Ferdinand A. & Cheng, Louis T.W. & Leung, T.Y., 2011. "Perks and the informativeness of stock prices in the Chinese market," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 1410-1429.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9421-:d:1778315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.