IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9356-d1776524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Three-Stage Process for Sustainable Telework Adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Mario Aguilar-Fernández

    (Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Unidad Profesional Interdisciplinaria de Ingeniería y Ciencias Sociales y Administrativas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de Mexico 08400, Mexico)

  • Graciela Salgado-Escobar

    (Estudios Profesionales Genéricos, Unidad Profesional Interdisciplinaria de Ingeniería y Ciencias Sociales y Administrativas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de Mexico 08400, Mexico)

  • Luvis P. León-Romero

    (Postgraduate in Systems Engineering, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de Mexico 07738, Mexico)

  • Brenda García-Jarquín

    (Departamento de Posgrado, Instituto Tecnológico de Oaxaca, Oaxaca 68030, Mexico)

  • Misaela Francisco-Márquez

    (Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Unidad Profesional Interdisciplinaria de Ingeniería y Ciencias Sociales y Administrativas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de Mexico 08400, Mexico)

Abstract

In recent years, telework (TW) has been seen as a feasible and flexible alternative to deal with global and market risks; however, companies’ lack of vision and planning to implement it has generated the reality that TW, far from bringing advantages, generates personal and social labour conflicts. The objective of this research is to design a TW adoption sustainable process (TW-ASP) that guides the development of organizational strategies to maximize benefits and mitigate challenges for companies, employees, and society. This qualitative study comprises three phases: a review of previous research in Web of Science, identification and inter-relation of relevant variables, and TW-ASP design using Cooper’s stage-gate methodology. The process includes three stages, and each one has a gate: TW thinking, TW decision, and TW adoption. Each stage and gate is structured according to linkages between technological, organizational, labour, and social variables. TW-ASP positions TW as a sustainable initiative requiring a holistic and systemic approach. This study offers a proposal that can serve as a reference for designing organizational strategies aimed at sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario Aguilar-Fernández & Graciela Salgado-Escobar & Luvis P. León-Romero & Brenda García-Jarquín & Misaela Francisco-Márquez, 2025. "A Three-Stage Process for Sustainable Telework Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9356-:d:1776524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9356/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9356/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tahlyan, Divyakant & Said, Maher & Mahmassani, Hani & Stathopoulos, Amanda & Walker, Joan & Shaheen, Susan, 2022. "For whom did telework not work during the Pandemic? understanding the factors impacting telework satisfaction in the US using a multiple indicator multiple cause (MIMIC) model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 387-402.
    2. Carmen-Alexandra Stoian & Chirața Caraiani & Ionuț Florin Anica-Popa & Cornelia Dascălu & Camelia Iuliana Lungu, 2022. "Telework Systematic Model Design for the Future of Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Wang, Xinyi & Kim, Sung Hoo & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2024. "Identifying teleworking-related motives and comparing telework frequency expectations in the post-pandemic world: A latent class choice modeling approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    4. repec:eme:ws0000:00438020210418791 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Ana-Maria Zamfir & Anamaria Beatrice Aldea, 2020. "Digital skills and Labour Market Resilience," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 11(1Sup2), pages 188-195, May.
    6. Filomena Almeida & Helena Rodrigues & Patrícia Freitas, 2024. "“No Need to Dress to Impress” Evidence on Teleworking during and after the Pandemic: A Systematic Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-34, April.
    7. Groen, Bianca A.C. & van Triest, Sander P. & Coers, Michael & Wtenweerde, Neeke, 2018. "Managing flexible work arrangements: Teleworking and output controls," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 727-735.
    8. Magnus Moglia & John Hopkins & Anne Bardoel, 2021. "Telework, Hybrid Work and the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals: Towards Policy Coherence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    9. Halil Yorulmaz & Serkan Eti, 2024. "Building telework capability in the new business era for SMEs, using spherical fuzzy AHP methodology for prioritizing the actions," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Agota Giedrė Raišienė & Evelina Danauskė & Karolina Kavaliauskienė & Vida Gudžinskienė, 2023. "Occupational Stress-Induced Consequences to Employees in the Context of Teleworking from Home: A Preliminary Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    11. Itzhak Harpaz, 2002. "Advantages and disadvantages of telecommuting for the individual, organization and society," Work Study, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 51(2), pages 74-80, April.
    12. World Bank, 2024. "World Bank Group Sanctions System Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2024," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 42260.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ioana Gutu & Camelia Nicoleta Medeleanu, 2023. "Assessing Teleworkforce and Electronic Leadership Favorable for an Online Workforce Sustainability Framework by Using PLS SEM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-32, September.
    2. Carmen-Alexandra Stoian & Chirața Caraiani & Ionuț Florin Anica-Popa & Cornelia Dascălu & Camelia Iuliana Lungu, 2022. "Telework Systematic Model Design for the Future of Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Ioanna Simeli & Georgios Tsekouropoulos & Anastasia Vasileiou & Greta Hoxha, 2023. "Benefits and Challenges of Teleworking for a Sustainable Future: Knowledge Gained through Experience in the Era of COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-30, July.
    4. Angelica Nicoleta Neculaesei & Sebastian Tocar, 2023. "Determinants of Perceived Performance during Telework: Evidence from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Asmussen, Katherine E. & Mondal, Aupal & Bhat, Chandra R. & Pendyala, Ram M., 2023. "On modeling future workplace location decisions: An analysis of Texas employees," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Asmussen, Katherine E. & Mondal, Aupal & Batur, Irfan & Dirks, Abbie & Pendyala, Ram M. & Bhat, Chandra R., 2024. "An investigation of individual-level telework arrangements in the COVID-era," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    7. Wang, Xinyi & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2024. "Examining the treatment effect of teleworking on vehicle-miles driven: Applying an ordered probit selection model and incorporating the role of travel stress," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    8. Kappler, Laísa Braga & de Abreu e Silva, João, 2025. "Telework frequency and travel behaviour during the later stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study across different Metropolitan Areas: Lisbon, Istanbul, and Porto Alegre," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    9. Downes, Rebecca & Daellenbach, Urs & Donnelly, Noelle, 2023. "Remote control: Attitude monitoring and informal control in distributed teams," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Diego Bellini & Barbara Barbieri & Marina Mondo & Silvia De Simone & Silvia Marocco, 2025. "Sustainable Work–Life Balance, Social Support, and Workload: Exploring the Potential Dual Role of Flexible Work in a Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Emilio Bisetti & Benjamin Tengelsen & Ariel Zetlin‐Jones, 2022. "Moral Hazard In Remote Teams," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(4), pages 1595-1623, November.
    12. Andrei Georgian & Militaru Gheorghe, 2022. "The influence of telework on organizational performance: Evidence from Romania," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 887-893, August.
    13. Bruna Ferrara & Martina Pansini & Clara De Vincenzi & Ilaria Buonomo & Paula Benevene, 2022. "Investigating the Role of Remote Working on Employees’ Performance and Well-Being: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, September.
    14. Halil Yorulmaz & Serkan Eti, 2024. "Building telework capability in the new business era for SMEs, using spherical fuzzy AHP methodology for prioritizing the actions," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Chicheng Huang & Serhat Yüksel & Hasan Dinçer, 2025. "A Novel Fuzzy Model for Knowledge-Driven Process Optimization in Renewable Energy Projects," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 5183-5215, March.
    16. Carlos A. Arbelaez-Velasquez & Diana Giraldo & Santiago Quintero, 2022. "Analysis of a Teleworking Technology Adoption Case: An Agent-Based Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
    17. Rita Toleikienė & Vita Juknevičienė & Irma Rybnikova & Viktoria Menzel & Inese Abolina & Iveta Reinholde, 2024. "Main Challenges of E-Leadership in Municipal Administrations in the Post-Pandemic Context," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Mabel Andalon & Matthew Jones, 2022. "A simple model of working from home," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 25(2), pages 193-214.
    19. Colaço, Rui & Kappler, Laísa Braga & de Abreu e Silva, João, 2024. "Pandemic immobilities and consequences for commuting: Implications for mobility of COVID-19 mandatory telecommuting," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    20. Krzysztof Kubiak & Agata Branowska, 2021. "The Concept of Improvements in Management of Public Administration Officials Working from Home in Selected Educational Units," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 257-268.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9356-:d:1776524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.