IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9298-d1775228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decarbonising Agriculture with Green Hydrogen: A Stakeholder-Guided Feasibility Study

Author

Listed:
  • Pegah Mirzania

    (Cranfield Centre for Energy Systems and Strategy Cranfield University, Bedford, MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Da Huo

    (Cranfield Centre for Energy Systems and Strategy Cranfield University, Bedford, MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Nazmiye Balta-Ozkan

    (Cranfield Centre for Energy Systems and Strategy Cranfield University, Bedford, MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Niranjan Panigrahi

    (Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, Bedford, MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Jerry W. Knox

    (Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, Bedford, MK43 0AL, UK)

Abstract

Green hydrogen offers a promising yet underexplored pathway for agricultural decarbonisation, requiring technological readiness and coordinated action from policymakers, industry, and farmers. This paper integrates techno-economic modelling with stakeholder engagement (semi-structured interviews and an expert workshop) to assess its potential. Analyses were conducted for farms of 123 hectares and clusters of 10 farms, complemented by seven interviews and a workshop with nine sector experts. Findings show both opportunities and barriers. While on-farm hydrogen production is technically feasible, it remains economically uncompetitive due to high levelised costs, shaped by seasonal demand variability and low utilisation of electrolysers and storage. Pooling demand across multiple users is essential to improve cost-effectiveness. Stakeholders identified three potential business models: fertiliser production via ammonia synthesis, cooperative-based models, and local refuelling stations. Of these, cooperative hydrogen hubs emerged as the most promising, enabling clusters of farms to jointly invest in renewable-powered electrolysers, storage, and refuelling facilities, thereby reducing costs, extending participation to smaller farms, and mitigating risks through collective investment. By linking techno-economic feasibility with stakeholder perspectives and business model considerations, the results contribute to socio-technical transition theory by showing how technological, institutional, and social factors interact in shaping hydrogen adoption in agriculture. With appropriate policy support, cooperative hubs could lower costs, ease concerns over affordability and complexity, and position hydrogen as a practical driver of agricultural decarbonisation and rural resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Pegah Mirzania & Da Huo & Nazmiye Balta-Ozkan & Niranjan Panigrahi & Jerry W. Knox, 2025. "Decarbonising Agriculture with Green Hydrogen: A Stakeholder-Guided Feasibility Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-32, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9298-:d:1775228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9298/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9298/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mirzania, Pegah & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Ford, Andy, 2020. "An innovative viable model for community-owned solar PV projects without FIT: Comprehensive techno-economic assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    2. Mohsen Salimi & Morteza Hosseinpour & Tohid N.Borhani, 2022. "The Role of Clean Hydrogen Value Chain in a Successful Energy Transition of Japan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2022. "Beyond the triangle of renewable energy acceptance: The five dimensions of domestic hydrogen acceptance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    4. Ye Li & Clemens Kool & Peter-Jan Engelen, 2020. "Analyzing the Business Case for Hydrogen-Fuel Infrastructure Investments with Endogenous Demand in The Netherlands: A Real Options Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Hahn, Christoffer & Lindkvist, Emma & Magnusson, Dick & Johansson, Maria, 2025. "The role of agriculture in a sustainable energy system – The farmers’ perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    6. Wustenhagen, Rolf & Wolsink, Maarten & Burer, Mary Jean, 2007. "Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2683-2691, May.
    7. Shunichi Hienuki & Yoshie Hirayama & Tadahiro Shibutani & Junji Sakamoto & Jo Nakayama & Atsumi Miyake, 2019. "How Knowledge about or Experience with Hydrogen Fueling Stations Improves Their Public Acceptance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-12, November.
    8. Hailes, Oliver, 2023. "From Guano to green hydrogen: food security and fertilizer disputes in international energy law," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120985, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Halder, Pobitra & Babaie, Meisam & Salek, Farhad & Shah, Kalpit & Stevanovic, Svetlana & Bodisco, Timothy A. & Zare, Ali, 2024. "Performance, emissions and economic analyses of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    10. Marcella Calabrese & Maria Portarapillo & Alessandra Di Nardo & Virginia Venezia & Maria Turco & Giuseppina Luciani & Almerinda Di Benedetto, 2024. "Hydrogen Safety Challenges: A Comprehensive Review on Production, Storage, Transport, Utilization, and CFD-Based Consequence and Risk Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huan, Ning & Yamamoto, Toshiyuki & Sato, Hitomi & Sala, Roser & Goncalves, Lila, 2024. "Perceptions to connections: A multidimensional investigation of hydrogen acceptance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Maketo, Lydia & Ashworth, Peta, 2025. "Social acceptance of green hydrogen in European Union and the United Kingdom: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    3. Andrzej Kuranc & Agnieszka Dudziak & Tomasz Słowik, 2025. "Low-Carbon Hydrogen Production and Use on Farms: European and Global Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-27, October.
    4. Jan Hildebrand & Timo Kortsch & Irina Rau, 2025. "The Public Acceptance of Power-to-X Technologies—Results from Environmental–Psychological Research Using a Representative German Sample," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-25, July.
    5. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2022. "Homes of the future: Unpacking public perceptions to power the domestic hydrogen transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    6. Leila Aghlimoghadam, 2023. "Solar Business in an Oil-Rich Country? A Socio-Technical Investigation of Solar PV Businesses in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2023. "Price promises, trust deficits and energy justice: Public perceptions of hydrogen homes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    8. Buchner, Johannes & Menrad, Klaus & Decker, Thomas, 2025. "Public acceptance of green hydrogen production in Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    9. Lyhne, Ivar & Aaen, Sara Bjørn & Nielsen, Helle & Kørnøv, Lone & Larsen, Sanne Vammen, 2018. "Citizens’ self-mobilization, motivational factors, and the group of most engaged citizens: The case of a radioactive waste repository in Denmark," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 433-442.
    10. Hogan, Jessica L. & Warren, Charles R. & Simpson, Michael & McCauley, Darren, 2022. "What makes local energy projects acceptable? Probing the connection between ownership structures and community acceptance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    11. Ioannidis, Romanos & Koutsoyiannis, Demetris, 2020. "A review of land use, visibility and public perception of renewable energy in the context of landscape impact," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    12. Kaufmann, Nicholas & Carolus, Thomas & Starzmann, Ralf, 2019. "Turbines for modular tidal current energy converters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 451-460.
    13. P.W.J. de Bijl & Helanya Fourie, 2019. "The energy transition: Does ownership matter for realizing public interest objectives?," Working Papers 19-24, Utrecht School of Economics.
    14. Dugstad, Anders & Grimsrud, Kristine & Kipperberg, Gorm & Lindhjem, Henrik & Navrud, Ståle, 2020. "Acceptance of wind power development and exposure – Not-in-anybody's-backyard," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    15. Vringer, Kees & Carabain, Christine L., 2020. "Measuring the legitimacy of energy transition policy in the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    16. Dey, Subhashish & Sreenivasulu, Anduri & Veerendra, G.T.N. & Rao, K. Venkateswara & Babu, P.S.S. Anjaneya, 2022. "Renewable energy present status and future potentials in India: An overview," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 1(1).
    17. Evangelos Tsiaras & Stergios Tampekis & Costas Gavrilakis, 2025. "Public Perceptions and Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Projects in Epirus, Greece: The Role of Education, Demographics and Visual Exposure," World, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-16, August.
    18. Gottschamer, L. & Zhang, Q., 2016. "Interactions of factors impacting implementation and sustainability of renewable energy sourced electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 164-174.
    19. Briguglio, Marie & Formosa, Glenn, 2017. "When households go solar: Determinants of uptake of a Photovoltaic Scheme and policy insights," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 154-162.
    20. Burghard, Uta & Breitschopf, Barbara & Wohlfarth, Katharina & Müller, Fabian & Keil, Julia, 2021. "Perception of monetary and non-monetary effects on the energy transition: Results of a mixed method approach," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S04/2021, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9298-:d:1775228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.