IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i1p328-d1560047.html

The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Farmland Non-Point Source Pollution: Evidence from the Dongting Lake Plain, China

Author

Listed:
  • Gaohui Wen

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

  • Liwen Yang

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

  • Xinyao Zhang

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

  • Yi Zhou

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

  • Hao Zhou

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

  • Xianhui Hu

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

Abstract

Non-point source pollution from agricultural land use is a significant contributor to environmental pollution, causing serious threats to water, air, and soil quality. Environmental regulations have been shown to have a significant negative effect on pollutant emissions. However, empirical studies examining the impact of agricultural environmental regulations on cultivated land non-point source pollution are limited. To explore the effects of environmental regulations on cultivated land non-point source pollution, this study focuses on the Dongting Lake Plain. Using statistical data from 2010 to 2020, we analyze the temporal and spatial changes in cultivated land non-point source pollution before and after the implementation of the “Zero Growth of Fertilizer and Pesticide Use Action Plan”. A spatial econometric model is used to assess the impact of environmental regulations on pollution. The results indicate that non-point source pollution in the Dongting Lake Plain shows positive global spatial autocorrelation. Locally, in 2010 and 2015, high-high clusters were dominant, while low-low clusters were less common. By 2020, low-low clusters became the main pattern of pollution. The introduction of the Zero Growth Action Plan had a negative impact on pollution intensity within the region and positive spillover effects on neighboring areas. In terms of emission structure, the plan significantly reduced nitrogen emission intensity and pesticide loss, but had a positive impact on phosphorus emissions. The level of regional economic development had a significant negative effect on pollution intensity, while urbanization had a positive effect. Agricultural technological progress showed a negative spatial spillover effect on phosphorus emissions, and regional economic development had a negative spatial spillover effect on nitrogen and pesticide emissions. This study provides evidence of the impact of environmental regulations on cultivated land non-point source pollution and offers valuable insights for the development of future pollution control policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaohui Wen & Liwen Yang & Xinyao Zhang & Yi Zhou & Hao Zhou & Xianhui Hu, 2025. "The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Farmland Non-Point Source Pollution: Evidence from the Dongting Lake Plain, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:328-:d:1560047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/328/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/328/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weikun Zhang & Peng Gao & Zhe Chen & Hailan Qiu, 2023. "Preventing Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution in China: The Effect of Environmental Regulation with Digitization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Neves, Sónia Almeida & Marques, António Cardoso & Patrício, Margarida, 2020. "Determinants of CO2 emissions in European Union countries: Does environmental regulation reduce environmental pollution?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 114-125.
    3. Allen Blackman & Zhengyan Li & Antung A. Liu, 2018. "Efficacy of Command-and-Control and Market-Based Environmental Regulation in Developing Countries," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 10(1), pages 381-404, October.
    4. Arimura, Toshi H. & Kaneko, Shinji & Managi, Shunsuke & Shinkuma, Takayoshi & Yamamoto, Masashi & Yoshida, Yuichiro, 2019. "Political economy of voluntary approaches: A lesson from environmental policies in Japan," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 41-53.
    5. Dayong Huang & Yangyang Zhu & Qiuyue Yu, 2022. "Spatial Spillover Effects of Agricultural Agglomeration on Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution in the Yangtze River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-26, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Rui & Fang, Debin & Xu, Jiajun, 2024. "Does China's carbon inclusion policy promote household carbon emissions reduction? Theoretical mechanisms and empirical evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Carrilho-Nunes, Inês & Catalão-Lopes, Margarida, 2022. "The effects of environmental policy and technology transfer on GHG emissions: The case of Portugal," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 255-264.
    3. Julien Guyot & Akhil Rao & Sebastien Rouillon, 2022. "The long-run economics of sustainable orbit use," Working Papers hal-03891292, HAL.
    4. Yan Li & Kailu Zhang & Bojiao Mu & Xinran Mo, 2024. "The long-term effects of transformation and upgrading policies on the market performance of China's coal-fire power generation industry," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(7), pages 1-38, October.
    5. Shah, Asad Abbas & Zha, Donglan, 2025. "Economy-wide estimates of the energy rebound effect in BRICS: The role of environmental regulations and economic policy uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    6. Abdullah Banikhalid & Michel Rahbeh, 2024. "The Role of the Law in Prompting Environmental Stewardship for Farms Located Near Phosphate Mines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Yelin Dai & Yue Liu & Xuhui Ding & Chundu Wu & Yu Chen, 2022. "Environmental Regulation Promotes Eco-Efficiency through Industrial Transfer: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-31, August.
    8. Wang, Weilong & Wang, Jianlong & Wu, Haitao, 2024. "The impact of energy-consuming rights trading on green total factor productivity in the context of digital economy: Evidence from listed firms in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. Po Kou & Ying Han & Xiaoyuan Qi & Yuanxian Li, 2022. "Does China's policy of carbon emission trading deliver sulfur dioxide reduction co-benefits?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 6224-6245, May.
    10. Yunzhao, Lu, 2022. "Modelling the role of eco innovation, renewable energy, and environmental taxes in carbon emissions reduction in E−7 economies: Evidence from advance panel estimations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 309-318.
    11. Maryam Aziz & Muhammad Zeeshan Shaukat & Abdul Aziz Khan Niazi & Abdul Basit & Tehmina Fiaz Qazi, 2023. "Wavelet Analysis of CO2 Emissions’ Co-movement: An Investigation of Lead–lag Effect among Emerging Asian Economies," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(3), pages 36-51.
    12. Blackman, Allen & Qin, Ping & Yang, Jun, 2020. "How costly are driving restrictions? Contingent valuation evidence from Beijing," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    13. Shahnazi, Rouhollah & Dehghan Shabani, Zahra, 2021. "The effects of renewable energy, spatial spillover of CO2 emissions and economic freedom on CO2 emissions in the EU," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 293-307.
    14. Kedong Yin & Lu Liu & Chong Huang & Yuqing Xiao, 2023. "Can the transfer of polluting industries achieve a win–win situation for both the economy and the environment? Research based on the perspective of environmental regulation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8903-8928, August.
    15. Xiaolin Wang & Zhenyang Li, 2024. "Re-Examination of the Relationship between Industrial Agglomeration and Haze Pollution: From the Perspective of the Spatial Moderating Effect of Environmental Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Tsalis, Thomas A. & Nikolaou, Ioannis E. & Konstantakopoulou, Fotini & Zhang, Ying & Evangelinos, Konstantinos I., 2020. "Evaluating the corporate environmental profile by analyzing corporate social responsibility reports," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 63-75.
    17. Oktay Özkan & Hephzibah Onyeje Obekpa & Andrew Adewale Alola, 2025. "Examining the nexus of energy intensity, renewables, natural resources, and carbon intensity in India," Energy & Environment, , vol. 36(1), pages 168-186, February.
    18. Li Sun & Sitong Wang & Jinqiu Wang, 2025. "Energy–Environment–Industry Intersection: Rural and Urban Inequity and Approach to Just Transition," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, May.
    19. Owusu, Solomon & Tang, Keyi & Ndubuisi, Gideon, 2025. "Chinese ties and low carbon industrialization in Africa," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    20. repec:osf:osfxxx:d2xsk_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Stubenrauch, Jessica & Garske, Beatrice, 2023. "Forest protection in the EU's renewable energy directive and nature conservation legislation in light of the climate and biodiversity crisis – Identifying legal shortcomings and solutions," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:328-:d:1560047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.