IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v37y2026i1p336-361.html

Role of Environmental Policy Stringency on Sectoral CO2 Emissions in EU-5 Countries: Disaggregated Level Evidence by Novel Quantile-Based Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Mustafa Tevfik Kartal
  • Dervis Kirikkaleli
  • Ugur Korkut Pata

Abstract

Consistent with the increasing awareness of environmental problems, countries have applied various measures to combat climate change by preventing environmental degradation of the environment. In this context, a set of measures in different areas and sectors have been taken. Although it is possible to consider each of them, instead, using a more comprehensive index, such as the Environmental Policy Stringency Index, can be appropriate in examining the effects of environmental measures in curbing emissions. Accordingly, this research examines the effect of Environmental Policy Stringency Index on sectoral carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions in the European Union Five countries (namely, Germany, Spain, France, United Kingdom, and Italy) by using data for the period 1990/Q2-2020/Q4, performing novel quantile-based approaches. The outcomes show that at higher quantiles, Environmental Policy Stringency Index provides (a) a decrease in building sector CO 2 emissions in France, the United Kingdom, and Italy; (b) a decline in industrial combustion sector CO 2 emissions in France and Italy; (c) a curb power sector CO 2 emissions in Germany, Spain, and France; (d) a decrease in transport sector CO 2 emission in Germany and France; (e) there are causalities from Environmental Policy Stringency Index to sectoral CO 2 emissions across quantiles except for some ones; (f) the outcomes are verified as robust. The outcomes prove the differentiating effects of Environmental Policy Stringency Index across sectors under the empirical examinations, quantiles, and countries. Thus, the study discusses various policy endeavors, such as consideration of the varying structure of environmental measures, application of nonlinear approaches, and focusing on some sectors to go fast in curbing sectoral CO 2 emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mustafa Tevfik Kartal & Dervis Kirikkaleli & Ugur Korkut Pata, 2026. "Role of Environmental Policy Stringency on Sectoral CO2 Emissions in EU-5 Countries: Disaggregated Level Evidence by Novel Quantile-Based Approaches," Energy & Environment, , vol. 37(1), pages 336-361, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:37:y:2026:i:1:p:336-361
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X241241026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X241241026
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X241241026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neves, Sónia Almeida & Marques, António Cardoso & Patrício, Margarida, 2020. "Determinants of CO2 emissions in European Union countries: Does environmental regulation reduce environmental pollution?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 114-125.
    2. Sami Ullah & Rundong Luo & Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Mustafa Tevfik Kartal, 2023. "Dynamics between environmental taxes and ecological sustainability: Evidence from top‐seven green economies by novel quantile approaches," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 825-839, April.
    3. Chang, Yen-Chiang & Wang, Nannan, 2010. "Environmental regulations and emissions trading in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3356-3364, July.
    4. Grossman, G.M & Krueger, A.B., 1991. "Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement," Papers 158, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Public and International Affairs.
    5. Erik Frohm & Filippo Maria D’Arcangelo & Tobias Kruse & Mauro Pisu & Urban Sila, 2023. "Environmental policy stringency and CO2 emissions: Evidence from cross-country sector-level data," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1773, OECD Publishing.
    6. Sim, Nicholas & Zhou, Hongtao, 2015. "Oil prices, US stock return, and the dependence between their quantiles," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1-8.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksandra Pavlović & Milica Njegovan & Andrea Ivanišević & Mladen Radišić & Aleksandar Takači & Alpar Lošonc & Sebastian Kot, 2021. "The Impact of Foreign Direct Investments and Economic Growth on Environmental Degradation: The Case of the Balkans," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Shokoohi, Zeinab & Dehbidi, Navid Kargar & Tarazkar, Mohammad Hassan, 2022. "Energy intensity, economic growth and environmental quality in populous Middle East countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    3. Liu, Yang & Dong, Kangyin & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2023. "How does energy aid mitigate the recipient countries’ carbon emissions?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 359-375.
    4. Muhamadu Awal Kindzeka Wirajing & Roger Tsafack Nanfosso & Armand Mboutchouang Kountchou, 2025. "Examining the environmental tax and the fishing grounds footprint nexus: Case of the African fishing industry," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(3), pages 2130-2154, August.
    5. Farrukh Shahzad & Zeeshan Fareed & Yong Wan & Yihan Wang & Zohaib Zahid & Muhammad Irfan, 2023. "Examining the asymmetric link between clean energy intensity and carbon dioxide emissions: The significance of quantile-on-quantile method," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(6), pages 1884-1909, September.
    6. Shahnazi, Rouhollah & Dehghan Shabani, Zahra, 2021. "The effects of renewable energy, spatial spillover of CO2 emissions and economic freedom on CO2 emissions in the EU," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 293-307.
    7. Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Seyi Saint Akadiri & Joshua Sunday Riti & Ada Tony Odu, 2023. "Interaction among geopolitical risk, trade openness, economic growth, carbon emissions and Its implication on climate change in india," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(5), pages 1305-1326, August.
    8. Ojonugwa Usman & Oktay Ozkan & Ibrahim Adeshola & Babatunde Sunday Eweade, 2025. "Analysing the nexus between clean energy expansion, natural resource extraction, and load capacity factor in China: a step towards achieving COP27 targets," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 12583-12604, June.
    9. Burgi,Constantin Rudolf Salomo & Hovhannisyan,Shoghik & Joshi,Santosh Ram & Ahmad Famm Alkhuzam, 2022. "Informal Emissions," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10158, The World Bank.
    10. Haider Mahmood & Ateeq ur Rehman Irshad & Muhammad Tanveer, 2024. "Do innovation and renewable energy transition play their role in environmental sustainability in Western Europe?," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    11. Mustafa Tevfik Kartal & Hasan Murat Ertuğrul & Dilvin Taşkın & Fatih Ayhan, 2024. "Asymmetric nexus of coal consumption with environmental quality and economic growth: Evidence from BRICS, E7, and Fragile Five countries by novel quantile approaches," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(4), pages 2228-2247, June.
    12. İbrahim Özmen & Mihai Mutascu, 2025. "Don’t look earth: environmental taxes effect on Co2 emissions, evidence from moments quantile regression for EU countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 4619-4658, February.
    13. Ullah, Sami & Boulanouar, Zakaria & Meo, Muhammad Saeed & Ali, Kishwar, 2025. "Navigating sustainable mobility: Wavelet insights into carbon emissions in Germany's transportation sector," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 120-136.
    14. Su, Chi-Wei & Pang, Li-Dong & Tao, Ran & Shao, Xuefeng & Umar, Muhammad, 2022. "Renewable energy and technological innovation: Which one is the winner in promoting net-zero emissions?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    15. Kun Chen & Yinrong Chen & Qingying Zhu & Min Liu, 2022. "The Relationship between Environmental Regulation, Industrial Transformation Change and Urban Low-Carbon Development: Evidence from 282 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, October.
    16. Huang, Anzhong & Dai, Luote & Ali, Sajid & Nazar, Raima & Anser, Muhammad Khalid, 2025. "Zero-emission vision: The role of E-mobility technology budgets in carbon mitigation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 265-280.
    17. Hammed Oluwaseyi Musibau & Maria Yanotti & Joaquin Vespignani & Rabindra Nepal, 2020. "The moderating role of green energy and energy-innovation in environmental Kuznets: Insights from quantile-quantile analysis," CAMA Working Papers 2020-39, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    18. Gravina, Antonio Francesco & Lanzafame, Matteo, 2025. "‘What's your shape?’ A data-driven approach to estimating the Environmental Kuznets Curve," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    19. Mustafa Naimoğlu & Andrew Adewale Alola, 2025. "Analyzing environmental delivery of industrial technology and energy use-loss in China," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Barra, Cristian & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Giganti, Patrizio, 2025. "Exploring the impact of economic, climate, and energy policy uncertainty on the Environmental Kuznets Curve: International evidence," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:37:y:2026:i:1:p:336-361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.