IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8866-d1764772.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thriving in Internal CSR-Driven Service Organisations: The Role of Embeddedness, Moral Meaningfulness and Intrapreneurship

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Edip

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Cyprus International University, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, Nicosia 99258, Turkey)

  • Georgiana Karadas

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Cyprus International University, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, Nicosia 99258, Turkey)

Abstract

In service-intensive, compliance-driven settings such as banking, identifying how internal corporate social responsibility (ICSR) fosters employees’ vitality and learning is crucial for sustainable organisational performance. Amid growing interest in employee thriving, this study explores how perceived internal corporate social responsibility (PICSR) and moral meaningfulness (MM) shape thriving at work (TaW) through organisational embeddedness (OE). Rooted in self-determination theory, the findings reveal OE as a key mediator between PICSR and TaW, shedding light on how ICSR initiatives influence employee dynamics. The study also reveals that MM alone does not significantly predict TaW directly, but does so indirectly through OE, highlighting the importance of contextual mechanisms. Additionally, it identifies a surprising negative moderating effect of risk-taking, one dimension of intrapreneurial behaviour (IB), on the relationship between OE and TaW, while innovativeness, another dimension, shows no such effect. Theoretical and practical implications underscore the importance of aligning ICSR practices with employees’ psychological needs, supporting moral alignment, and tailoring support for intrapreneurs. Organisations must achieve a balance between autonomy and security to sustain engagement and innovation, advancing human and organisational sustainability, ultimately leading to thriving.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Edip & Georgiana Karadas, 2025. "Thriving in Internal CSR-Driven Service Organisations: The Role of Embeddedness, Moral Meaningfulness and Intrapreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-23, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8866-:d:1764772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8866/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8866/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nada Alwahhabi & Suad Dukhaykh & Wadi B. Alonazi, 2023. "Thriving at Work as a Mediator of the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Jonathan Lowell, 2012. "Managers and Moral Dissonance: Self Justification as a Big Threat to Ethical Management?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 17-25, January.
    3. Erifili-Christina Chatzopoulou & Dimitris Manolopoulos & Vasia Agapitou, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Outcomes: Interrelations of External and Internal Orientations with Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 795-817, September.
    4. S. Sethi & Donald Schepers, 2014. "United Nations Global Compact: The Promise–Performance Gap," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(2), pages 193-208, June.
    5. Duygu Turker, 2009. "How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Organizational Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(2), pages 189-204, October.
    6. Gretchen Spreitzer & Kathleen Sutcliffe & Jane Dutton & Scott Sonenshein & Adam M. Grant, 2005. "A Socially Embedded Model of Thriving at Work," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 537-549, October.
    7. Sung-Hoon Ko & Yongjun Choi & Jongsung Kim & Hyun Chul Kang, 2023. "Employees’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility and Their Extra-Role Behaviors: A Psychological Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Enoch Opare Mintah & Mahmoud Elmarzouky, 2024. "Digital-Platform-Based Ecosystems: CSR Innovations during Crises," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-23, June.
    9. Norberth Okros & Delia Vîrgă, 2022. "How to Increase Job Satisfaction and Performance? Start with Thriving: The Serial Mediation Effect of Psychological Capital and Burnout," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-12, June.
    10. M. Isabel Sánchez-Hernández & Jose Luis Vázquez-Burguete & Maria P. García-Miguélez & Ana Lanero-Carrizo, 2021. "Internal Corporate Social Responsibility for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Glavas, Ante & Kelley, Ken, 2014. "The Effects of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 165-202, April.
    12. Sun, Yuan & Zhong, Yating & Jeyaraj, Anand & Zhu, Mengjie, 2024. "The impact of enterprise social media affordances on employees' thriving at work: An empowerment theory perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    13. Gawke, Jason C. & Gorgievski, Marjan J. & Bakker, Arnold B., 2019. "Measuring intrapreneurship at the individual level: Development and validation of the Employee Intrapreneurship Scale (EIS)," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 806-817.
    14. Mavis Adu-Gyamfi & Zheng He & Gabriel Nyame & Seth Boahen & Michelle Frempomaa Frempong, 2021. "Effects of Internal CSR Activities on Social Performance: The Employee Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-28, June.
    15. Petra C. M. Neessen & Marjolein C. J. Caniëls & Bart Vos & Jeroen P. Jong, 2019. "The intrapreneurial employee: toward an integrated model of intrapreneurship and research agenda," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 545-571, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paraskevi (Evi) Dekoulou & Anna Anastasopoulou & Panagiotis Trivellas, 2023. "Employee Performance Implications of CSR for Organizational Resilience in the Banking Industry: The Mediation Role of Psychological Empowerment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Huynh Thi Thuy Giang & Luu Tien Dung, 2022. "The effect of internal corporate social responsibility practices on firm performance: the mediating role of employee intrapreneurial behaviour," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1035-1061, May.
    3. Milica Slijepčević & Nevenka Popović Šević & Jelena Krstić & Tamara Rajić & Milan Ranković, 2024. "Exploring the Nexus of Perceived Organizational CSR Engagement, Job Satisfaction, Organizational Pride, and Involvement in CSR Activities: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Oscar Licandro & Pedro Severino-González & Luis Ortigueira-Sánchez & Iván Veas-González & Patricia Correa & Pool Trigos-Tapia & Violeta Rojas-Bravo & Tomy Villanueva-Arequipeño & Guipsy Rebolledo-Abur, 2025. "Job Satisfaction as a Factor That Moderates the Relationship Between Internal Social Responsibility and Organizational Commitment: A Structural Equation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Huang, Miaojia & Geng, Shuang & Yang, Wen & Law, Kris M.Y. & He, Yuqin, 2024. "Going beyond the role: How employees' perception of corporate social responsibility fuels proactive customer service performance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Castaldo, Sandro & Ciacci, Andrea & Penco, Lara, 2023. "Perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction in grocery retail: A comparison between low- and high-productivity stores," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    7. Jiali Chen & Aiqing Zhang, 2023. "Exploring How and When Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Impacts Employees’ Green Innovative Work Behavior: The Mediating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy and Environmental Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Seunghee Im & Yang Woon Chung & Ji Yeon Yang, 2016. "Employees’ Participation in Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Person–CSR Fit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Salih Börteçine Avci & Adnan Karataş, 2022. "Public Service Motivation’s Mediating Role in the Effect Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Justice Have on Organizational Commitment in Higher Education Institutions," Journal of Economy Culture and Society, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 66(66), pages 29-54, December.
    10. Tahir Farid & Sadaf Iqbal & Jianhong Ma & Sandra Castro-González & Amira Khattak & Muhammad Khalil Khan, 2019. "Employees’ Perceptions of CSR, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Effects of Organizational Justice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, May.
    11. Teng Yue Liang & Sung Joon Yoon, 2023. "The Effect of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility (PCSR) on Subjective Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Perrin Moss & Nicole Hartley & Trevor Russell, 2022. "Integration intrapreneurship: implementing innovation in a public healthcare organization," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Chen Ma & Yasir Latif, 2022. "How to Improve Employee Psychological Well-Being? CSR as a Sustainable Way," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Sabeen Hussain Bhatti & Kamran Iqbal & Gabriele Santoro & Fabio Rizzato, 2022. "The impact of corporate social responsibility directed toward employees on contextual performance in the banking sector: A serial model of perceived organizational support and affective organizational," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 1980-1994, November.
    15. Christoph Harrach & Sonja Geiger & Ulf Schrader, 2020. "Sustainability empowerment in the workplace: determinants and effects," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 93-107, December.
    16. Matthias Gotsch & Carsten Gandenberger & Luisa Serafimov & Mathias Miemiec, 2023. "Top‐down and bottom‐up strategies for the implementation of corporate social responsibility: A qualitative survey of an international IT services company," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1645-1663, July.
    17. Princewill Osaro Omorogiuwa, 2023. "Examining the Effects of the Antecedents of the Theory of Planned Behavior on Intrapreneurial Intention and the Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Support," SBS Journal of Applied Business Research (SBS-JABR), SBS Swiss Business School, vol. 11, pages 19-42.
    18. Iffat Rasool & Ansir Rajput, 2017. "The Impact of Perceived Internal Corporate Social Responsibility on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Micro-Perspective Analysis," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 9(1), pages 181-201, March.
    19. Heung-Jun Jung & Mohammad Ali, 2017. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Organizational Justice and Positive Employee Attitudes: In the Context of Korean Employment Relations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-24, October.
    20. Sabrina Scheidler & Laura Marie Edinger-Schons & Jelena Spanjol & Jan Wieseke, 2019. "Scrooge Posing as Mother Teresa: How Hypocritical Social Responsibility Strategies Hurt Employees and Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 339-358, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8866-:d:1764772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.