IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8640-d1758365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Coordinated Two-Way FDI Development on Carbon Emissions in Belt and Road Countries: An Empirical Analysis Based on the STIRPAT Model and GMM Estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Linyue Li

    (School of International Trade and Economics, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 102206, China
    Claremont Institute for Economic Policy Studies, Claremont, CA 91711, USA)

  • Yikai Wang

    (School of International Trade and Economics, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) promotes significant cross-border investment, raising critical questions about its environmental consequences, particularly regarding carbon emissions. This paper uses panel data from 47 countries that participated in the “Belt and Road Initiative” earlier from 2000 to 2020 to conduct theoretical analysis and empirical research on the relationship between the coordinated development of two-way FDI and carbon emission intensity, dividing it into scale effect, technology effect and structure effect. The coordinated development of two-way FDI can have an increasing or decreasing impact on carbon emission intensity through these three effects. The main findings of this paper are as follows: (1) The improvement of the degree of coordinated development of two-way FDI significantly reduces carbon emission intensity. (2) The improvement of the degree of coordinated development of two-way FDI can enhance the level of technological innovation, while the improvement of the level of technological innovation will increase carbon emission intensity, thereby reducing the carbon emission reduction effect of the coordinated development of two-way FDI. (3) The improvement of the degree of coordinated development of two-way FDI can reduce carbon emission intensity by promoting the upgrading of industrial structure. Based on the above conclusions, this paper puts forward the following suggestions for the subsequent development of countries along the “Belt and Road”: (1) Further increase two-way FDI and promote the coordinated development of two-way FDI. (2) Promote the upgrading of industrial structure and the green transformation of technology. (3) Increase economic freedom to provide a good environment for economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Linyue Li & Yikai Wang, 2025. "The Impact of Coordinated Two-Way FDI Development on Carbon Emissions in Belt and Road Countries: An Empirical Analysis Based on the STIRPAT Model and GMM Estimation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-25, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8640-:d:1758365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8640/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8640/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ying Nie & Qingjie Liu & Rong Liu & Dexiao Ren & Yao Zhong & Feng Yu, 2022. "The Threshold Effect of FDI on CO 2 Emission in Belt and Road Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Aco Benović & Miroslav Miškić & Vladan Pantović & Slađana Vujičić & Dejan Vidojević & Mladen Opačić & Filip Jovanović, 2025. "Assessment of the Impact of Solar Power Integration and AI Technologies on Sustainable Local Development: A Case Study from Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Ihtisham ul Haq & Bahtiyar Mehmed & Sisira Kumara Naradda Gamage & Piratdin Allayarov & Dilawar Khan & Zeeshan Zaib Khattak, 2022. "Nexus between export variety and carbon emissions in Pakistan: The role of FDI and technological development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Jeongmi Ga & Jaewoo Bong & Myeongjun Yu & Minjung Kwak, 2025. "Digital Enablers of Sustainability: Insights from Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Research Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-27, August.
    5. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Zhao, Ya-Nan, 2023. "Heterogeneity analysis of factors influencing CO2 emissions: The role of human capital, urbanization, and FDI," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    6. Sorrell, Steve, 2009. "Jevons' Paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1456-1469, April.
    7. Zeki Keşanlı & Feriha Dikmen Deliceırmak & Mehdi Seraj, 2025. "The Impact of Technology, Economic Development, Environmental Quality, Safety, and Exchange Rate on the Tourism Performance in European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Walter Antonio Abujder Ochoa & Angela Gabriela Torrico Arce & Alfredo Iarozinski Neto & Mayara Regina Munaro & Oriana Palma Calabokis & Vladimir A. Ballesteros-Ballesteros, 2025. "Interlinking Urban Sustainability, Circular Economy and Complexity: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-26, August.
    9. Muhammad Uzair Ali & Ying Wang, 2024. "Does the Participation Degree in Global Value Chains Influence Carbon Emission Transfer Through International Trade in Belt and Road Countries?," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 59(3), pages 369-388, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen, Chen & Xing, Yuhang & Wang, Tao & Liao, Sheng & Gao, Ke, 2025. "How do green supply chain management and renewable energy consumption influence carbon emissions in China and India? A comparative analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Xi Liu & Yugang He & Renhong Wu, 2024. "Revolutionizing Environmental Sustainability: The Role of Renewable Energy Consumption and Environmental Technologies in OECD Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Steffen Dalsgaard, 2022. "Can IT Resolve the Climate Crisis? Sketching the Role of an Anthropology of Digital Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Catalin VRABIE, 2024. "Guvernarea electronică 3.0: Un model AI de soluționare automatizată a petițiilor," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 12, pages 9-28, september.
    5. Bekhzod Kuziboev & Ergash Ibadullaev & Olimjon Saidmamatov & Alibek Rajabov & Peter Marty & Sherzodbek Ruzmetov & Alisher Sherov, 2023. "The Role of Renewable Energy and Human Capital in Reducing Environmental Degradation in Europe and Central Asia: Panel Quantile Regression and GMM Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-12, November.
    6. Lange, Steffen & Pohl, Johanna & Santarius, Tilman, 2020. "Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    7. Maccarrone, Giovanni & Marini, Marco A. & Tarola, Ornella, "undated". "Shop Until You Drop: the Unexpected Effects of Anticonsumerism and Environmentalism," FEEM Working Papers 330384, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    8. Hong, Sanghyun & Bradshaw, Corey J.A. & Brook, Barry W., 2014. "South Korean energy scenarios show how nuclear power can reduce future energy and environmental costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 569-578.
    9. Karen Turner, 2013. ""Rebound" Effects from Increased Energy Efficiency: A Time to Pause and Reflect," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4).
    10. Florian Fizaine & Victor Court, 2016. "The energy-economic growth relationship: a new insight from the EROI perspective," Working Papers 1601, Chaire Economie du climat.
    11. Ouyang, Xiaoling & Gao, Beiying & Du, Kerui & Du, Gang, 2018. "Industrial sectors' energy rebound effect: An empirical study of Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 408-416.
    12. Liu, Yaobin & Deng, Weifeng & Wen, Huwei & Li, Shuoshuo, 2024. "Promoting green technology innovation through policy synergy: Evidence from the dual pilot policy of low-carbon city and innovative city," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 957-977.
    13. Donglan Zha & Qian Chen & Jaume Freire González, 2023. "The Gap between Expectations and Reality: Assessing the Water Rebound Effect in Chinese Agriculture," Working Papers 1415, Barcelona School of Economics.
    14. Charlier, Dorothée & Legendre, Bérangère, 2021. "Fuel poverty in industrialized countries: Definition, measures and policy implications a review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    15. Aldona Standar & Agnieszka Kozera & Łukasz Satoła, 2021. "The Importance of Local Investments Co-Financed by the European Union in the Field of Renewable Energy Sources in Rural Areas of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, January.
    16. El Tinay, Hassan & Schor, Juliet B., 2025. "Do economists think about climate change and inequality? Semantic analysis and topic modeling of top five economics journals," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    17. Matthew K. Heun & João Santos & Paul E. Brockway & Randall Pruim & Tiago Domingos & Marco Sakai, 2017. "From Theory to Econometrics to Energy Policy: Cautionary Tales for Policymaking Using Aggregate Production Functions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-44, February.
    18. Sebestyénné Szép, Tekla, 2018. "A hatósági árcsökkentés lakossági energiafelhasználásra gyakorolt hatásának vizsgálata indexdekompozícióval [Analysing the effects of utility-cost reduction on household energy consumption, using i," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 185-205.
    19. Wei Deng & Qingquan Liang & Shuai Yan & Xiaodan Shen & Lan Yi, 2024. "Heterogeneity Analysis of Regional Greenhouse Gas Driving Effects: An Empirical Study from Southeast Asian Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-22, November.
    20. Guo, Qingbin & Peng, Yanqing & Luo, Kang, 2025. "The impact of artificial intelligence on energy environmental performance: Empirical evidence from cities in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8640-:d:1758365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.