IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8470-d1754484.html

Integrating InVEST and MaxEnt Models for Ecosystem Service Network Optimization in Island Cities: Evidence from Pingtan Island, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jinyan Liu

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 63 Xiyuangong Rd., Fuzhou 350002, China
    College of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Quanzhou Normal University, 398 Donghai Rd., Quanzhou 362000, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Bowen Jin

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 63 Xiyuangong Rd., Fuzhou 350002, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jianwen Dong

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 63 Xiyuangong Rd., Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Guochang Ding

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 63 Xiyuangong Rd., Fuzhou 350002, China)

Abstract

As unique geographical entities, island cities boast abundant ecological resources and profound cultural values, serving as critical hubs for maintaining ecosystem services in coastal transition zones. Ensuring the stability of ecosystem services is strategically significant for sustainable urban development, while the construction of Ecosystem Service Networks (ESNs) has emerged as a core strategy to enhance ecological functionality and mitigate systemic risks. Based on current research gaps, this study focuses on three key questions: (1) How to construct a Composite Ecosystem Service Index (CESI) for island cities? (2) How to identify the Ecosystem Service Networks (ESNs) of island-type cities? (3) How to optimize the ecosystem service networks of island cities? This study selects Pingtan Island as a representative case, innovatively integrating the InVEST and MaxEnt models to conduct a comprehensive assessment of ecological and cultural services. By employing Principal Component Analysis (PCA), a Composite Ecosystem Service Index (CESI) was established. The research follows a systematic technical approach to construct and optimize the ESN: landscape connectivity indices were applied to identify ecological source areas based on CESI outcomes; multidimensional resistance factors were integrated into the Minimum Cumulative Resistance (MCR) model to develop the foundational ecological network; gradient buffer zone analysis and circuit theory were sequentially employed to refine the network structure and evaluate ecological efficacy. Key findings reveal: (1) Landscape connectivity analysis scientifically delineated 20 ecologically valuable source areas; (2) The coupled MCR model and circuit theory established a hierarchical ESN comprising 45 corridors (12 Level-1, 14 Level-2, and 19 Level-3), identifying 5.75 km 2 of ecological pinch points, 7.17 km 2 of ecological barriers, and 84 critical nodes—primarily concentrated in cultivated areas; (3) Buffer zone gradient analysis confirmed 30 m as the optimal corridor width for multi-scale planning; (4) Circuit theory optimization significantly enhanced network current density (1.653→8.224), demonstrating a leapfrog improvement in ecological service efficiency. The proposed “assessment–construction–optimization” integrated methodology establishes an innovative paradigm for deep integration of ecosystem services with urban spatial planning. These findings provide practical spatial guidance for island city planning, supporting corridor design, conservation prioritization, and targeted restoration, thereby enhancing ecosystem service efficiency, biodiversity protection, and resilience against coastal ecosystem fragmentation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinyan Liu & Bowen Jin & Jianwen Dong & Guochang Ding, 2025. "Integrating InVEST and MaxEnt Models for Ecosystem Service Network Optimization in Island Cities: Evidence from Pingtan Island, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-28, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8470-:d:1754484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8470/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8470/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng Wang & Nan Li & Yating He & Youjun He, 2022. "Evaluation of Cultural Ecosystem Service Functions in National Parks from the Perspective of Benefits of Community Residents," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Shifaw, Eshetu & Sha, Jinming & Li, Xiaomei & Bao, Zhongcong & Zhou, Zhenglong, 2019. "An insight into land-cover changes and their impacts on ecosystem services before and after the implementation of a comprehensive experimental zone plan in Pingtan island, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 631-642.
    3. Fedele, Giacomo & Locatelli, Bruno & Djoudi, Houria, 2017. "Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 43-54.
    4. Fish, Robert & Church, Andrew & Winter, Michael, 2016. "Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PB), pages 208-217.
    5. Shuhua Liang & Fan Yang & Jingyi Zhang & Suwen Xiong & Zhenni Xu, 2024. "Assessment and Management Zoning of Ecosystem Service Trade-Off/Synergy Based on the Social–Ecological Balance: A Case of the Chang-Zhu-Tan Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    6. You Zuo & Lin Zhang, 2023. "Research on Local Ecosystem Cultural Services in the Jiangnan Water Network Rural Areas: A Case Study of the Ecological Green Integration Demonstration Zone in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Langemeyer, Johannes & Benra, Felipe & Nahuelhual, Laura & Zoderer, Brenda Maria, 2024. "Ecosystem Services Justice: The Emergence of a Critical Research Field," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Woodhead, A.J. & Kenter, J.O. & Thomas, C.D. & Stringer, L.C., 2025. "How ecosystem services are co-produced: a critical review identifying multiple research framings," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Zhicai Wu & Jianwu Qi & Jialiang Xie & Kai Zhang, 2024. "Towards Sustainability: Cultural-Ecological-Economic Systems Coupling in the Yellow River Basin Based on Service-Dominant Logic," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Busch, Christin & Specht, Kathrin & Inostroza, Luis & Falke, Matthias & Zepp, Harald, 2024. "Disentangling cultural ecosystem services co-production in urban green spaces through social media reviews," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Kenter, Jasper O. & Bryce, Rosalind & Christie, Michael & Cooper, Nigel & Hockley, Neal & Irvine, Katherine N. & Fazey, Ioan & O’Brien, Liz & Orchard-Webb, Johanne & Ravenscroft, Neil & Raymond, Chris, 2016. "Shared values and deliberative valuation: Future directions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PB), pages 358-371.
    6. Tandarić, Neven & Ives, Christopher D. & Watkins, Charles, 2022. "From city in the park to “greenery in plant pots”: The influence of socialist and post-socialist planning on opportunities for cultural ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Orchard-Webb, Johanne & Kenter, Jasper O. & Bryce, Ros & Church, Andrew, 2016. "Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation to implement the Ecosystem Approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PB), pages 308-318.
    8. Locatelli, Bruno & Benra, Felipe & Geneletti, Davide & Loft, Lasse & Loos, Jacqueline & Schröter, Barbara & Winkler, Klara & Zoderer, Brenda Maria, 2025. "Framing the relationship between justice and ecosystem services: A systematic review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Evans, Nicole M. & Carrozzino-Lyon, Amy L. & Galbraith, Betsy & Noordyk, Julia & Peroff, Deidre M. & Stoll, John & Thompson, Aaron & Winden, Matthew W. & Davis, Mark A., 2019. "Integrated ecosystem service assessment for landscape conservation design in the Green Bay watershed, Wisconsin," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    10. Ranger, S. & Kenter, J.O. & Bryce, R. & Cumming, G. & Dapling, T. & Lawes, E. & Richardson, P.B., 2016. "Forming shared values in conservation management: An interpretive-deliberative-democratic approach to including community voices," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PB), pages 344-357.
    11. Lau, Jacqueline D. & Hicks, Christina C. & Gurney, Georgina G. & Cinner, Joshua E., 2018. "Disaggregating ecosystem service values and priorities by wealth, age, and education," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PA), pages 91-98.
    12. Jie Yin & Lili Zhao, 2024. "The Value Expression and Driving Factors of Rural Spatial Ecological Products: A Case Study of B&Bs in Jiangsu and Zhejiang Provinces, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Beichen Ge & Congjin Wang & Yuhong Song, 2023. "Ecosystem Services Research in Rural Areas: A Systematic Review Based on Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Kenter, Jasper O., 2016. "Integrating deliberative monetary valuation, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PB), pages 291-307.
    15. Hattam, Caroline & Broszeit, Stefanie & Langmead, Olivia & Praptiwi, Radisti A. & Ching Lim, Voon & Creencia, Lota A. & Duc Hau, Tran & Maharja, Carya & Wulandari, Prawesti & Mitra Setia, Tatang & Sug, 2021. "A matrix approach to tropical marine ecosystem service assessments in South east Asia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    16. Hoelting, Kristin R. & Martinez, Doreen E. & Bair, Lucas S. & Schuster, Rudy M. & Gavin, Michael C., 2025. "The Benefits Knowledges Learning Framework: a tool for learning across diverse knowledge systems in ecosystem valuation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    17. Cooper, Nigel & Brady, Emily & Steen, Helen & Bryce, Rosalind, 2016. "Aesthetic and spiritual values of ecosystems: Recognising the ontological and axiological plurality of cultural ecosystem ‘services’," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PB), pages 218-229.
    18. Bryce, Rosalind & Irvine, Katherine N. & Church, Andrew & Fish, Robert & Ranger, Sue & Kenter, Jasper O., 2016. "Subjective well-being indicators for large-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PB), pages 258-269.
    19. Durrant, Rachael & Ely, Adrian, 2022. "Deliberative-analytic approaches to Ecosystem Services as a way forward for the land sparing/sharing debate," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    20. Chang You & Hongjiao Qu & Shidong Zhang & Luo Guo, 2024. "Assessment of Uncertainties in Ecological Risk Based on the Prediction of Land Use Change and Ecosystem Service Evolution," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8470-:d:1754484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.