IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p860-d1634417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Scenario Simulation of Land Use Change Along with Ecosystem Service Value for the Lanzhou–Xining Urban Agglomeration

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Bai

    (College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Zhuo Jia

    (College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Yufan Sun

    (College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Chengyi Zheng

    (College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Mingxing Wen

    (College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

Abstract

Research on the characteristics of land use change in urban agglomerations and its influences on ecosystem service value has important theoretical significance and practical value for supporting spatial development and guaranteeing ecological security. Located in the upper reaches of China’s Yellow River, the Lanzhou–Xining urban agglomeration is situated in the mosaic of the transition from the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau to the Loess Plateau. It is a substantial industrial base and economic region of western China. It is also the essence of a relatively concentrated population and dense cities. It is not only a key development area but also an essential ecological barrier in western China, shouldering the important responsibility of ensuring a win-win situation for both economic and social development and ecological and environmental protection. This research takes the Lanzhou–Xining urban agglomeration as a case region, investigates the characteristics of changes in land use and ecosystem service value from 2000 to 2020, and applies the PLUS model to emulate land use changes and ecosystem service value in 2030 in three scenarios: the natural development scenario, cultivated land protection scenario, and ecological conservation scenario. The results indicate that: (1) The land use type of the Lanzhou–Xining urban agglomeration from 2000 to 2020 was dominated by grassland, accounting for 60.32~61.25% of the gross area. The reciprocal transfer between cultivated land and grassland was the most significant, and the expansion of construction land mainly took over cultivated land and grassland, accounting for 58.23% and 34.84%. (2) As a result of ecological rehabilitation projects and the continuous increase of water areas, the ecosystem service value of Lanzhou–Xining urban agglomeration continued to increase between 2000 and 2020, with a cumulative total of 56.84 × 10 8 yuan and a growth rate of 2.67%. Grassland donated the most to the ecosystem service value, constituting 52.56~53.44%. Among the individual ecosystem service values, hydrological regulation and climate regulation contributed the most, and together accounted for 50.86~51.69% of the ecosystem service value. (3) Under the natural development scenario, unrestricted urban sprawl has taken possession of cultivated land and grassland. Under the cultivated land protection scenario, cultivated land has maintained a relatively stable level while construction has been subject to certain constraints. Under the ecological conservation scenario, ecological land has been largely protected and the encroachment of construction onto ecological land has been curbed. (4) Of the three scenarios, only the ecological conservation scenario saw an increase in the ecosystem service values compared to 2020. The reduction in grassland and water area was the main cause for the decrease of the ecosystem service values in the natural development scenario and cultivated land protection scenario. The results can supply a solid foundation for decision-making for future development of the Lanzhou–Xining urban agglomeration and the rational use of land, as well as offer references for the ecological conservation and high-quality development of urban agglomerations in the upper reaches of the Yellow River.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Bai & Zhuo Jia & Yufan Sun & Chengyi Zheng & Mingxing Wen, 2025. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of Land Use Change Along with Ecosystem Service Value for the Lanzhou–Xining Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:860-:d:1634417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/860/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/860/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shifaw, Eshetu & Sha, Jinming & Li, Xiaomei & Bao, Zhongcong & Zhou, Zhenglong, 2019. "An insight into land-cover changes and their impacts on ecosystem services before and after the implementation of a comprehensive experimental zone plan in Pingtan island, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 631-642.
    2. Costanza, Robert & de Groot, Rudolf & Braat, Leon & Kubiszewski, Ida & Fioramonti, Lorenzo & Sutton, Paul & Farber, Steve & Grasso, Monica, 2017. "Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 1-16.
    3. Yuanyuan Lou & Dan Yang & Pengyan Zhang & Ying Zhang & Meiling Song & Yicheng Huang & Wenlong Jing, 2022. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of Land Use Changes with Ecosystem Service Value in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Daowei Zhang & Anne Stenger, 2015. "Value and valuation of forest ecosystem services," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 129-140, July.
    5. Chen, Chengjing & Liu, Yihua, 2021. "Spatiotemporal changes of ecosystem services value by incorporating planning policies: A case of the Pearl River Delta, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 461(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yajing Shao & Xuefeng Yuan & Chaoqun Ma & Ruifang Ma & Zhaoxia Ren, 2020. "Quantifying the Spatial Association between Land Use Change and Ecosystem Services Value: A Case Study in Xi’an, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Lili Zhang & Baoqing Hu & Ze Zhang & Gaodou Liang & Simin Huang, 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological-Economic Value of Guangxi Based on Land Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Henghui Xi & Wanglai Cui & Li Cai & Mengyuan Chen & Chenglei Xu, 2021. "Evaluation and Prediction of Ecosystem Service Value in the Zhoushan Islands Based on LUCC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Liu Yang & Hongzan Jiao, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Changes in Ecosystem Services Value and Its Driving Factors in the Karst Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    6. Jie Chen & Hui Fu & Shengtian Chen, 2023. "Multi-Scenario Simulation and Assessment of Ecosystem Service Value at the City Level from the Perspective of “Production–Living–Ecological” Spaces: A Case Study of Haikou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Hui Yang & Jiansheng Cao & Xianglong Hou, 2023. "Study on the Evaluation and Assessment of Ecosystem Service Spatial Differentiation at Different Scales in Mountainous Areas around the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Xiao Zhang & Jun Wang & Mingyue Zhao & Yan Gao & Yanxu Liu, 2023. "Variations of Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand on the Southeast Hilly Area of China: Implications for Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Chaoxu Luan & Renzhi Liu, 2022. "A Comparative Study of Various Land Use and Land Cover Change Models to Predict Ecosystem Service Value," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Tianhai Zhang & Yaqin Qu & Yang Liu & Guanfeng Yan & Greg Foliente, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Response of Ecosystem Service Values to Land Use Change in Xiamen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Yingying Wu & Xuelu Liu & Qiqi Zhao & Hongyan Liu & Fei Qu & Miaomiao Zhang, 2024. "Impact of Land Use/Land Cover Change on Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs/Synergies—A Case Study of Gangu County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Apan, Armando, 2023. "Examining policy−institution−program (PIP) responses against the drivers of ecosystem dynamics. A chronological review (1960–2020) from Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    13. Qian Zhou & Feng Gui & Benxuan Zhao & Jingyi Liu & Huiwen Cai & Kaida Xu & Sheng Zhao, 2024. "Examining the Social Costs of Carbon Emissions and the Ecosystem Service Value in Island Ecosystems: An Analysis of the Zhoushan Archipelago," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    14. Liu, Duan & Tang, Runcheng & Xie, Jun & Tian, Jingjing & Shi, Rui & Zhang, Kai, 2020. "Valuation of ecosystem services of rice–fish coculture systems in Ruyuan County, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    15. Busch, Christin & Specht, Kathrin & Inostroza, Luis & Falke, Matthias & Zepp, Harald, 2024. "Disentangling cultural ecosystem services co-production in urban green spaces through social media reviews," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    16. Simin He & Yusong Xie & Jing Zhang & Yanyun Luo & Qianna Wang, 2025. "Heterogeneity of Ecosystem Service Interactions Through Scale Effects and Time Effects and Their Social-Ecological Determinants in the Tuo River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, January.
    17. Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, Agata & Olszańska, Agnieszka & Rechciński, Marcin & Tusznio, Joanna & Grodzińska-Jurczak, Małgorzata, 2022. "Divergent or convergent? Prioritization and spatial representation of ecosystem services as perceived by conservation professionals and local leaders," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    18. Wenjie Zhu & Xiaobin Jin & Xiaolin Zhang & Jingping Liu & Yinkang Zhou, 2024. "Ecosystem services to support sustainable development: The modifiable areal unit problem in the transition between evaluation and management units," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 6253-6273, December.
    19. Robbie Maris & Mark Holmes, 2023. "Economic Growth Theory and Natural Resource Constraints: A Stocktake and Critical Assessment," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 56(2), pages 255-268, June.
    20. Shuzhen Song & Xingyan Chen & Yuehua Song & Yongkuan Chi, 2024. "Vegetation Restoration Patterns Influence the Supply and Interrelations of Grassland Ecosystem Services in Karst Desertification Control," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:860-:d:1634417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.