Author
Listed:
- Yuqi Li
(School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
National Engineering Research Center for Forestry and Grassland Landscape Architecture, No. 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Shouhang Zhao
(School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
National Engineering Research Center for Forestry and Grassland Landscape Architecture, No. 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Aibo Jin
(School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
National Engineering Research Center for Forestry and Grassland Landscape Architecture, No. 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China)
- Ziqian Nie
(School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
National Engineering Research Center for Forestry and Grassland Landscape Architecture, No. 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China)
- Yunyuan Li
(School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
National Engineering Research Center for Forestry and Grassland Landscape Architecture, No. 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China)
Abstract
Assessment of cultural ecosystem services (CESs) is a key component in advancing the sustainable development of urban ecosystems. Mapping the spatial distribution of CESs provides spatially explicit insights for urban landscape planning. However, most assessments lack regional adaptability, particularly in cities with pronounced environmental and cultural heterogeneity. To address this gap, this study focused on the central urban area of Lhasa, using communities as units to develop a tailored CES assessment framework. The framework integrated the MaxEnt model with multi-source indicators to analyze the spatial distribution of five CES categories and their relationships with environmental variables. Spatial statistics and classification at community level informed the CES spatial optimization strategies. Results indicated that high-value CES areas were predominantly concentrated in the old city cluster, typified by Barkhor and Jibenggang subdistricts, following an east–west spatial pattern along the Lhasa River. Distance to tourist spot contributed 78.3% to cultural heritage, 86.1% to spirit and religion, and 42.2% to ecotourism and aesthetic services, making it the most influential environmental variable. At the community level, CESs exhibited a distinct spatial gradient, with higher values in the central area and lower values in the eastern and western peripheries. For the ecotourism and aesthetic category, 61.47% of the community area was classified as low service, whereas only 1.48% and 7.33% were identified as excellent and high. Moreover, communities within subdistricts such as Barkhor and Zhaxi demonstrated excellent service across four CES categories, with notably lower performance in the health category. This study presents a quantitative and adaptable framework and planning guidance to support the sustainable development of CESs in cities with similar characteristics.
Suggested Citation
Yuqi Li & Shouhang Zhao & Aibo Jin & Ziqian Nie & Yunyuan Li, 2025.
"Assessment and Spatial Optimization of Cultural Ecosystem Services in the Central Urban Area of Lhasa,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1722-:d:1732334
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1722-:d:1732334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.