IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i9p1722-d1732334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment and Spatial Optimization of Cultural Ecosystem Services in the Central Urban Area of Lhasa

Author

Listed:
  • Yuqi Li

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Forestry and Grassland Landscape Architecture, No. 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Shouhang Zhao

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Forestry and Grassland Landscape Architecture, No. 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Aibo Jin

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Forestry and Grassland Landscape Architecture, No. 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Ziqian Nie

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Forestry and Grassland Landscape Architecture, No. 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Yunyuan Li

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Forestry and Grassland Landscape Architecture, No. 35 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

Assessment of cultural ecosystem services (CESs) is a key component in advancing the sustainable development of urban ecosystems. Mapping the spatial distribution of CESs provides spatially explicit insights for urban landscape planning. However, most assessments lack regional adaptability, particularly in cities with pronounced environmental and cultural heterogeneity. To address this gap, this study focused on the central urban area of Lhasa, using communities as units to develop a tailored CES assessment framework. The framework integrated the MaxEnt model with multi-source indicators to analyze the spatial distribution of five CES categories and their relationships with environmental variables. Spatial statistics and classification at community level informed the CES spatial optimization strategies. Results indicated that high-value CES areas were predominantly concentrated in the old city cluster, typified by Barkhor and Jibenggang subdistricts, following an east–west spatial pattern along the Lhasa River. Distance to tourist spot contributed 78.3% to cultural heritage, 86.1% to spirit and religion, and 42.2% to ecotourism and aesthetic services, making it the most influential environmental variable. At the community level, CESs exhibited a distinct spatial gradient, with higher values in the central area and lower values in the eastern and western peripheries. For the ecotourism and aesthetic category, 61.47% of the community area was classified as low service, whereas only 1.48% and 7.33% were identified as excellent and high. Moreover, communities within subdistricts such as Barkhor and Zhaxi demonstrated excellent service across four CES categories, with notably lower performance in the health category. This study presents a quantitative and adaptable framework and planning guidance to support the sustainable development of CESs in cities with similar characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuqi Li & Shouhang Zhao & Aibo Jin & Ziqian Nie & Yunyuan Li, 2025. "Assessment and Spatial Optimization of Cultural Ecosystem Services in the Central Urban Area of Lhasa," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1722-:d:1732334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1722/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1722/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xin Huang & Cheng Li & Jie Zhao & Shuang Chen & Minghui Gao & Haodong Liu, 2025. "Investigating Spatial Heterogeneity Patterns and Coupling Coordination Effects of the Cultural Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand: A Case Study of Taiyuan City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-34, June.
    2. Kim, Jihwan & Shin, Wonhyeop & Kim, Seunguk & Choe, Hyeyeong & Tanaka, Toshinori & Song, Youngkeun, 2024. "Use of ecosystem services and land ownership to prioritize conservation areas on Jeju Island, Republic of Korea," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    3. Greenland-Smith, Simon & Brazner, John & Sherren, Kate, 2016. "Farmer perceptions of wetlands and waterbodies: Using social metrics as an alternative to ecosystem service valuation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 58-69.
    4. Manley, Kyle & Nyelele, Charity & Egoh, Benis N., 2022. "A review of machine learning and big data applications in addressing ecosystem service research gaps," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    5. Xiaodong Chen & Chengzhao Wu, 2025. "Mapping and Assessing the Supply and Demand of Rural Recreation Services in National Parks: A Case Study of Qianjiangyuan, Zhejiang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Shi, Qinqin & Chen, Hai & Liang, Xiaoying & Liu, Di & Geng, Tianwei & Zhang, Hang, 2025. "Combination of participatory mapping and Maxent model to visualize the cultural ecosystem services at county scale," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    7. Shouhang Zhao & Yuqi Li & Ziqian Nie & Yunyuan Li, 2025. "Supply–Demand Assessment of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Urban Parks of Plateau River Valley City: A Case Study of Lhasa," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-28, June.
    8. Zhang, Hongjuan & Gao, Yan & Hua, Yawei & Zhang, Yue & Liu, Kang, 2019. "Assessing and mapping recreationists’ perceived social values for ecosystem services in the Qinling Mountains, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    9. Aibo Jin & Yunyu Ge & Shiyang Zhang, 2024. "Spatial Characteristics of Multidimensional Urban Vitality and Its Impact Mechanisms by the Built Environment," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, July.
    10. Linru Li & Yu Bai & Xuefeng Yuan & Feiyan Li, 2025. "Assessing the Supply–Demand Matching and Spatial Flow of Urban Cultural Ecosystem Services: Based on Geospatial Data and User Interaction Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, April.
    11. Nuan Han & Roziya Binti Ibrahim & Mohd Sallehuddin Bin Mat Noor, 2025. "Assessing Cultural Ecosystem Services in Sponge City Infrastructure: A Systematic Review and Framework Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Scully-Engelmeyer, Kaegan M. & Granek, Elise F. & Nielsen-Pincus, Max & Brown, Greg, 2021. "Participatory GIS mapping highlights indirect use and existence values of coastal resources and marine conservation areas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    13. Masoomeh Shemshad & Agnieszka Synowiec & Marcin Kopyra & Zsófia Benedek, 2025. "The Community-Driven Ecosystem Resilience and Equity Framework: A Novel Approach for Social Resilience in Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-31, April.
    14. Nie, Xin & Huang, Chengdao & Wang, Han, 2025. "A new method to classify cultural ecosystem services and visualize their economic value: A case study of Guilin, a famous tourist destination in China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    15. You Zuo & Lin Zhang, 2023. "Research on Local Ecosystem Cultural Services in the Jiangnan Water Network Rural Areas: A Case Study of the Ecological Green Integration Demonstration Zone in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shi, Qinqin & Chen, Hai & Liang, Xiaoying & Liu, Di & Geng, Tianwei & Zhang, Hang, 2025. "Combination of participatory mapping and Maxent model to visualize the cultural ecosystem services at county scale," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. Xin Huang & Cheng Li & Jie Zhao & Shuang Chen & Minghui Gao & Haodong Liu, 2025. "Investigating Spatial Heterogeneity Patterns and Coupling Coordination Effects of the Cultural Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand: A Case Study of Taiyuan City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-34, June.
    3. Cong Li & Yajuan Zhou & Manfei Wu & Jiayue Xu & Xin Fu, 2025. "Exploring Nonlinear Threshold Effects and Interactions Between Built Environment and Urban Vitality at the Block Level Using Machine Learning," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, June.
    4. Jie Yin & Lili Zhao, 2024. "The Value Expression and Driving Factors of Rural Spatial Ecological Products: A Case Study of B&Bs in Jiangsu and Zhejiang Provinces, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Polas, Md. Abul Bashar & Ahammad, Ronju & Topp, Emmeline & Plieninger, Tobias, 2025. "Participatory mapping of degradation and restoration processes in the Sundarbans mangrove ecosystem," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Wensheng Yu & Lijie Wei & Zhenxing Jin & Yuzhen Lin & Chengxin Wang, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Variations and Driving Forces of Ecosystem Service Value: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Hassan, Suziana & Olsen, Søren Bøye & Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark, 2019. "Urban-rural divides in preferences for wetland conservation in Malaysia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 226-237.
    8. Xiaodong Chen & Chengzhao Wu, 2025. "Mapping and Assessing the Supply and Demand of Rural Recreation Services in National Parks: A Case Study of Qianjiangyuan, Zhejiang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Yasin Yaman & Seda Örücü, 2025. "Spatial Distribution of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Rural Landscapes Using PGIS and SolVES," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Binglu Wu & Wenzhuo Liang & Jiening Wang & Dongxu Cui, 2022. "Rural Residents’ Perceptions of Ecosystem Services: A Study from Three Topographic Areas in Shandong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Yang Gao & Zhen Shen & Yuexin Liu & Chaoyue Yu & Lihan Cui & Cuiling Song, 2023. "Optimization of differentiated regional land development patterns based on urban expansion simulation—A case in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 45-73, March.
    12. Deng, Guangyi & Jiang, Haibo & Ma, Shuai & Wen, Yang & He, Chunguang & Sheng, Lianxi & Gu, Dehai, 2025. "How water–energy–food services and their interactions change along multiple environmental gradients," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    13. Siciliano, Giuseppina & Urban, Frauke, 2017. "Equity-based Natural Resource Allocation for Infrastructure Development: Evidence From Large Hydropower Dams in Africa and Asia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 130-139.
    14. Stelian Dimitrov & Bilyana Borisova & Antoaneta Ivanova & Martin Iliev & Lidiya Semerdzhieva & Maya Ruseva & Zoya Stoyanova, 2025. "Digital Geospatial Twinning for Revaluation of a Waterfront Urban Park Design (Case Study: Burgas City, Bulgaria)," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-28, August.
    15. Xiaoping Zhang & Xiaoyu Gan & Ying Huang & Zhuoting Jiang, 2024. "The Renewal of Lost Space under Overpasses in Chengdu City Based on Residents’ Requirements for Cultural Services: The Case of the Longtan Overpass," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, September.
    16. Yuchen Xie & Jiaxin Zhang & Yunqin Li & Zehong Zhu & Junye Deng & Zhixiu Li, 2024. "Integrating Multi-Source Urban Data with Interpretable Machine Learning for Uncovering the Multidimensional Drivers of Urban Vitality," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, November.
    17. Kaili Zhang & Tan Liu & Rongrong Feng & Zhicheng Zhang & Kang Liu, 2021. "Coupling Coordination Relationship and Driving Mechanism between Urbanization and Ecosystem Service Value in Large Regions: A Case Study of Urban Agglomeration in Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-26, July.
    18. Behnoosh Abbasnezhad & Jesse B. Abrams & Jeffrey Hepinstall-Cymerman, 2023. "Incorporating Social and Policy Drivers into Land-Use and Land-Cover Projection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Jinyan Liu & Bowen Jin & Jianwen Dong & Guochang Ding, 2025. "Integrating InVEST and MaxEnt Models for Ecosystem Service Network Optimization in Island Cities: Evidence from Pingtan Island, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-28, September.
    20. Zhicheng Zhang & Hongjuan Zhang & Juan Feng & Yirong Wang & Kang Liu, 2021. "Evaluation of Social Values for Ecosystem Services in Urban Riverfront Space Based on the SolVES Model: A Case Study of the Fenghe River, Xi’an, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-26, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1722-:d:1732334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.