IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8415-d1753315.html

Perceived ESG and Competitive Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model of Green Technology Innovation and Digital Transformation in Chinese Manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Jingdi Fan

    (International College, National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok 10240, Thailand)

  • Vesarach Aumeboonsuke

    (International College, National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok 10240, Thailand)

Abstract

This study investigates how perceived ESG influences competitive performance through green technology innovation, with a focus on the moderating role of digital transformation. Grounded in social exchange theory and extending stakeholder exchange orchestration mechanisms, the research proposes that ESG initiatives foster reciprocal stakeholder relationships that drive innovation and performance through specific temporal and cultural exchange processes. Using survey data from 453 Chinese green manufacturing enterprises, we applied structural equation modeling to test the theoretical framework. Findings show that all perceived ESG dimensions, environmental, social, and governance significantly enhance both green technology innovation and competitive performance. Green technology innovation serves as a key mediator, illustrating how sustainability initiatives create competitive advantages through innovation mechanisms. Digital transformation amplifies these effects across all perceived ESG dimensions. This research contributes to sustainability literature by introducing stakeholder exchange orchestration theory, validating perception-based ESG measurements in emerging market contexts, and demonstrating digitally enhanced social exchange mechanisms. For practitioners, the study provides resource-constrained implementation strategies and innovation-focused approaches essential to maximize sustainable competitive performance outcomes. The results offer empirically grounded insights into how sustainability practices can drive innovation-based competitive advantages in emerging economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingdi Fan & Vesarach Aumeboonsuke, 2025. "Perceived ESG and Competitive Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model of Green Technology Innovation and Digital Transformation in Chinese Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-28, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8415-:d:1753315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8415/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8415/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sayema Sultana & Norhayah Zulkifli & Dalilawati Zainal, 2018. "Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) and Investment Decision in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Saumyaranjan Sahoo & Anil Kumar & Arvind Upadhyay, 2023. "How do green knowledge management and green technology innovation impact corporate environmental performance? Understanding the role of green knowledge acquisition," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 551-569, January.
    3. Lai, Kee-hung & Feng, Yunting & Zhu, Qinghua, 2023. "Digital transformation for green supply chain innovation in manufacturing operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Hee-Woong Kim & Atreyi Kankanhalli & So-Hyun Lee, 2018. "Examining Gifting Through Social Network Services: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 805-828, December.
    5. Lee, Michael T. & Raschke, Robyn L. & Krishen, Anjala S., 2022. "Signaling green! firm ESG signals in an interconnected environment that promote brand valuation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-11.
    6. Lishi Zeng & Xuemei Jiang, 2023. "ESG and Corporate Performance: Evidence from Agriculture and Forestry Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Juan Hu & Chengjin Ma & Chen Li, 2022. "Can Green Innovation Improve Regional Environmental Carrying Capacity? An Empirical Analysis from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Li, Guangpei & Wang, Xiaoyu & Su, Shibin & Su, Yuan, 2019. "How green technological innovation ability influences enterprise competitiveness," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    9. Pies, Ingo & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2024. "Trade-offs in stakeholder theory: An ordonomic perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(5), pages 975-997.
    10. Krishna Raj Bhandari & Mikko Ranta & Jari Salo, 2022. "The resource‐based view, stakeholder capitalism, ESG, and sustainable competitive advantage: The firm's embeddedness into ecology, society, and governance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1525-1537, May.
    11. Shan Wu & Ying Li, 2023. "A Study on the Impact of Digital Transformation on Corporate ESG Performance: The Mediating Role of Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Wanyi Chen & Hao Ren & Yanyu Shu, 2025. "The Impact of Corporate Digital Transformation on Sustainable Development in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 2721-2747, March.
    13. Qihang Xi & Zhiyuan Li & Jia Zhao & Jiaqi Ding, 2025. "How Can Technology Orientation Promote Green Process Innovation? The Mediating Effect of Digital Capability and the Moderating Role of Innovation-Oriented Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-24, April.
    14. Xin Yi & Arifa Tanveer & Lee Bin & Yan Xue, 2024. "Unleashing the Influence of Information Sharing, Technological Openness, and Corporate Innovation on Green Corporate Social Responsibility: A Way Toward Environmental Sustainability," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(1), pages 395-417, February.
    15. Khalid H. Alshammari & Abdulhamid F. Alshammari, 2023. "Green Innovation and Its Effects on Innovation Climate and Environmental Sustainability: The Moderating Influence of Green Abilities and Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Jihye Yun & Jonghwa Lee, 2022. "Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate CSR Investment and Business Performance Using ESG Index—The Use-Case of Korean Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Yuan, Baolong & Cao, Xueyun, 2022. "Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    18. Nirino, Niccolò & Santoro, Gabriele & Miglietta, Nicola & Quaglia, Roberto, 2021. "Corporate controversies and company's financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    19. Guangyou Zhou & Lian Liu & Sumei Luo, 2022. "Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3371-3387, November.
    20. Xiaoyang Xu & Muhammad Imran & Muhammad Ayaz & Sonia Lohana, 2022. "The Mediating Role of Green Technology Innovation with Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Financial, and Environmental Performance: The Case of Chinese Manufacturing Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    21. Yixuan Chen & Shanyue Jin, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Green Technology Innovation: The Moderating Role of Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    22. Chen Xu & Yu He, 2025. "The Impact of ESG Performance on Green Technology Innovation: A Moderating Effect Based on Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-22, April.
    23. Slimane Ed‐Dafali & Zahra Adardour & Atar Derj & Adil Bami & Khaled Hussainey, 2025. "A PRISMA‐Based Systematic Review on Economic, Social, and Governance Practices: Insights and Research Agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 1896-1916, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie, Mohamed & Qi, Baolei & Elgammal, Mohammed & Elnahass, Marwa, 2024. "A more sustainable future: Can politically connected CEOs spur the nexus between ESG performance and firm financial performance?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    2. Quayson, Matthew & Bai, Chunguang & Mahmoudi, Amin & Hu, Weihao & Chen, Wei & Omoruyi, Osayuwamen, 2023. "Designing a decision support tool for integrating ESG into the natural resource extraction industry for sustainable development using the ordinal priority approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    3. Yuemei Ding & Dequan Zheng & Xiaoyu Niu, 2023. "Collaborative Green Innovation of Livestock Product Three-Level Supply Chain Traceability System: A Value Co-Creation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-28, December.
    4. Jian Yin & Jian Xu, 2025. "Exploring the Impact of Board Size on ESG Controversies: New Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Wang, Shaofeng & Zhang, Hao, 2024. "Green entrepreneurship success in the age of generative artificial intelligence: The interplay of technology adoption, knowledge management, and government support," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Jia, Haifeng & Huang, Xinyi & Gong, Yuechen & Liu, Youping & Jiang, Hui, 2025. "Can climate risk disclosure improve corporate green innovation?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    7. Dongheng Han & Zhihui Li & Xun Cui & Lin Liang, 2025. "How Can We Improve the ESG Performance of Manufacturing Enterprises?—The Carbon Resilience Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Saleh Mohammed Mashehdul Islam, 2025. "Exploring How Corporate Maturity Moderates the Value Relevance of ESG Disclosures in Sustainable Reporting: Evidence from Bangladesh’s Developing Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Esther Agyeiwaa Owusu & Lulin Zhou & Agyemang Kwasi Sampene & Francis Atta Sarpong & Francisca Arboh, 2024. "Fostering Environmental Performance Via Corporate Social Responsibility and Green Innovation Initiatives: Examining the Moderating Influence of Competitive Advantage," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, April.
    10. Yang Liu & Sameer Kumar & Huiqing Liu & Shun Li & Ziyun Zhou, 2025. "ESG performance, digital transformation, and green innovation," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Cai, Cen & Li, Yijia & Tu, Yongqian, 2024. "Big data capabilities, ESG performance and corporate value," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    12. Ma, Jinghao & Shang, Yujie & Liu, Liming, 2025. "Green image, digital transformation, and corporate green innovation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    13. Sam Solaimani, 2024. "From Compliance to Capability: On the Role of Data and Technology in Environment, Social, and Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.
    14. Rachana Manoj Lunawat & Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Doaa Shohaieb, 2025. "Integrating Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Factors into the Investment Returns of American Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Shenshen Zhang, 2024. "The impact of digital transformation on ESG performance and the moderation of mixed‐ownership reform: The evidence from Chinese state‐owned enterprises," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 2195-2210, May.
    16. Qiao, Penghua & Liu, Siting & Fung, Hung-Gay & Wang, Chen, 2024. "Corporate green innovation in a digital economy," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 870-883.
    17. Rahman, Mahabubur & Rodríguez-Serrano, M. Ángeles & Hossain, Md. Tareq Bin, 2025. "When corporate environmentalism backfires: unpacking the double-edged effect of environmental product innovation on firm growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    18. Karim Mahran & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2026. "Navigating the Corporate Ego: Understanding the Association Between ESG Performance and Organizational Narcissistic Rhetoric," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 204(2), pages 437-456, March.
    19. Bao, Junsong & Yang, Liuyi, 2025. "Will ESG disclosure affect the green innovation level of SMEs?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    20. Anzhu Xue & Guang Yang & Hui Wang, 2025. "The Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) on the Green Development of Listed Companies in China’s Agricultural and Forestry Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8415-:d:1753315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.