IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8313-d1750854.html

Aspects of Support and Types of Work–Life Balance Among Employees from Rural Areas in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Domagalska-Grędys

    (Department of Management and Economics Enterprises, Agriculture University in Krakow, 31-120 Krakow, Poland)

  • Michał Niewiadomski

    (Podhale Center for Economic Sciences, University of Applied Sciences in Nowy Targ, 34-400 Nowy Targ, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Piecuch

    (Doctoral School of Agriculture University in Krakow, Agriculture University in Krakow, 31-120 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

Rural areas offer unique contexts for work–life balance (WLB) development due to distinct working conditions and employment structures. Employees who have access to flexible work arrangements, non-material bonuses, and peaceful workplaces are more productive (lower absenteeism, greater commitment). The aim of the study was to determine the aspects of support and types of WLB among employees from rural areas. Two analyses were conducted: PCA (principal component analysis) for the entire sample, and a fuzzy c-means cluster analysis for wage employees. Based on PCA, three aspects of WLB support were identified: leave, work, and work hygiene (regeneration). The use of emergency and family leave dominated practices supporting WLB among employees in rural areas. The respondents did not attach much importance to social benefits improving work hygiene; moreover, the work hygiene aspect was not applied in parallel with other aspects of WLB support (leave, work). As a result of clustering the respondents’ answers, four employee types were identified based on WLB assessment, demographic characteristics, and work-related factors. Clustering revealed a clear correlation between WLB assessment and employee age and gender. The highest scores in terms of the quality of work–life balance were recorded among middle-aged men (type 4). Younger people, especially women (type 1), rated their WLB as moderately good. Regardless of age and gender, as stress levels increased and personal quality of life declined, thoughts about changing jobs intensified. Employee well-being significantly influences job retention intentions among rural workers. This study uniquely integrates multiple theoretical frameworks and employs principal component analysis and fuzzy c-means clustering to explore work–life balance among rural employees, a group seldom studied. By focusing on rural contexts and offering systemic, multi-domain insights, the findings advance WLB theory and practice and provide recommendations for employers and policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Domagalska-Grędys & Michał Niewiadomski & Katarzyna Piecuch, 2025. "Aspects of Support and Types of Work–Life Balance Among Employees from Rural Areas in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8313-:d:1750854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8313/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8313/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annalisa Dordoni, 2025. "Gender Inequalities and Precarious Work–Life Balance in Italian Academia: Emergency Remote Work and Organizational Change During the COVID-19 Lockdown," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Michał Niewiadomski & Agata Niemczyk & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Marcin Surówka, 2024. "The Elusive Phenomenon: Unveiling Deconsumption in the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Robyn Feiss & Melissa M. Pangelinan, 2021. "Relationships between Physical and Mental Health in Adolescents from Low-Income, Rural Communities: Univariate and Multivariate Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    4. M. Isabel Sánchez-Hernández & Óscar Rodrigo González-López & María Buenadicha-Mateos & Juan Luis Tato-Jiménez, 2019. "Work-Life Balance in Great Companies and Pending Issues for Engaging New Generations at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Wang-Jin Yoo & Inha Oh, 2017. "Effect of Work-Family Balance Policy on Job Selection and Social Sustainability: The Case of South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Giorgio Gosetti, 2017. "Sustainable Agriculture and Quality of Working Life: Analytical Perspectives and Confirmation from Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-23, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuelin Chen & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Abdullah Al Mamun & Jingzu Gao & Zafir Khan Mohamed Makhbul, 2023. "Modeling the significance of work culture on burnout, satisfaction, and psychological distress among the Gen-Z workforce in an emerging country," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Wiza MUNYEKA & Ashika MAHARAJ, 2023. "All’s (or Not) Fair in Work and Life? Focus on Females in Information and Communications Technology Through the Prism of Work-Life Balance," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 4(8), pages 48-63, August.
    3. Haruna M. Moda & Christopher Nwadike & Mela Danjin & Francis Fatoye & Chidozie E. Mbada & Louise Smail & Pauline J. S. Doka, 2021. "Quality of Work Life (QoWL) and Perceived Workplace Commitment among Seasonal Farmers in Nigeria," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, January.
    4. Marina Vladimirovna Muravyova, 2018. "Socio-Economic and Demographic Motivators of the Life Quality of Rural Population in the Russian Federation," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 211-214:3.
    5. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:6494-6501 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Andrea Caputo & Monica Molino & Barbara Cerato & Claudio G. Cortese, 2023. "Employer Attractiveness: Two Instruments to Measure Employer Branding and Reputation," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    7. Nurul Asyilah binti Che Noordin & Sharifah Fazirah Syed Ahmad & Murni Zarina Mohamed Razali & Mohamad Fahimi Ahmad & Hairunnisa Ma’amor, 2023. "Occupational Stress and Work-Life Balance in the Manufacturing Industry," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(3), pages 59-69.
    8. Kuk-Kyoung Moon & Jaeyoung Lim & Jeong-Seo Kim, 2024. "Examining the Effect of Organizational Justice on Turnover Intention and the Moderating Role of Generational Differences: Evidence from Korean Public Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Hazel Mubango & Muchowe Regis M & Mangwende Silas, 2025. "The Relationship Between Flexible Work Arrangements and Employee Performance in a Selected Zimbabwean University: The Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Support," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(14), pages 1913-1927, August.
    10. Patricia Jolliffe & Scott Foster, 2022. "Different Reality? Generations’ and Religious Groups’ Views of Spirituality Policies in the Workplace," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(2), pages 451-470, November.
    11. Young-Jae Kim & E-Sack Kim, 2020. "Relationship between Phobic Anxiety in Work and Leisure Activity Situations, and Optimistic Bias Associated with COVID-19 among South Koreans," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-12, November.
    12. Kapo Wong & Alan H. S. Chan & Pei-Lee Teh, 2020. "How Is Work–Life Balance Arrangement Associated with Organisational Performance? A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Ahmad Bathaei & Dalia Štreimikienė, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Agricultural Sustainability Indicators," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    14. Young-Jae Kim & Jeong-Hyung Cho & E-Sack Kim, 2020. "Differences in Sense of Belonging, Pride, and Mental Health in the Daegu Metropolitan Region due to COVID-19: Comparison between the Presence and Absence of National Disaster Relief Fund," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-11, July.
    15. Yuqing Geng & Xinying Jiang & Yan Yan & Juan Gao & Jianyi Li, 2024. "Toward sustainability: mechanism between work–family balance and fertility intention with decent work as the mediating role," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Agnieszka Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska & Anna Kłoczko-Gajewska & Piotr Sulewski, 2019. "Between the Social and Economic Dimensions of Sustainability in Rural Areas—In Search of Farmers’ Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    17. Nur Idayu Badrolhisam & Rossilah Jamil, 2025. "Gender flexible work arrangements: a global bibliometric analysis with a focus on Asian content," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-29, December.
    18. Judith Janker, 2020. "Moral conflicts, premises and the social dimension of agricultural sustainability," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(1), pages 97-111, March.
    19. Vanja Pavluković & Adam B. Carmer & Miroslav D. Vujičić & Marija Cimbaljević & Uglješa Stankov, 2023. "Unveiling the Motivational Factors behind Generation Z’s Conference Attendance for Sustaining Future Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    20. Ana Gálvez & Francisco Tirado & M. Jesús Martínez, 2020. "Work–Life Balance, Organizations and Social Sustainability: Analyzing Female Telework in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, April.
    21. Sandra Volken & Patrick Bottazzi, 2024. "Sustainable farm work in agroecology: how do systemic factors matter?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(3), pages 1037-1052, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8313-:d:1750854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.