Author
Listed:
- Jingmin Pan
(Department of Emergency Technology, Zhejiang College of Security Technology, Wenzhou 325016, China
School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)
- Aoyang Li
(School of Resources and Planning, Guangzhou Xinhua University, Guangzhou 510520, China)
- Bo Tang
(School of Resources and Planning, Guangzhou Xinhua University, Guangzhou 510520, China)
- Fei Wang
(School of Resources and Planning, Guangzhou Xinhua University, Guangzhou 510520, China)
- Chao Chen
(College of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)
- Wangyu Wu
(School of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK)
- Bingcai Wei
(School of Computer Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)
Abstract
With the impact of fossil energy on the climate environment and the development of energy technologies, new energy vehicles, represented by electric cars, have begun to receive increasing attention and emphasis. The rapid proliferation of public charging infrastructure for NEVs has concurrently influenced traditional petrol station networks, creating measurable disparities in their spatial distributions that warrant systematic investigation. This research examines Wenzhou City, China, as a representative case area, employing multi-source Point of Interest (POI) data and spatial analysis models to analyse differential characteristics in spatial layout accessibility, service equity, and underlying driving mechanisms between public electric vehicle charging stations (EV) and traditional gas stations (GS). The findings reveal that public electric vehicle charging stations exhibit a pronounced “single-centre concentration with weak multi-centre linkage” spatial configuration, heavily reliant on dual-core drivers of population density and economic activity. This results in marked service accessibility declines in peripheral areas, resembling a cliff-like drop, and a relatively low spatial equity index. In contrast, traditional gas stations demonstrate a “core-axis linkage” diffusion pattern with strong coupling to urban road networks, showing gradient attenuation in service coverage efficiency along transportation arteries, fewer suburban service gaps, and more gradual accessibility reductions. Location entropy analysis further indicates that charging station deployment shows significant capital-oriented tendencies, with certain areas exhibiting paradoxical “excess facilities” phenomena, while gas station distribution aligns more closely with road network topology and transportation demand dynamics. Furthermore, the layout characteristics of public charging stations feature a more complex and diverse range of land use types, while traditional gas stations have a strong dependence on industrial land. This research elucidates the spatial distribution patterns of emerging and legacy energy infrastructure in the survey regions, providing critical empirical evidence for optimising energy infrastructure allocation and facilitating coordinated transportation system transitions. The findings also offer practical insights for the construction of energy supply facilities in urban development frameworks, holding substantial reference value for achieving sustainable urban spatial governance.
Suggested Citation
Jingmin Pan & Aoyang Li & Bo Tang & Fei Wang & Chao Chen & Wangyu Wu & Bingcai Wei, 2025.
"Comparative Analysis of Spatial Distribution and Mechanism Differences Between Public Electric Vehicle Charging Stations and Traditional Gas Stations: A Case Study from Wenzhou, China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-30, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:8009-:d:1743024
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:8009-:d:1743024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.