IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i24p9396-d1001037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Stage Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Siting Electric Vehicle Charging Stations within and across Border Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Oluwasola O. Ademulegun

    (Centre for Sustainable Technologies (CST), Ulster University, 2-24 York Street, Belfast BT15 1AP, Northern Ireland, UK)

  • Paul MacArtain

    (Dundalk Institute of Technology (DkIT), Dublin Road, Marshes Upper, A91 K584 Dundalk, Ireland)

  • Bukola Oni

    (Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering (CCEE) Department, Iowa State University, 394 Town Engineering, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

  • Neil J. Hewitt

    (Centre for Sustainable Technologies (CST), Ulster University, 2-24 York Street, Belfast BT15 1AP, Northern Ireland, UK)

Abstract

Electric Vehicles (EVs) replace fossil fuel vehicles in effort towards having more sustainable transport systems. The battery of an EV is recharged at a charging point using electricity. While some recharging will be required at locations where vehicles are normally parked, other recharging could be necessary at strategic locations of vehicular travel. Certain locations are suitable for EV charging station deployment, others are not. A multi-stage decision analysis methodology for selecting suitable locations for installing EV charging station is presented. The multi-stage approach makes it possible to select critical criteria with respect to any defined objectives of the EV charging station and techno-physio-socio-economic factors without which the EV charging station could not be deployed or would not serve its designated purpose. In a case, the type of charging station is specified, and a purpose is defined: rapid EV charging stations intended for public use within and across border regions. Applied in siting real EV charging stations at optimal locations, stages in the methodology present additional techno-physio-socio-economic factors in deploying the type of EV charging stations at optimal locations and keep the EV charging stations operating within acceptable standards. Some locations were dropped at the critical analysis stage; others were dropped at the site-specific analysis stage and replacement sites were required in certain instances. Final locations included most optimal, less optimal, least optimal, and strategic or special need locations. The average distances between contiguous recharging locations were less than 60 miles. Using any specified separation standard, the number of additional EV charging stations required between EV charging stations were determinable with the Pool Box. The Overall Charging Station Availability quadrants suggest that the overall user experience could get worse as less-standardized additional EV charging stations are deployed.

Suggested Citation

  • Oluwasola O. Ademulegun & Paul MacArtain & Bukola Oni & Neil J. Hewitt, 2022. "Multi-Stage Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Siting Electric Vehicle Charging Stations within and across Border Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-28, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:24:p:9396-:d:1001037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/24/9396/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/24/9396/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guo, Sen & Zhao, Huiru, 2015. "Optimal site selection of electric vehicle charging station by using fuzzy TOPSIS based on sustainability perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 390-402.
    2. Al Garni, Hassan Z. & Awasthi, Anjali, 2017. "Solar PV power plant site selection using a GIS-AHP based approach with application in Saudi Arabia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1225-1240.
    3. Leonidas Anthopoulos & Polytimi Kolovou, 2021. "A Multi-Criteria Decision Process for EV Charging Stations’ Deployment: Findings from Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Emilia M. Szumska & Rafał S. Jurecki, 2021. "Parameters Influencing on Electric Vehicle Range," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    5. Ali Akbar Jamali & Reza Ghorbani Kalkhajeh, 2020. "Spatial Modeling Considering valley’s Shape and Rural Satisfaction in Check Dams Site Selection and Water Harvesting in the Watershed," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(10), pages 3331-3344, August.
    6. Jiwon Lee & Midam An & Yongku Kim & Jung-In Seo, 2021. "Optimal Allocation for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-10, September.
    7. Miguel Campaña & Esteban Inga & Jorge Cárdenas, 2021. "Optimal Sizing of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Considering Urban Traffic Flow for Smart Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Mostafa Mahdy & AbuBakr S. Bahaj & Philip Turner & Naomi Wise & Abdulsalam S. Alghamdi & Hidab Hamwi, 2022. "Multi Criteria Decision Analysis to Optimise Siting of Electric Vehicle Charging Points—Case Study Winchester District, UK," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Pokpong Prakobkaew & Somporn Sirisumrannukul, 2022. "Practical Grid-Based Spatial Estimation of Number of Electric Vehicles and Public Chargers for Country-Level Planning with Utilization of GIS Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    10. Di Xu & Wenhui Pei & Qi Zhang, 2022. "Optimal Planning of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Considering User Satisfaction and Charging Convenience," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Byungki Kim & Jae-Bum Park & Dae-Jin Kim, 2021. "A Study on the Power Line Operation Strategy by the Energy Storage System to Ensure Hosting Capacity of Distribution Feeder with Electrical Vehicle Charging Infrastructure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Antonio Nesticò & Piera Somma, 2019. "Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Methods for the Enhancement of Historical Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.
    13. Erbaş, Mehmet & Kabak, Mehmet & Özceylan, Eren & Çetinkaya, Cihan, 2018. "Optimal siting of electric vehicle charging stations: A GIS-based fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1017-1031.
    14. Danny García Sánchez & Alejandra Tabares & Lucas Teles Faria & Juan Carlos Rivera & John Fredy Franco, 2022. "A Clustering Approach for the Optimal Siting of Recharging Stations in the Electric Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Rohan Verma & Santosh Kumar Sharma & Pushpendra Singh & Javed Khan Bhutto & Abdul Rahman Abdullah Alharbi, 2022. "Analysis and Sizing of Charging Stations in Kota City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Panagiotis Skaloumpakas & Evangelos Spiliotis & Elissaios Sarmas & Alexios Lekidis & George Stravodimos & Dimitris Sarigiannis & Ioanna Makarouni & Vangelis Marinakis & John Psarras, 2022. "A Multi-Criteria Approach for Optimizing the Placement of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations in Highways," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Michel Noussan & Matteo Jarre, 2021. "Assessing Commuting Energy and Emissions Savings through Remote Working and Carpooling: Lessons from an Italian Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Danijela Tuljak-Suban & Patricija Bajec, 2022. "A Hybrid DEA Approach for the Upgrade of an Existing Bike-Sharing System with Electric Bikes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Ömer Kaya & Kadir Diler Alemdar & Tiziana Campisi & Ahmet Tortum & Merve Kayaci Çodur, 2021. "The Development of Decarbonisation Strategies: A Three-Step Methodology for the Suitable Analysis of Current EVCS Locations Applied to Istanbul, Turkey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Jane Rose Atwongyeire & Arkom Palamanit & Adul Bennui & Mohammad Shakeri & Kuaanan Techato & Shahid Ali, 2022. "Assessment of Suitable Areas for Smart Grid of Power Generated from Renewable Energy Resources in Western Uganda," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-31, February.
    6. Emilia M. Szumska, 2023. "Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure along Highways in the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Andrea Mazza & Angela Russo & Gianfranco Chicco & Andrea Di Martino & Cristian Giovanni Colombo & Michela Longo & Paolo Ciliento & Marco De Donno & Francesca Mapelli & Francesco Lamberti, 2024. "Categorization of Attributes and Features for the Location of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-32, August.
    8. Philip Mayer & Christopher Stephen Ball & Stefan Vögele & Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs & Dirk Rübbelke, 2019. "Analyzing Brexit: Implications for the Electricity System of Great Britain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-27, August.
    9. Mikołaj Schmidt & Paweł Zmuda-Trzebiatowski & Marcin Kiciński & Piotr Sawicki & Konrad Lasak, 2021. "Multiple-Criteria-Based Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Design Problem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-34, May.
    10. Hui Zhao & Jing Gao & Xian Cheng, 2023. "Electric Vehicle Solar Charging Station Siting Study Based on GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making: A Case Study of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Zhang, Lihui & Zhao, Zhenli & Yang, Meng & Li, Songrui, 2020. "A multi-criteria decision method for performance evaluation of public charging service quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Shorabeh, Saman Nadizadeh & Firozjaei, Hamzeh Karimi & Firozjaei, Mohammad Karimi & Jelokhani-Niaraki, Mohammadreza & Homaee, Mehdi & Nematollahi, Omid, 2022. "The site selection of wind energy power plant using GIS-multi-criteria evaluation from economic perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    13. Manzolli, Jônatas Augusto & Trovão, João Pedro F. & Henggeler Antunes, Carlos, 2022. "Electric bus coordinated charging strategy considering V2G and battery degradation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    14. Betul Yagmahan & Hilal Yılmaz, 2023. "An integrated ranking approach based on group multi-criteria decision making and sensitivity analysis to evaluate charging stations under sustainability," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 96-121, January.
    15. Mansur Arief & Yan Akhra & Iwan Vanany, 2023. "A Robust and Efficient Optimization Model for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations in Developing Countries under Electricity Uncertainty," Papers 2307.05470, arXiv.org.
    16. Ana Pavlićević & Saša Mujović, 2022. "Impact of Reactive Power from Public Electric Vehicle Stations on Transformer Aging and Active Energy Losses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    17. Ajit Kumar Mohanty & Perli Suresh Babu & Surender Reddy Salkuti, 2022. "Optimal Allocation of Fast Charging Station for Integrated Electric-Transportation System Using Multi-Objective Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    18. Sikder, Sujit Kumar & Nagarajan, Magesh & Mustafee, Navonil, 2023. "Augmenting EV charging infrastructure towards transformative sustainable cities: An equity-based approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    19. Qingyou Yan & Hua Dong & Meijuan Zhang, 2021. "Service Evaluation of Electric Vehicle Charging Station: An Application of Improved Matter-Element Extension Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.
    20. Khaled Yousef Almansi & Abdul Rashid Mohamed Shariff & Bahareh Kalantar & Ahmad Fikri Abdullah & Sharifah Norkhadijah Syed Ismail & Naonori Ueda, 2022. "Performance Evaluation of Hospital Site Suitability Using Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Models in Malacca, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-36, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:24:p:9396-:d:1001037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.