IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7837-d1738562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management-Oriented Assessment of Transport Service Quality Using Logistics Monitoring System and Harrington’s Desirability Function in Support of SDG 9

Author

Listed:
  • Victor Aulin

    (Faculty of Construction, Transport and Energy, Central Ukrainian National Technical University, 25006 Kropyvnytskyi, Ukraine)

  • Oleh Liashuk

    (Faculty of Engineering of Machines, Structures and Technologies, Ternopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University, 46001 Ternopil, Ukraine)

  • Dmytro Mironov

    (Faculty of Engineering of Machines, Structures and Technologies, Ternopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University, 46001 Ternopil, Ukraine)

  • Piotr Staliński

    (Faculty of Social Sciences and Computer Sciences, School of Business, National-Louis University w Nowym Sączu, 33-300 Nowy Sącz, Poland)

  • Marek Rutkowski

    (Faculty of Administration and Social Sciences, University of Economics and Innovation in Lublin, 20-209 Lublin, Poland)

  • Sergiy Lysenko

    (Faculty of Construction, Transport and Energy, Central Ukrainian National Technical University, 25006 Kropyvnytskyi, Ukraine)

Abstract

The quality of transport services is not only a measure of operational efficiency but also an important factor of strategic logistics management in the pursuit of sustainable development. This study identifies five key transport service quality indicators (timeliness, routing, economy, safety, efficiency) and uses data from a logistics monitoring system to assess them with Harrington’s desirability function. Each indicator’s performance is converted into a partial desirability score and these scores are combined into a single overall desirability score (D), with weights determined from the data. Notably, a threshold around D = 0.63 emerged as the benchmark for acceptable service quality. This numeric threshold provides managers with a clear KPI target—if the service quality index falls below 0.63, it signals the need for corrective action, whereas consistently achieving values near 0.8 reflects very good performance aligned with strategic sustainability goals. Based on the proposed approach, an algorithm and software tool were developed to automate the assessment process. The obtained results show how improvements in service reliability, safety and efficiency can be aligned with broader sustainability goals in automotive transportation. The proposed approach offers managerial decision makers a robust tool to guide policy and investment, ensuring that enhancements in transport service performance also advance environmental and social sustainability. In doing so, the framework advances SDG 9 by turning logistics telemetry into an actionable management index that strengthens resilient transport infrastructure and fosters practical innovation at the enterprise level.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor Aulin & Oleh Liashuk & Dmytro Mironov & Piotr Staliński & Marek Rutkowski & Sergiy Lysenko, 2025. "Management-Oriented Assessment of Transport Service Quality Using Logistics Monitoring System and Harrington’s Desirability Function in Support of SDG 9," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-27, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7837-:d:1738562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7837/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7837/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Igor Kabashkin, 2023. "Model of Multi Criteria Decision-Making for Selection of Transportation Alternatives on the Base of Transport Needs Hierarchy Framework and Application of Petri Net," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-26, August.
    2. Asmaa M. Hagag & Laila S. Yousef & Tamer F. Abdelmaguid, 2023. "Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Machine Selection in Manufacturing and Construction: Recent Trends," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Manuel Sousa & Maria Fatima Almeida & Rodrigo Calili, 2021. "Multiple Criteria Decision Making for the Achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-37, April.
    4. Tuan, Vu Anh & Van Truong, Nguyen & Tetsuo, Shimizu & An, Nguyen Ngoc, 2022. "Public transport service quality: Policy prioritization strategy in the importance-performance analysis and the three-factor theory frameworks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 118-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksandar Aleksić & Danijela Tadić, 2023. "Industrial and Management Applications of Type-2 Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Techniques Extended with Type-2 Fuzzy Sets from 2013 to 2022," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Yan Xu & Huajie Yang & Zibin Ye & Xiaobo Ma & Lei Tong & Xinyi Yu, 2025. "Leveraging Advanced Mathematical Methods in Artificial Intelligence to Explore Heterogeneity and Asymmetry in Cross-Border Travel Satisfaction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Idiano D’Adamo & Marialucia Della Sciucca & Massimo Gastaldi & Barbara Lupi, 2025. "Indicator Assessment of Sustainable Development Goals: A Global Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-30, September.
    4. Mohammed Alghassab, 2023. "A Computational Case Study on Sustainable Energy Transition in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Wu, Xingli & Liao, Huchang, 2025. "Determining investment allocation strategies to improve consumer satisfaction based on a preference learning model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Ewa Roszkowska & Marzena Filipowicz-Chomko & Dorota Górecka & Elżbieta Majewska, 2024. "Sustainable Cities and Communities in EU Member States: A Multi-Criteria Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-32, December.
    7. Hussain, Atif & Shafiq, Adnan & Awan, Muhammad Usman & Hashmi, Junaid Iqbal, 2025. "A text mining study of online reviews to understand intercity bus service quality," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 325-335.
    8. Dorota Górecka & Ewa Roszkowska, 2025. "Enhancing Spatial Analysis through Reference Multi-Criteria Methods: A Study Evaluating EU Countries in terms of Sustainable Cities and Communities," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 1-42, March.
    9. Maiquiel Schmidt de Oliveira & Flavio Trojan & Vilmar Steffen, 2025. "Model for Definition of Multi-Criteria Compensation by the ICCI (Inter-Criteria Compensation Index) in the Ranking of Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Islam, Md. Rabiul & Aziz, Md. Tareq & Alauddin, Mohammed & Kader, Zarjes & Islam, Md. Rakibul, 2024. "Site suitability assessment for solar power plants in Bangladesh: A GIS-based analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    11. Uwe Götze & Fanny Richter & Julia Döring, 2024. "A Stakeholder-Related Procedure Model for Social Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Bijay Halder & Papiya Banik & Hussein Almohamad & Ahmed Abdullah Al Dughairi & Motrih Al-Mutiry & Haya Falah Al Shahrani & Hazem Ghassan Abdo, 2022. "Land Suitability Investigation for Solar Power Plant Using GIS, AHP and Multi-Criteria Decision Approach: A Case of Megacity Kolkata, West Bengal, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel & Matheus Pereira Libório & Laura Cozzi Ribeiro & Mateus Alberto Dorna de Oliveira Ferreira & Joel Gomes Pereira Junior, 2024. "Multi-Criteria Decision under Uncertainty as Applied to Resource Allocation and Its Computing Implementation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Idiano D’Adamo & Cristina Di Carlo & Massimo Gastaldi & Edouard Nicolas Rossi & Antonio Felice Uricchio, 2024. "Economic Performance, Environmental Protection and Social Progress: A Cluster Analysis Comparison towards Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    15. Alexandra-Nicoleta Ciucu (Durnoi) & Kosyo Stoychev & Camelia Delcea & Vanesa Madalina Vargas & Carmen Pauna, 2024. "Regional SDG Performance in Bulgaria and Romania: Poverty, Education, and Decent Work," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(Special 1), pages 1208-1208, November.
    16. Turhan Karakaya & Hamit Metin Örnek & Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu, 2025. "Multi-Criteria Sustainability Analysis for Variable Refrigerant Flow System Manufacturer Selection: An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Environmental and Technical Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-29, January.
    17. Chen Liang & Dongshi Sun & Danlan Xie, 2023. "Identifying Waste Supply Chain Coordination Barriers with Fuzzy MCDM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    18. Renata Aguayo Lopes da Silva & Renato Cesar Gonçalves Robert & Thomas Purfürst, 2023. "How Is the Forest Sector’s Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Being Addressed? A Systematic Review of the Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, June.
    19. E. Ricciolini & L. Rocchi & M. Cardinali & L. Paolotti & F. Ruiz & J. M. Cabello & A. Boggia, 2022. "Assessing Progress Towards SDGs Implementation Using Multiple Reference Point Based Multicriteria Methods: The Case Study of the European Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1233-1260, August.
    20. Arlene Lu-Gonzales & Takuji W. Tsusaka & Sylvia Szabo & Reuben M. J. Kadigi & Camilla Blasi Foglietti & Seree Park & Zoe Matthews, 2023. "Evaluating the Contribution of Complex International Research-for-Development Programmes to the Sustainable Development Goals," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(2), pages 380-401, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7837-:d:1738562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.