IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10396-d1531090.html

A Stakeholder-Related Procedure Model for Social Sustainability Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Uwe Götze

    (Chair of Management Accounting and Control, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09111 Chemnitz, Germany)

  • Fanny Richter

    (Chair of Management Accounting and Control, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09111 Chemnitz, Germany)

  • Julia Döring

    (Chair of Management Accounting and Control, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09111 Chemnitz, Germany)

Abstract

The importance of assessing the sustainability of companies and their activities is increasing. Especially since the implementation of the new Corporate Social Reporting Directive, even more companies are committed to reporting on the impacts of their businesses on sustainability. This is a challenge especially concerning the social dimension of sustainability. Some frameworks present various relevant social criteria that can be used as a basis for assessment. However, these do not provide detailed suggestions for handling the numerous methodological challenges of such a multi-criteria assessment: identification and selection of the relevant stakeholders, categories and indicators to measure the impacts on social sustainability, weighting and aggregation of these criteria, etc. Therefore, this paper contributes to the methodology of social sustainability assessment by presenting a procedure model for this specific assessment task. The novelty of the model results from its foundation by a review of methods for selection, normalisation, weighting and aggregation of social criteria, existing decision theory-based procedure models, as well as a stakeholder-oriented catalogue of criteria. The procedure model is structured hierarchically by subdividing the overall social sustainability-assessment task into different levels: stakeholders, categories, and indicators. Furthermore, appropriate methods are suggested for the single steps of the procedure model.

Suggested Citation

  • Uwe Götze & Fanny Richter & Julia Döring, 2024. "A Stakeholder-Related Procedure Model for Social Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10396-:d:1531090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10396/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10396/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mani, Venkatesh & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & Mani, Kavitha T.N., 2020. "Supply chain social sustainability in small and medium manufacturing enterprises and firms’ performance: Empirical evidence from an emerging Asian economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    2. Manuel Sousa & Maria Fatima Almeida & Rodrigo Calili, 2021. "Multiple Criteria Decision Making for the Achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-37, April.
    3. Bary, Ghulam, 2022. "Analysis of chaos-coherence peculiarities within the chaotic phenomena of fluid at finite temperature," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    4. Shamsheer Haq & Ismet Boz, 2020. "Measuring environmental, economic, and social sustainability index of tea farms in Rize Province, Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2545-2567, March.
    5. Mauro Lizot & Andreia S. Goffi & Shirley S. Thesari & Flavio Trojan & Paulo S. L. P. Afonso & Paula F. V. Ferreira, 2021. "Multi-criteria methodology for selection of wastewater treatment systems with economic, social, technical and environmental aspects," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 9827-9851, July.
    6. George da Mota Passos Neto & Luciana Hazin Alencar & Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez, 2023. "Multiple-Criteria Methods for Assessing Social Sustainability in the Built Environment: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-24, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ilyas Masudin & Muhammad Iqbal Syahrial & Dian Palupi Restuputri & S. Sarifah Radiah Shariff, 2026. "From Cradle to Caution: Assessing Social Sustainability Risks in Veneer Manufacturing Via Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-28, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenming Liu & Jingjing Li, 2025. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Knowledge Dynamics in Rural Tourism Supply Chains: Challenges, Innovations, and Cross-Sector Applications," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 6732-6764, June.
    2. Abdullah Yıldızbaşı & Cihat Öztürk & Deniz Efendioğlu & Serol Bulkan, 2021. "Assessing the social sustainable supply chain indicators using an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods: a case study of Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4285-4320, March.
    3. Aleksandar Aleksić & Danijela Tadić, 2023. "Industrial and Management Applications of Type-2 Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Techniques Extended with Type-2 Fuzzy Sets from 2013 to 2022," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Jamshed Raza & Yuxin Liu & Jianwei Zhang & Nan Zhu & Zohaib Hassan & Habib Gul & Sikander Hussain, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Management Practices and Sustainability Performance: The Dynamic Capability Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    5. Roheel Ahmed Siddiqi & Anna Paola Codini & Muhammad Ishtiaq Ishaq & Dima Rachid Jamali & Ali Raza, 2025. "Sustainable supply chain, dynamic capabilities, eco‐innovation, and environmental performance in an emerging economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 338-350, January.
    6. Gökçe Koç & Ayşe Uzmay, 2024. "Construction of a Farm-Level Food Security Index: Case Study of Turkish Dairy Farms," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(2), pages 687-714, November.
    7. R. Rajesh, 2023. "Grey Markov Models for Predicting the Social Sustainability Performances of Firms," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 297-351, August.
    8. Moreno-Miranda, Carlos & Dries, Liesbeth, 2022. "Integrating coordination mechanisms in the sustainability assessment of agri-food chains: From a structured literature review to a comprehensive framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    9. Adelaide Martins & Manuel Castelo Branco & Pedro Novo Melo & Carolina Machado, 2022. "Sustainability in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, May.
    10. Simone Sehnem & Ana Cláudia Lara & Karen Benetti & Kurt Schneider & Maiara Lais Marcon & Tiago Hilário Hennemann Silva, 2024. "Improving startups through excellence initiatives: addressing circular economy and innovation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 15237-15283, June.
    11. repec:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:10:p:3635-3645 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Michael Christofi & Huda Khan & Lea Iaia, 2024. "Responsible innovation in Asia: A systematic review and an agenda for future research," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 1085-1127, September.
    13. Aikaterini Anagnostopoulou & Dimitris Sotiropoulos & Konstantinos Tserpes, 2025. "A Robust Sustainability Assessment Methodology for Aircraft Parts: Application to a Fuselage Panel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-33, April.
    14. Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan & Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik & Simonov Kusi‐Sarpong & Syed Imran Zaman & Syed Hasnain Alam Kazmi, 2021. "Social sustainable supply chains in the food industry: A perspective of an emerging economy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 404-418, January.
    15. Idiano D’Adamo & Marialucia Della Sciucca & Massimo Gastaldi & Barbara Lupi, 2025. "Indicator Assessment of Sustainable Development Goals: A Global Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-30, September.
    16. Stekelorum, Rebecca & Laguir, Issam & ElBaz, Jamal, 2020. "Can you hear the Eco? From SME environmental responsibility to social requirements in the supply chain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    17. Mohammed Alghassab, 2023. "A Computational Case Study on Sustainable Energy Transition in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Ewa Roszkowska & Marzena Filipowicz-Chomko & Dorota Górecka & Elżbieta Majewska, 2024. "Sustainable Cities and Communities in EU Member States: A Multi-Criteria Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-32, December.
    19. Kumari, Alka & Singh, Manvendra Pratap, 2023. "A journey of social sustainability in organization during MDG & SDG period: A bibliometric analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    20. Shu Yu & Yongtong Mu, 2022. "Sustainable Agricultural Development Assessment: A Comprehensive Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    21. Sarkar, Biswajit & Sarkar, Mitali & Ganguly, Baishakhi & Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo, 2021. "Combined effects of carbon emission and production quality improvement for fixed lifetime products in a sustainable supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10396-:d:1531090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.