Author
Listed:
- Idiano D’Adamo
(Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)
- Marialucia Della Sciucca
(University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)
- Massimo Gastaldi
(Department of Industrial and Information Engineering and Economics, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)
- Barbara Lupi
(Struttura Commissariale Ricostruzione Sisma 2016, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, 00184 Rome, Italy)
Abstract
This study compares the progress of 141 countries towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), using a multi-criteria approach based on 72 indicators from the Sustainable Development Report 2024. The adoption of two aggregation methods—min-max and TOPSIS—has made it possible to highlight both the sensitivity of the results to the techniques used and the moderate consistency between the rankings obtained. Sweden comes out on top using the min-max method, followed by Finland and Denmark. The TOPSIS method, on the other hand, rewards Croatia, followed by Brazil and Sweden. The aggregate ranking by position shows Sweden ahead of Finland and Croatia, and there are sixteen European countries in the top twenty. The analysis using the min-max method reveals Sweden’s leadership in economic sustainability, Belarus’s in environmental sustainability, and Denmark’s in social sustainability. At the continental level, Europe—particularly the Nordic countries—stands out as an area of excellence in all dimensions, although North America emerges as the leader in the economic dimension. Africa, instead, shows the poorest results. Furthermore, a comparison between OECD and BRICS+ countries shows a clear superiority of the former, especially in the social sphere. The findings highlight the pressing need for enhanced commitment to the SDGs, calling for coherent, cross-sectoral strategies and long-term global vision in policymaking.
Suggested Citation
Idiano D’Adamo & Marialucia Della Sciucca & Massimo Gastaldi & Barbara Lupi, 2025.
"Indicator Assessment of Sustainable Development Goals: A Global Perspective,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-30, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8259-:d:1749285
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8259-:d:1749285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.