IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7747-d1736332.html

Coordinated Port–Industry–City Development from a Green Port Perspective: An Empirical Study of Shanghai Port

Author

Listed:
  • Jianxun Wang

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)

  • Haiyan Wang

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
    State Key Laboratory of Maritime Technology and Safety, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)

  • Fuyou Tan

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)

Abstract

In the context of China’s ‘dual carbon’ strategy, sustainable port–city integration has become critical for regional transformation. Based on the green development perspective, this study constructed a “port–industry–city” (PIC) coordinated development indicator system, conceptualizing ports, industries, and cities as distinct but interrelated subsystems. An improved coupling coordination degree model and an obstacle degree model were employed to analyze the coordinated development between Shanghai Port and its associated industries and urban areas during the green transformation process from 2014 to 2023. Three key findings were found: (1) The comprehensive development index of Shanghai Port exhibited a W-shaped fluctuation followed by rapid growth, while the overall PIC system showed a continuous upward trajectory, with the overall development level steadily rising. (2) During Shanghai Port’s green transformation process, the coordination level of the PIC system improved from moderate imbalance to intermediate coordination, though the overall level still requires improvement. (3) Port green transformation, infrastructure, and urban ecology represent primary obstacles requiring targeted, sustainable interventions. This study enriches the research on port–industry–city coordination and provides both theoretical support and a policy foundation for promoting regional sustainable development led by green port initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianxun Wang & Haiyan Wang & Fuyou Tan, 2025. "Coordinated Port–Industry–City Development from a Green Port Perspective: An Empirical Study of Shanghai Port," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-26, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7747-:d:1736332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7747/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7747/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ma, Qifei & Li, Sujuan & Jia, Peng & Kuang, Haibo, 2025. "Is port integration a panacea for regions green development: An empirical study of China port city," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 15-28.
    2. Tadeusz Bocheński & Tadeusz Palmowski & Tomasz Studzieniecki, 2021. "The Development of Major Seaports in the Context of National Maritime Policy. The Case Study of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Hentschel, Moritz & Ketter, Wolfgang & Collins, John, 2018. "Renewable energy cooperatives: Facilitating the energy transition at the Port of Rotterdam," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 61-69.
    4. Romuald Lacoste & Marie Douet, 2013. "The adaptation of the landlord port model to France's major seaports: a critical analysis of local solutions," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 27-47, January.
    5. Min Wang & Yu Lan & Huayu Li & Xiaodong Jing & Sitong Lu & Kexin Deng, 2024. "Spatial–Temporal Differentiation and Trend Prediction of Coupling Coordination Degree of Port Environmental Efficiency and Urban Economy: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Witte, Patrick & Wiegmans, Bart & Louw, Erik, 2025. "More claims than land: Multi-facetted land use challenges in the port-city interface," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    7. Zhengxin He & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam & Maohan Liang, 2023. "Impact of Disruption on Ship Emissions in Port: Case of Pandemic in Long Beach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Bottasso, Anna & Conti, Maurizio & Ferrari, Claudio & Tei, Alessio, 2014. "Ports and regional development: A spatial analysis on a panel of European regions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 44-55.
    9. Yu Wan & Chengfeng Huang & Wenwen Zhou & Mingwu Liu, 2023. "Evaluation of the Coupling Synergy Degree of Inland Ports and Industries along the Yangtze River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Cong, Long-ze & Zhang, Dong & Wang, Ming-li & Xu, Hong-feng & Li, Li, 2020. "The role of ports in the economic development of port cities: Panel evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 13-21.
    11. Lianhua Liu & Hai Ping, 2020. "Study of the Influencing Factors on Development of Ports in Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macao from the Perspective of Spatial Economics," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-12, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Zhen & Woo, Su-Han & Lai, Po-Lin & Chen, Xiaoyi, 2022. "The economic impact of inland ports on regional development: Evidence from the Yangtze River region," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 80-91.
    2. Hongchu Yu & Zheng Guo & Lei Xu, 2025. "Research on Port Competitiveness Dynamics in China Under the Background of Free Trade Zone and Port Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-33, June.
    3. Zhao, Deng & Zhen-fu, Li & Yu-tao, Zhou & Xiao, Chen & Shan-shan, Liang, 2020. "Measurement and spatial spillover effects of port comprehensive strength: Empirical evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 288-298.
    4. Jiewei Li & Ruihua Zhu, 2022. "The Impact and Spillover Effects of Chinese Ports on Urban Service Industry under De‐maritimization: A Perspective for Port Economic Geography Analysis," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 30(4), pages 31-59, July.
    5. Ferrari, Claudio & Parola, Francesco & Tei, Alessio, 2015. "Governance models and port concessions in Europe: Commonalities, critical issues and policy perspectives," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 60-67.
    6. Li, Jiewei & Li, Xiaobing & Zhu, Ruihua, 2023. "Effects of ports on urban economic geography: A study based on the natural experiment of decentralization reform in China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Zhang, Jun-Qing & Woo, Su-Han & Li, Kevin X., 2024. "Port-city synergism and regional development policy: Evidence from the Yangtze River Region," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    8. Quintano, Claudio & Mazzocchi, Paolo & Rocca, Antonella, 2021. "Evaluation of the eco-efficiency of territorial districts with seaport economic activities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Cong, Long-ze & Zhang, Dong & Wang, Ming-li & Xu, Hong-feng & Li, Li, 2020. "The role of ports in the economic development of port cities: Panel evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 13-21.
    10. Kirchhoff, Hannes & Strunz, Kai, 2019. "Key drivers for successful development of peer-to-peer microgrids for swarm electrification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(C), pages 46-62.
    11. Mounir Amdaoud & César Ducruet & Marc‐Antoine Faure, 2022. "The mutual specialization of port and urban functions: The case of France," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(2), pages 439-460, April.
    12. Zewdie Habte Shikur, 2022. "Logistics Performance, Export, Agricultural, Manufacturing, and Aggregate Economic Growth: A Focus on Sectoral Perspectives," Journal of Economic Development, The Economic Research Institute, Chung-Ang University, vol. 47(3), pages 107-123.
    13. W. Matekenya & R. Ncwadi, 2022. "The impact of maritime transport financing on total trade in South Africa," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Yang, Jinglei & Luo, Meifeng & Ji, Abing, 2016. "Analyzing the spatial–temporal evolution of a gateway’s hinterland: A case study of Shanghai, China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 355-367.
    15. Jiaguo Liu & Jinxia Zhou & Fan Liu & Xiaohang Yue & Yudan Kong & Xiaoye Wang, 2019. "Interaction Analysis and Sustainable Development Strategy between Port and City: The Case of Liaoning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-25, September.
    16. Jung-In Yeon & Sojung Hwang & Bogang Jun, 2022. "The spillover effect of neighboring port on regional industrial diversification and regional economic resilience," Papers 2204.00189, arXiv.org.
    17. Caldeira dos Santos, Murillo & Pereira, Fábio Henrique, 2021. "Development and application of a dynamic model for road port access and its impacts on port-city relationship indicators," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    18. Fowzia Akter & Shuangquan Wang & Rui Wang & Mostak Ahamed Galib & Zeremariam Yosief Medin & Feifei Song, 2025. "Historic port conservation multi-criteria evaluation based on AHP-TOPSIS: cases from the UK, Spain and China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    19. William Costa & Britaldo Soares-Filho & Rodrigo Nobrega, 2022. "Can the Brazilian National Logistics Plan Induce Port Competitiveness by Reshaping the Port Service Areas?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Adam Przybyłowski & Agnieszka Kałaska & Piotr Przybyłowski, 2022. "Quest for a Tool Measuring Urban Quality of Life: ISO 37120 Standard Sustainable Development Indicators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7747-:d:1736332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.