IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7704-d1733440.html

Blockchain-Based Risk Management in Cross-Border Data Supply Chains: A Comparative Analysis of Alibaba and Infosys

Author

Listed:
  • Snovia Naseem

    (School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

  • Tang Yong

    (School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

Abstract

Cross-border data flows are critical to the operation of global supply chains, particularly for digital enterprises such as Alibaba and Infosys. However, these flows introduce substantial challenges related to digital supply chain risk and cybersecurity management. This study examines how blockchain technology addresses these challenges within the operational contexts of Alibaba and Infosys. Unlike earlier research that often focused on sector-specific implementations or conceptual models, this study positions its findings within broader empirical evidence on blockchain-enabled supply chain governance, offering a comparative perspective that has been largely absent in prior work. Using an explanatory mixed-methods approach, the research combines thematic analysis of 85 peer-reviewed studies with in-depth case evaluations of the two firms. NVivo-based qualitative coding was applied to supporting sources, including GDPR audit reports, blockchain transaction records, and company disclosures. The findings demonstrate that blockchain adoption reduces cybersecurity breaches, enhances data integrity, and improves supply chain resilience. The study further shows how blockchain integration strengthens digital collaboration and regulatory alignment, enabling secure and uninterrupted data flows that support operational continuity and innovation. Overall, the research offers practical insights for digital enterprises and contributes to a deeper understanding of blockchain’s strategic role in cross-border data risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Snovia Naseem & Tang Yong, 2025. "Blockchain-Based Risk Management in Cross-Border Data Supply Chains: A Comparative Analysis of Alibaba and Infosys," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7704-:d:1733440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7704/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7704/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Körner, Marc-Fabian & Sedlmeir, Johannes & Weibelzahl, Martin & Fridgen, Gilbert & Heine, Moreen & Neumann, Christoph, 2022. "Systemic risks in electricity systems: A perspective on the potential of digital technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Atul Kumar Singh & V. R. Prasath Kumar & Muhammad Irfan & Saeed Reza Mohandes & Usama Awan, 2023. "Revealing the Barriers of Blockchain Technology for Supply Chain Transparency and Sustainability in the Construction Industry: An Application of Pythagorean FAHP Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, July.
    3. Niloofar Etemadi & Pieter Van Gelder & Fernanda Strozzi, 2021. "An ISM Modeling of Barriers for Blockchain/Distributed Ledger Technology Adoption in Supply Chains towards Cybersecurity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, April.
    4. Susan Ariel Aaronson & Patrick Leblond, 2018. "Another Digital Divide: The Rise of Data Realms and its Implications for the WTO," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 245-272.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aaronson, Susan Ariel, 2019. "What Are We Talking about When We Talk about Digital Protectionism?," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 541-577, October.
    2. Pohle, Julia & Thiel, Thorsten, 2021. "Digital Sovereignty," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 47-67.
    3. Idiano D’Adamo & Rocío González-Sánchez & Maria Sonia Medina-Salgado & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2021. "E-Commerce Calls for Cyber-Security and Sustainability: How European Citizens Look for a Trusted Online Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Kamin, Katrin & Bernoth, Kerstin & Felbermayr, Gabriel & Fratzscher, Marcel & Hoffmann, Mia & Poitiers, Niclas & Rieth, Malte & Weil, Pauline & Wolff, Guntram B. & Zachmann, Georg & Dombrowski, Jacque, 2021. "Instruments of a strategic foreign economic policy: Study for the German Federal Foreign Office," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 314956, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    5. Ali Cheshmehzangi & Tong Zou & Zhaohui Su & Ayotunde Dawodu & Saeid Pourroostaei Ardakani & Maycon Sedrez & Tian Tang, 2024. "Growing Digital Divide for Expatriates Population in China: A User Perspective Analysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, October.
    6. Martina Francesca Ferracane & Erik van der Marel, 2021. "Regulating Personal Data," World Bank Publications - Reports 35308, The World Bank Group.
    7. Arpit Singh & Ashish Dwivedi & Dindayal Agrawal & Surajit Bag & Anurag Chauhan, 2024. "Can sustainable and digital objectives synchronize? A study of ESG activities for digital supply chains using multi‐methods," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8413-8435, December.
    8. Robert Wolfe, 2018. "Learning about digital trade: Privacy and e-commerce in CETA and TPP," RSCAS Working Papers 2018/27, European University Institute.
    9. Manfred Elsig & Sebastian Klotz, 2021. "Digital Trade Rules in Preferential Trade Agreements: Is There a WTO Impact?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S4), pages 25-36, May.
    10. Hao Wang & Dalei Wu & Yunmin Zeng, 2025. "Digital economy, market segmentation and carbon emission performance," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(10), pages 23727-23751, October.
    11. Lin, Boqiang & Huang, Chenchen, 2023. "How will promoting the digital economy affect electricity intensity?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    12. Luciano Ciravegna & Snejina Michailova, 2022. "Why the world economy needs, but will not get, more globalization in the post-COVID-19 decade," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(1), pages 172-186, February.
    13. Jonathan Lautenschlager & Jan Stramm & Tobias Guggenberger & Nils Urbach, 2025. "Striking a balance: Designing a blockchain-based solution to navigate coopetition dynamics in supply chain management," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-24, December.
    14. Vahid Arabzadeh & Raphael Frank, 2025. "Stochastic Markov-Based Modelling of Residential Lighting Demand in Luxembourg: Integrating Occupant Behavior and Energy Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-34, September.
    15. Önnered, Simon & Johansson, Peter E. & Stefan, Ioana & Fundin, Anders, 2025. "Emerging threats to energy security - a Delphi study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    16. Zibiao Li & Han Li & Siwei Wang, 2022. "How Multidimensional Digital Empowerment Affects Technology Innovation Performance: The Moderating Effect of Adaptability to Technology Embedding," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, November.
    17. Vimal K.E. K & Sivakumar K & Jayakrishna Kandasamy & Vaibhav Venkat & Raghuraman Srinivasan Mani, 2023. "Barriers to the adoption of digital technologies in a functional circular economy network," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1541-1561, September.
    18. Sylwia Konecka & Zbigniew Bentyn, 2024. "Cyberattacks as Threats in Supply Chains," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 778-796.
    19. Xu, Ru-Yu & Wang, Ke-Liang & Miao, Zhuang, 2024. "The impact of digital technology innovation on green total-factor energy efficiency in China: Does economic development matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    20. Anchal Gupta & Rajesh Kumar Singh & Muhammad Mustafa Kamal, 2026. "Blockchain technology adoption for secured and carbon neutral logistics operations: barrier intensity index framework," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 359(1), pages 861-894, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7704-:d:1733440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.