IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p7169-d1719954.html

Exploring Imperatives in Generation Z’s Approach to the Future of the Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Daniluk

    (Faculty of Security Sciences, General Tadeusz Kosciuszko Military University of Land Forces, Piotra Czajkowskiego 109 Str., 51-147 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Radoslaw Wisniewski

    (School of Business, VIZJA University, Okopowa 59 Str., 01-043 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Aneta Nowakowska-Krystman

    (School of Social Sciences, VIZJA University, Okopowa 59 Str., 01-043 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Tomasz Kownacki

    (School of Social Sciences, VIZJA University, Okopowa 59 Str., 01-043 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Dawid Wiśniewski

    (School of Business, VIZJA University, Okopowa 59 Str., 01-043 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Environmental protection is one of the key challenges facing mankind today. Finding out what young people, referred to as Generation Z, think about this issue is extremely important, as they will be the first to experience the negative effects of environmental degradation. Research has shown that Generation Z has the greatest hope for solutions from the technological sphere. Thus, the economic and political spheres should support the development of technology in this area. The social sphere is rated lowest, which may reflect young people’s personal withdrawal and the delegation of responsibility for the environment’s future to engineers, entrepreneurs, and politicians. It is equally important to learn what constitutes an environmental imperative for Generation Z. It is based on new energy sources, energy producers, and the state’s pursuit of a policy of international cooperation in this area, supported by national legislative activity toward entrepreneurs and citizens. Research has demonstrated the need to raise awareness among young people, with a focus on individuals treated as subjects in their interaction with modern technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Daniluk & Radoslaw Wisniewski & Aneta Nowakowska-Krystman & Tomasz Kownacki & Dawid Wiśniewski, 2025. "Exploring Imperatives in Generation Z’s Approach to the Future of the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-31, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7169-:d:1719954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7169/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7169/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xie, Xiaohong & Osińska, Magdalena & Szczepaniak, Małgorzata, 2023. "Do young generations save for retirement? Ensuring financial security of Gen Z and Gen Y," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 644-668.
    2. Radoslaw Wisniewski & Piotr Daniluk & Tomasz Kownacki & Aneta Nowakowska-Krystman, 2022. "Energy System Development Scenarios: Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-31, April.
    3. Taalbi, Josef, 2017. "What drives innovation? Evidence from economic history," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1437-1453.
    4. Michał Bernard Pietrzak & Bartłomiej Igliński & Wojciech Kujawski & Paweł Iwański, 2021. "Energy Transition in Poland—Assessment of the Renewable Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Piotr Daniluk, 2021. "Strategic Analysis of Energy Security. Methodological Aspects of the Scenario Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    6. Szymkowiak, Andrzej & Melović, Boban & Dabić, Marina & Jeganathan, Kishokanth & Kundi, Gagandeep Singh, 2021. "Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. Joanna Sawicka & Elżbieta Marcinkowska, 2023. "Environmental CSR and the Purchase Declarations of Generation Z Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Aleksandra Kuzior & Katarzyna Anna Postrzednik-Lotko & Brygida Smołka-Franke & Bartosz Sobotka, 2023. "Managing Competences of Generation Y and Z in the Opinion of the Management Staff in the Modern Business Services Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Sharif, Arshian & Raza, Syed Ali & Ozturk, Ilhan & Afshan, Sahar, 2019. "The dynamic relationship of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption with carbon emission: A global study with the application of heterogeneous panel estimations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 685-691.
    10. Dosi, Giovanni, 1993. "Technological paradigms and technological trajectories : A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 102-103, April.
    11. Radoslaw Wisniewski & Aneta Nowakowska-Krystman & Tomasz Kownacki & Piotr Daniluk, 2024. "The Impact of the Rule of Law on Energy Policy in European Union Member States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-31, February.
    12. Carlota Perez, 2010. "Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 34(1), pages 185-202, January.
    13. Hengtian Wang & Xiaolong Yang & Xinxin Xu & Liu Fei, 2021. "Exploring Opportunities and Challenges of Solar PV Power under Carbon Peak Scenario in China: A PEST Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-28, May.
    14. Radoslaw Wisniewski & Piotr Daniluk & Aneta Nowakowska-Krystman & Tomasz Kownacki, 2022. "Critical Success Factors of the Energy Sector Security Strategy: The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-27, August.
    15. Fanny Saruchera, 2025. "RETRACTED: Sustainability: A Concept in Flux? The Role of Multidisciplinary Insights in Shaping Sustainable Futures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, January.
    16. Hamid Hamoudi & Carmen Avilés-Palacios, 2023. "Product Sustainability and Consumer Environmental Awareness in Differentiated Markets," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 29(4), pages 277-291, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radoslaw Wisniewski & Tomasz Kownacki & Aneta Nowakowska-Krystman & Anna Wierzchowska & Piotr Daniluk & Krzysztof Puwalski, 2025. "The Attitudes of Generation Z Women to Sustainable Development—Aspects of SPET," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-35, August.
    2. Khraisha, Tamer, 2020. "Complex economic problems and fitness landscapes: Assessment and methodological perspectives," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 390-407.
    3. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello, 2022. "Top R&D investors, structural change and the R&D growth performance of young and old firms," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, March.
    4. Ekaterina Prytkova, 2021. "ICT's Wide Web: a System-Level Analysis of ICT's Industrial Diffusion with Algorithmic Links," Jena Economics Research Papers 2021-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    5. Rita Strohmaier & Marlies Schuetz & Simone Vannuccini, 2019. "A systemic perspective on socioeconomic transformation in the digital age," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 46(3), pages 361-378, September.
    6. Giovanni Dosi & Richard Nelson, 2013. "The Evolution of Technologies: An Assessment of the State-of-the-Art," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 3(1), pages 3-46, June.
    7. Cantner, Uwe & Vannuccini, Simone, 2021. "Pervasive technologies and industrial linkages: Modeling acquired purposes," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 386-399.
    8. Rafael Palacios Bustamante & Xochitl Margarita Cruz Pérez & María Pilar Escott-Mota, 2024. "Radical Change and Dominant Character of Digital Transformation in Artificial Intelligence Entrepreneurship in Less Innovative Economies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 19490-19516, December.
    9. Yan, Hong-Bin & Li, Ming, 2022. "Consumer demand based recombinant search for idea generation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    10. Glover, Dominic & Poole, Nigel, 2019. "Principles of innovation to build nutrition-sensitive food systems in South Asia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 63-73.
    11. Roberta Capello & Camilla Lenzi, 2018. "The dynamics of regional learning paradigms and trajectories," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 727-748, September.
    12. Uwe Cantner & Holger Graf & Ekaterina Prytkova & Simone Vannuccini, 2018. "The Compositional Nature of Productivity and Innovation Slowdown," Jena Economics Research Papers 2018-006, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    13. Rinaldo Evangelista, 2018. "Technology and Economic Development: The Schumpeterian Legacy," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 50(1), pages 136-153, March.
    14. Giacomo Damioli & Vincent Van Roy & Daniel Vertesy & Marco Vivarelli, 2024. "AI as a new emerging technological paradigm: evidence from global patenting," DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Politica Economica dipe0038, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    15. Nasirov, Shukhrat & Castaldi, Carolina, 2025. "Servitization as a strategy for diffusing radical technologies: An analysis of U.S. top corporate R&D investors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    16. Jacopo Staccioli & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2021. "Back to the past: the historical roots of labor-saving automation," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(1), pages 27-57, March.
    17. Radoslaw Wisniewski & Piotr Daniluk & Aneta Nowakowska-Krystman & Tomasz Kownacki, 2022. "Critical Success Factors of the Energy Sector Security Strategy: The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-27, August.
    18. Ichiro Watanabe & Soichiro Takagi, 2022. "NK model-based analysis of technological trajectories: a study on the technological field of computer graphic processing systems," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 119-140, April.
    19. Yoruk, Esin & Radosevic, Slavo & Fischer, Bruno, 2023. "Technological profiles, upgrading and the dynamics of growth: Country-level patterns and trajectories across distinct stages of development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    20. Xu, Jiuping & Li, Li & Zheng, Bobo, 2016. "Wind energy generation technological paradigm diffusion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 436-449.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7169-:d:1719954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.