IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p7069-d1717331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model for Planning and Optimization of Train Crew Rosters for Sustainable Railway Transport

Author

Listed:
  • Zdenka Bulková

    (Department of Railway Transport, Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Juraj Čamaj

    (Department of Railway Transport, Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Jozef Gašparík

    (Department of Railway Transport, Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia)

Abstract

Efficient planning of train crew rosters is a key factor in ensuring operational reliability and promoting long-term sustainability in railway transport, both economically and socially. This article presents a systematic approach to developing a crew rostering model in passenger rail transport, with a focus on the operational setting of the train crew depot in Česká Třebová, a city in the Czech Republic. The seven-step methodology includes identifying available train shifts, defining scheduling constraints, creating roster variants, and calculating personnel and time requirements for each option. The proposed roster reduced staffing needs by two employees, increased the average shift duration to 9 h and 42 min, and decreased non-productive time by 384 h annually. These improvements enhance sustainability by optimizing human resource use, lowering unnecessary energy consumption, and improving employees’ work–life balance. The model also provides a quantitative assessment of operational feasibility and economic efficiency. Compared to existing rosters, the proposed model offers clear advantages and remains applicable even in settings with limited technological support. The findings show that a well-designed rostering system can contribute not only to cost savings and personnel stabilization, but also to broader objectives in sustainable public transport, supporting resilient and resource-efficient rail operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Zdenka Bulková & Juraj Čamaj & Jozef Gašparík, 2025. "Model for Planning and Optimization of Train Crew Rosters for Sustainable Railway Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-33, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7069-:d:1717331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7069/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7069/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silke Jütte & Marc Albers & Ulrich W. Thonemann & Knut Haase, 2011. "Optimizing Railway Crew Scheduling at DB Schenker," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 109-122, April.
    2. Erwin Abbink & Matteo Fischetti & Leo Kroon & Gerrit Timmer & Michiel Vromans, 2005. "Reinventing Crew Scheduling at Netherlands Railways," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 393-401, October.
    3. Heil, Julia & Hoffmann, Kirsten & Buscher, Udo, 2020. "Railway crew scheduling: Models, methods and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 405-425.
    4. Fuentes, Manuel & Cadarso, Luis & Marín, Ángel, 2019. "A hybrid model for crew scheduling in rail rapid transit networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 248-265.
    5. Alberto Caprara & Paolo Toth & Daniele Vigo & Matteo Fischetti, 1998. "Modeling and Solving the Crew Rostering Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(6), pages 820-830, December.
    6. A.T. Ernst & H. Jiang & M. Krishnamoorthy & H. Nott & D. Sier, 2001. "An Integrated Optimization Model for Train Crew Management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 108(1), pages 211-224, November.
    7. Erwin Abbink & Dennis Huisman & Leo Kroon, 2018. "Railway Crew Management," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Ralf Borndörfer & Torsten Klug & Leonardo Lamorgese & Carlo Mannino & Markus Reuther & Thomas Schlec (ed.), Handbook of Optimization in the Railway Industry, chapter 0, pages 243-264, Springer.
    8. A. Mingozzi & M. A. Boschetti & S. Ricciardelli & L. Bianco, 1999. "A Set Partitioning Approach to the Crew Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(6), pages 873-888, December.
    9. Van den Bergh, Jorne & Beliën, Jeroen & De Bruecker, Philippe & Demeulemeester, Erik & De Boeck, Liesje, 2013. "Personnel scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 367-385.
    10. Panayiotis Alefragis & Peter Sanders & Tuomo Takkula & Dag Wedelin, 2000. "Parallel Integer Optimization for Crew Scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 99(1), pages 141-166, December.
    11. van Rossum, B.T.C. & Dollevoet, T. & Huisman, D., 2024. "Railway crew planning with fairness over time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 55-70.
    12. Carraresi, P. & Gallo, G., 1984. "Network models for vehicle and crew scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 139-151, May.
    13. Huisman, Dennis, 2007. "A column generation approach for the rail crew re-scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(1), pages 163-173, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heil, Julia & Hoffmann, Kirsten & Buscher, Udo, 2020. "Railway crew scheduling: Models, methods and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 405-425.
    2. Neufeld, Janis S. & Scheffler, Martin & Tamke, Felix & Hoffmann, Kirsten & Buscher, Udo, 2021. "An efficient column generation approach for practical railway crew scheduling with attendance rates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 1113-1130.
    3. Breugem, T. & van Rossum, B.T.C. & Dollevoet, T. & Huisman, D., 2022. "A column generation approach for the integrated crew re-planning problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. van Rossum, B.T.C. & Dollevoet, T. & Huisman, D., 2024. "Railway crew planning with fairness over time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 55-70.
    5. Thomas Breugem & Twan Dollevoet & Dennis Huisman, 2022. "Is Equality Always Desirable? Analyzing the Trade-Off Between Fairness and Attractiveness in Crew Rostering," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2619-2641, April.
    6. Masoud Yaghini & Mohammad Karimi & Mohadeseh Rahbar, 2015. "A set covering approach for multi-depot train driver scheduling," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 636-654, April.
    7. Brian Roth & Anantaram Balakrishnan & Pooja Dewan & April Kuo & Dasaradh Mallampati & Juan Morales, 2018. "Crew Decision Assist: System for Optimizing Crew Assignments at BNSF Railway," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 48(5), pages 436-448, October.
    8. Lusby, Richard M. & Larsen, Jesper & Bull, Simon, 2018. "A survey on robustness in railway planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 1-15.
    9. Suyabatmaz, Ali Çetin & Şahin, Güvenç, 2015. "Railway crew capacity planning problem with connectivity of schedules," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 88-100.
    10. Fuentes, Manuel & Cadarso, Luis & Marín, Ángel, 2019. "A hybrid model for crew scheduling in rail rapid transit networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 248-265.
    11. Wolbeck, Lena Antonia, 2019. "Fairness aspects in personnel scheduling," Discussion Papers 2019/16, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    12. Silke Jütte & Daniel Müller & Ulrich W. Thonemann, 2017. "Optimizing railway crew schedules with fairness preferences," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 43-55, February.
    13. Feng, Tao & Lusby, Richard M. & Zhang, Yongxiang & Tao, Siyu & Zhang, Bojian & Peng, Qiyuan, 2024. "A branch-and-price algorithm for integrating urban rail crew scheduling and rostering problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    14. Jesica Armas & Luis Cadarso & Angel A. Juan & Javier Faulin, 2017. "A multi-start randomized heuristic for real-life crew rostering problems in airlines with work-balancing goals," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 258(2), pages 825-848, November.
    15. Borgonjon, Tessa & Maenhout, Broos, 2022. "An exact approach for the personnel task rescheduling problem with task retiming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 465-484.
    16. Young-Chae Hong & Amy Cohn & Stephen Gorga & Edmond O’Brien & William Pozehl & Jennifer Zank, 2019. "Using Optimization Techniques and Multidisciplinary Collaboration to Solve a Challenging Real-World Residency Scheduling Problem," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 201-212, May.
    17. Vaidyanathan, Balachandran, 2007. "Multi-Commodity Network Flow Based Approaches for the Railroad Crew Scheduling Problem," 48th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Boston, Massachusetts, March 15-17, 2007 207928, Transportation Research Forum.
    18. Silke Jütte & Marc Albers & Ulrich W. Thonemann & Knut Haase, 2011. "Optimizing Railway Crew Scheduling at DB Schenker," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 109-122, April.
    19. Breugem, T. & Dollevoet, T.A.B. & Huisman, D., 2017. "Is Equality always desirable?," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2017-30, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    20. Dennis Huisman & Gábor Maróti, 2024. "Operations Research at Netherlands Railways," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 1-6, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7069-:d:1717331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.