IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p7016-d1716005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review and Decision-Making Tree for Methods to Balance Indoor Environmental Comfort and Energy Conservation During Building Operation

Author

Listed:
  • Shan Lin

    (Guangzhou Metro Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510010, China)

  • Yu Zhang

    (School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Xuanjiang Chen

    (Guangzhou Metro Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510010, China)

  • Chengzhi Pan

    (Guangzhou Metro Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510010, China)

  • Xianjun Dong

    (Nanbo Risheng New Energy Technology Co., Ltd., Delingha 817000, China)

  • Xiang Xie

    (School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)

  • Long Chen

    (School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

Abstract

Effective building operation requires a careful balance between energy conservation and indoor environmental comfort. Although numerous methods have been developed to reduce energy consumption during the operational phase, their objectives and applications vary widely. However, the complexity of building energy management makes it challenging to identify the most suitable methods that simultaneously achieve both comfort and efficiency goals. Existing studies often lack a systematic framework that supports integrated decision-making under comfort constraints. This research aims to address this gap by proposing a decision-making tree for selecting energy conservation methods during building operation with an explicit consideration of indoor environmental comfort. A comprehensive literature review is conducted to identify four main energy-consuming components during building operation: the building envelope, HVAC systems, lighting systems, and plug loads and appliances. Three key comfort indicators—thermal comfort, lighting comfort, and air quality comfort—are defined, and energy conservation methods are categorized into three strategic groups: passive strategies, control optimization strategies, and behavioural intervention strategies. Each method is assessed using a defined set of evaluation criteria. Subsequently, a questionnaire survey is administered for the calibration of the decision tree, incorporating stakeholder preferences and expert judgement. The findings contribute to the advancement of understanding regarding the co-optimization of energy conservation and occupant comfort in building operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Shan Lin & Yu Zhang & Xuanjiang Chen & Chengzhi Pan & Xianjun Dong & Xiang Xie & Long Chen, 2025. "Review and Decision-Making Tree for Methods to Balance Indoor Environmental Comfort and Energy Conservation During Building Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-25, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7016-:d:1716005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7016/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7016/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7016-:d:1716005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.