IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6885-d1712550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building an Agent-Based Simulation Framework of Smartphone Reuse and Recycling: Integrating Privacy Concern and Behavioral Norms

Author

Listed:
  • Wenbang Hou

    (Department of Human and Engineered Environmental, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 2778563, Japan)

  • Dingjie Peng

    (Graduate School of Fundamental Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo 1698050, Japan)

  • Jianing Chu

    (Department of Human and Engineered Environmental, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 2778563, Japan)

  • Yuelin Jiang

    (Department of Global Environmental Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 1138654, Japan)

  • Yu Chen

    (Department of Human and Engineered Environmental, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 2778563, Japan)

  • Feier Chen

    (State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, School of Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of electronic waste, driven by the short lifecycle of smartphones and planned obsolescence strategies, presents escalating global environmental challenges. To address these issues from a systems perspective, this study develops an agent-based modeling (ABM) framework that simulates consumer decisions and stakeholder interactions within the smartphone reuse and recycling ecosystem. The model incorporates key behavioral drivers— privacy concerns , moral norms , and financial incentives —to examine how social and economic factors shape consumer behavior. Four primary agent types—consumers, manufacturers, recyclers, and second-hand retailers—are modeled to capture complex feedback and market dynamics. Calibrated using empirical data from Jiangsu Province, China, the simulation reveals a dominant consumer tendency to store obsolete smartphones rather than engage in reuse or formal recycling. However, the introduction of government subsidies significantly shifts behavior, doubling participation in second-hand markets and markedly improving recycling rates. These results highlight the value of integrating behavioral insights into environmental modeling to inform circular economy strategies. By offering a flexible and behaviorally grounded simulation tool, this study supports the design of more effective policies for promoting responsible smartphone disposal and lifecycle extension.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenbang Hou & Dingjie Peng & Jianing Chu & Yuelin Jiang & Yu Chen & Feier Chen, 2025. "Building an Agent-Based Simulation Framework of Smartphone Reuse and Recycling: Integrating Privacy Concern and Behavioral Norms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6885-:d:1712550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6885/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6885/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huifang Ma & Weidong Chen & Hailin Ma & Hude Yang, 2021. "Influence of Publicity and Education and Environmental Values on the Green Consumption Behavior of Urban Residents in Tibet," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Wu, Cheng-Han, 2012. "Product-design and pricing strategies with remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 204-215.
    3. Ramazan Esmeli & Mohamed Bader-El-Den & Hassana Abdullahi, 2021. "Towards early purchase intention prediction in online session based retailing systems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(3), pages 697-715, September.
    4. Meng,Cai & Gustafsson,Bjorn & Knight,John, 2023. "Economic Transformation and Income Distribution in China over Three Decades," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781009467933, January.
    5. Nick Nash & Lorraine Whitmarsh & Stuart Capstick & Tom Hargreaves & Wouter Poortinga & Gregory Thomas & Elena Sautkina & Dimitrios Xenias, 2017. "Climate‐relevant behavioral spillover and the potential contribution of social practice theory," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(6), November.
    6. Tong Shu & Huaisi Liao & Shou Chen & Shouyang Wang & Kin Keung Lai & Lu Gan, 2016. "Analysing remanufacturing decisions of supply chain members in uncertainty of consumer preferences," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(34), pages 3208-3227, July.
    7. Ning Wang & Zhigang Chen & Tianshu Li & Mengjia Zhen, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Pattern Evolution and Influence Mechanism of Urban Vertical Expansion: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Sonja Maria Geiger & Daniel Fischer & Ulf Schrader, 2018. "Measuring What Matters in Sustainable Consumption: An Integrative Framework for the Selection of Relevant Behaviors," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 18-33, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ehsan Shekarian & Simme Douwe Flapper, 2021. "Analyzing the Structure of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    2. Julie Bayle-Cordier & Loïc Berger & Rayan Elatmani & Massimo Tavoni, 2023. "Breath, Love, Walk? The Impact of Mindfulness Interventions on Climate Policy Support and Environmental Attitudes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, July.
    3. Adam Wasilewski & Anna Zgrzywa-Ziemak, 2024. "Multi-variant e-commerce user interfaces for business sustainability," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 34(4), pages 211-229.
    4. Li, Mengfan & Hong, Zhaofu & Guo, Xiaolong & Yu, Yugang, 2025. "Green design and information sharing in a horizontally competitive supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    5. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Fuhao & Lou, Runchi & Wang, Keying, 2023. "How does green finance drive the decarbonization of the economy? Empirical evidence from China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 671-684.
    6. Svenja Damberg & Ulla A. Saari & Morgane Fritz & Vytaute Dlugoborskyte & Katerina Božič, 2024. "Consumers' purchase behavior of Cradle to Cradle Certified® products—The role of trust and supply chain transparency," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8280-8299, December.
    7. Wu, Cheng-Han, 2015. "Strategic and operational decisions under sales competition and collection competition for end-of-use products in remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 11-20.
    8. Gómez, Patricia & Shaikh, Nazrul I. & Erkoc, Murat, 2024. "Continuous improvement in the efficient use of energy in office buildings through peers effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    9. Hazem Ahmed Khairy & Yehia Elzek & Nadir Aliane & Mohamed Fathy Agina, 2023. "Perceived Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Effect on Green Perceived Value and Green Attitude in Hospitality and Tourism Industry: The Mediating Role of Environmental Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Chun-Wei Chen, 2023. "A Feasibility Discussion: Is ML Suitable for Predicting Sustainable Patterns in Consumer Product Preferences?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Huang, Yanting & Wang, Zongjun, 2017. "Values of information sharing: A comparison of supplier-remanufacturing and manufacturer-remanufacturing scenarios," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 20-44.
    12. María Belén Prados‐Peña & Francisco Jesús Gálvez‐Sánchez & Ana García‐López, 2023. "Moving toward sustainable development: Social, economic and environmental value as antecedents of purchase intention in the sustainable crafts sector," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 3024-3037, August.
    13. Santa, Juana Castro & Drews, Stefan, 2023. "Heuristic processing of green advertising: Review and policy implications," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    14. Li, Gendao & Reimann, Marc & Zhang, Weihua, 2018. "When remanufacturing meets product quality improvement: The impact of production cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 913-925.
    15. Cheng-Han Wu, 2021. "Production-quality policy for a make-from-stock remanufacturing system," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 425-456, June.
    16. Carmen Bălan, 2020. "How Does Retail Engage Consumers in Sustainable Consumption? A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    17. Tobias Engelmann & Daniel Fischer & Marianne Lörchner & Jaya Bowry & Holger Rohn, 2019. "“Doing” Sustainability Assessment in Different Consumption and Production Contexts—Lessons from Case Study Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    18. Weckenborg, Christian & Schumacher, Patrick & Thies, Christian & Spengler, Thomas S., 2024. "Flexibility in manufacturing system design: A review of recent approaches from Operations Research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 413-441.
    19. Zhangwei Feng & Na Luo & Sihong Wu & Zheng Joseph Yan, 2025. "Trade-in marketing strategies in gaming industry: The effect of digital transformation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Muris Lage Junior & Moacir Godinho Filho, 2017. "Master disassembly scheduling in a remanufacturing system with stochastic routings," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 25(1), pages 123-138, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6885-:d:1712550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.