IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6775-d1709937.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on the Effectiveness of a Hybrid Digital-Physical Board Game Incorporating the Sustainable Development Goals in Elementary School Sustainability Education

Author

Listed:
  • Jhih-Ning Jhang

    (Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, National Pingtung University, Pingtung 900391, Taiwan)

  • Yi-Chun Lin

    (College of Mountain Dawu, National Pingtung University, Pingtung 900391, Taiwan)

  • Yen-Ting Lin

    (Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, National Pingtung University, Pingtung 900391, Taiwan)

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), launched by the United Nations in 2015, outline 17 interconnected objectives designed to promote human well-being and sustainable development worldwide. Education is recognized by the United Nations as a key factor in promoting sustainable development. To cultivate students with both global perspectives and local engagement, it is essential to integrate sustainability education into elementary curricula. Accordingly, this study aimed to enhance elementary school students’ understanding of the SDGs by designing a structured instructional activity and developing a hybrid digital-physical board game. The game was implemented as a supplementary review tool to traditional classroom teaching, leveraging the motivational and knowledge-retention benefits of physical board games while incorporating digital features to support learning process monitoring. To address the limitations of conventional review approaches—such as reduced student engagement and increased cognitive load—the instructional model incorporated the board game during review sessions following formal instruction. This was intended to maintain student attention and reduce unnecessary cognitive effort, thereby supporting learning in sustainability-related content. A quasi-experimental design was employed to evaluate the effectiveness of the instructional intervention and the board game system, focusing on three outcome variables: learning motivation, cognitive load, and learning achievement. The results indicated that students in the game-based Sustainable Development Goals group achieved significantly higher delayed posttest scores (M = 72.91, SD = 15.17) than the traditional review group (M = 61.30, SD = 22.82; p < 0.05). In addition, they reported significantly higher learning motivation (M = 4.40, SD = 0.64) compared to the traditional group (M = 3.99, SD = 0.69; p < 0.05) and lower cognitive load (M = 1.84, SD = 1.39) compared to the traditional group (M = 2.66, SD = 1.30; p < 0.05), suggesting that the proposed approach effectively supported student learning in sustainability education at the elementary level.

Suggested Citation

  • Jhih-Ning Jhang & Yi-Chun Lin & Yen-Ting Lin, 2025. "A Study on the Effectiveness of a Hybrid Digital-Physical Board Game Incorporating the Sustainable Development Goals in Elementary School Sustainability Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-23, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6775-:d:1709937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6775/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6775/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jorrit Holst & Antje Brock & Mandy Singer-Brodowski & Gerhard de Haan, 2020. "Monitoring Progress of Change: Implementation of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) within Documents of the German Education System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Teresa Berglund & Niklas Gericke & Jelle Boeve-de Pauw & Daniel Olsson & Tzu-Chau Chang, 2020. "A cross-cultural comparative study of sustainability consciousness between students in Taiwan and Sweden," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(7), pages 6287-6313, October.
    3. Hao-Chiang Koong Lin & Yu-Hsuan Lin & Tao-Hua Wang & Lun-Ke Su & Yueh-Min Huang, 2021. "Effects of Incorporating Augmented Reality into a Board Game for High School Students’ Learning Motivation and Acceptance in Health Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Rebecca Yvonne Bayeck, 2020. "Examining Board Gameplay and Learning: A Multidisciplinary Review of Recent Research," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(4), pages 411-431, August.
    5. Martín Bascopé & Paolo Perasso & Kristina Reiss, 2019. "Systematic Review of Education for Sustainable Development at an Early Stage: Cornerstones and Pedagogical Approaches for Teacher Professional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Xaro Benavent & Esther de Ves & Anabel Forte & Carmen Botella-Mascarell & Emilia López-Iñesta & Silvia Rueda & Sandra Roger & Joaquin Perez & Cristina Portalés & Esther Dura & Daniel Garcia-Costa & Pa, 2020. "Girls4STEM: Gender Diversity in STEM for a Sustainable Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Li-Ching Hung & Hsiang-Ju Pan, 2025. "Innovative Approach to ESD Integration into School-Based Curriculum Development Modules for Elementary Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-26, February.
    8. Marylène Gagné & Rebecca Hewett, 2025. "Assumptions about Human Motivation have Consequences for Practice," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(5), pages 2098-2124, July.
    9. Luis Miguel Fonseca & José Pedro Domingues & Alina Mihaela Dima, 2020. "Mapping the Sustainable Development Goals Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Wendy James & Grainne Oates & Nikki Schonfeldt, 2025. "Improving retention while enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes using gamified mobile technology," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 366-386, May.
    11. Teresa Monte & Pedro Reis, 2021. "Design of a Pedagogical Model of Education for Environmental Citizenship in Primary Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shahreena Daud & Zarinah Abu Yazid & Norraeffa Md Taib & Mohd Zailani Othman & Idris Osman, 2024. "Evaluating the Impact of Usability Components on User Satisfaction in Educational Board Games using the MEEGA+ Framework," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(2), pages 195-206.
    2. Jorrit Holst & Mandy Singer‐Brodowski & Antje Brock & Gerhard de Haan, 2024. "Monitoring SDG 4.7: Assessing Education for Sustainable Development in policies, curricula, training of educators and student assessment (input‐indicator)," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3908-3923, August.
    3. Savas Pamuk & Rıdvan Elmas & Yakup Saban, 2022. "A Modeling Study on Science Teachers’ Sustainable Development Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Wirapong Chansanam & Chunqiu Li, 2022. "Scientometrics of Poverty Research for Sustainability Development: Trend Analysis of the 1964–2022 Data through Scopus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Luis Fonseca & Vitor Silva & José Carlos Sá & Vanda Lima & Gilberto Santos & Rui Silva, 2022. "B Corp versus ISO 9001 and 14001 certifications: Aligned, or alternative paths, towards sustainable development?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 496-508, May.
    6. Lingyan Meng & Md Qamruzzaman & Anass Hamad Elneel Adow, 2021. "Technological Adaption and Open Innovation in SMEs: An Strategic Assessment for Women-Owned SMEs Sustainability in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Alisha Ralph & Akarsh Arora, 2024. "Mapping the literature on decent work: A bibliometric analysis of sustainable development goal 8," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3937-3952, August.
    8. Jorge Rojo-Ramos & Fernando Manzano-Redondo & Sabina Barrios-Fernandez & Miguel Angel García-Gordillo & José Carmelo Adsuar, 2021. "Early Childhood Education Teachers’ Perception of Outdoor Learning Activities in the Spanish Region of Extremadura," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-12, August.
    9. Ramos, Maria Priscila & Custodio, Estefania & Jiménez, Sofía & Sartori, Martina & Ferrari, Emanuele, 2022. "Enhancing labour productivity by improving nutrition in Kenya: micro-econometric estimates for dynamic CGE model calibration," Conference papers 333426, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    10. Patrick Klein & Bastian Popp, 2022. "Last-Mile Delivery Methods in E-Commerce: Does Perceived Sustainability Matter for Consumer Acceptance and Usage?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    11. Antonella Cammarelle & Mariarosaria Lombardi & Rosaria Viscecchia, 2021. "Packaging Innovations to Reduce Food Loss and Waste: Are Italian Manufacturers Willing to Invest?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Nguyen Hong Duc & Pankaj Kumar & Pham Phuong Lan & Tonni Agustiono Kurniawan & Khaled Mohamed Khedher & Ali Kharrazi & Osamu Saito & Ram Avtar, 2023. "Hydrochemical indices as a proxy for assessing land-use impacts on water resources: a sustainable management perspective and case study of Can Tho City, Vietnam," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 2573-2615, July.
    13. Henrique Oliveira & Víctor Moutinho, 2021. "Renewable Energy, Economic Growth and Economic Development Nexus: A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, July.
    14. Arantza Rico & Elena Agirre-Basurko & Aritz Ruiz-González & Igone Palacios-Agundez & Daniel Zuazagoitia, 2021. "Integrating Mathematics and Science Teaching in the Context of Education for Sustainable Development: Design and Pilot Implementation of a Teaching-Learning Sequence about Air Quality with Pre-Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    15. Lachlan Curmi & Kumudu Kaushalya Weththasinghe & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq, 2022. "Global Policy Review on Embodied Flows: Recommendations for Australian Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Alem Desta Wuneh & Afework Mulugeta Bezabih & Yemisrach Behailu Okwaraji & Lars Åke Persson & Araya Abrha Medhanyie, 2022. "Wealth and Education Inequities in Maternal and Child Health Services Utilization in Rural Ethiopia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-12, April.
    17. Teresa Galanti, 2021. "Risk Management and Learning Climate in Emergency Contexts: A Qualitative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    18. Hossin, Md. Altab & Abudu, Hermas & Katsekpor, Johnson & Lei, Mu & Botah, Elvis Banoemuleng, 2025. "Tracking sustainable energy indicators in Africa: New evidence from technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    19. Rajeev Ravindran & Kwame Donkor & Lalitha Gottumukkala & Abhay Menon & Amita Jacob Guneratnam & Helena McMahon & Sybrandus Koopmans & Johan P. M. Sanders & James Gaffey, 2022. "Biogas, Biomethane and Digestate Potential of By-Products from Green Biorefinery Systems," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Shih-Yeh Chen & Shiang-Yao Liu, 2020. "Developing Students’ Action Competence for a Sustainable Future: A Review of Educational Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6775-:d:1709937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.