IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6341-d1698972.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative Materials for Interior Partitions in Construction

Author

Listed:
  • Bruna Resende Fagundes Pereira

    (Department of Forest Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Campus Universitário, Lavras 37203-202, MG, Brazil)

  • Carolina Rezende Pinto Narciso

    (Department of Forest Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Campus Universitário, Lavras 37203-202, MG, Brazil)

  • Gustavo Henrique Nalon

    (Department of Applied and Computational Mechanics, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Rua José Lourenço Kelmer, São Pedro, Juiz de Fora 36036-330, MG, Brazil)

  • Juliana Farinassi Mendes

    (Embrapa Instrumentation, Centro, São Carlos 13560-970, SP, Brazil)

  • Lívia Elisabeth Vasconcellos de Siqueira Brandão Vaz

    (Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Federal University of Lavras, Campus Universitário, Lavras 37203-202, MG, Brazil)

  • Raphael Nogueira Rezende

    (Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Federal University of Lavras, Campus Universitário, Lavras 37203-202, MG, Brazil)

  • Rafael Farinassi Mendes

    (Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Federal University of Lavras, Campus Universitário, Lavras 37203-202, MG, Brazil)

Abstract

The significant waste generated by construction has increased interest in sustainable solutions, including prefabricated interior partition panels. Although different types of alternative panels have been proposed, their performance as interior partitions remains underexplored in systematic comparative studies. To narrow this knowledge gap, this paper presents a comprehensive evaluation and classification of drywall, OSB (Oriented Strand Board), cement–wood, and honeycomb panels, regarding physical, mechanical, microstructural, thermal, acoustic, and combustibility characteristics, in addition to conducting a cost evaluation. The results indicated that the OSB panels exhibited superior results for interior partition applications, showing notable advantages in physical strength, mechanical performance, and thermal insulation, while offering acoustic properties comparable to those of drywall panels. Nevertheless, OSB panels showed lower fire resistance and were associated with the highest cost among the materials analyzed in the present research. Drywall panels, on the other hand, provided the most favorable fire resistance but exhibited the least effective thermal insulation. The findings also indicated that both wood–cement and honeycomb panels require further improvements in their manufacturing processes to meet performance standards suitable for interior partition.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruna Resende Fagundes Pereira & Carolina Rezende Pinto Narciso & Gustavo Henrique Nalon & Juliana Farinassi Mendes & Lívia Elisabeth Vasconcellos de Siqueira Brandão Vaz & Raphael Nogueira Rezende & , 2025. "Alternative Materials for Interior Partitions in Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-24, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6341-:d:1698972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6341/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6341/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6341-:d:1698972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.