IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6327-d1698690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the Freight Transportation System in the Context of the Country’s Economic Development

Author

Listed:
  • Veslav Kuranovič

    (Department of Logistics and Transport Management, Faculty of Transport Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 10105 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Leonas Ustinovichius

    (Faculty of Engineering Management, Bialystok University of Technology, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)

  • Maciej Nowak

    (Faculty of Informatics and Communication, University of Economics in Katowice, 40-287 Katowice, Poland)

  • Darius Bazaras

    (Department of Logistics and Transport Management, Faculty of Transport Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 10105 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Edgar Sokolovskij

    (Department of Automobile Engineering, Faculty of Transport Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 10105 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Due to the recent significant increase in the scale of both domestic and international cargo transportation, the transport sector is becoming an important factor in the country’s economic development. This implies the need to improve all links in the cargo transportation chain. A key role in it is played by logistics centers, which in their activities must meet both state (CO 2 emissions, reduction in road load, increase in transportation safety, etc.) and commercial (cargo transportation in the shortest time and at the lowest cost) requirements. The objective of the paper is freight transportation from China to European countries, reflecting issues of CO 2 emissions, reduction in road load, and increase in transportation safety. Transport operations from the manufacturer to the logistics center are especially important in this chain, since the efficiency of transportation largely depends on the decisions made by its employees. They select the appropriate types of transport (air, sea, rail, and road transport) and routes for a specific situation. In methodology, the analyzed problem can be presented as a dynamic multi-criteria decision model. It is assumed that the decision-maker—the manager responsible for planning transportation operations—is interested in achieving three basic goals: financial goal minimizing total delivery costs from factories to the logistics center, environmental goal minimizing the negative impact of supply chain operations on the environment, and high level of customer service goal minimizing delivery times from factories to the logistics center. The proposed methodology allows one to reduce the total carbon dioxide emission by 1.1 percent and the average duration of cargo transportation by 1.47 percent. On the other hand, the total cost of their delivery increases by 1.25 percent. By combining these, it is possible to create optimal transportation options, effectively use vehicles, reduce air pollution, and increase the quality of customer service. All this would significantly contribute to the country’s socio-economic development. It is proposed to solve this complex problem based on a dynamic multi-criteria model. In this paper, the problem of constructing a schedule of transport operations from factories to a logistics center is considered. The analyzed problem can be presented as a dynamic multi-criteria decision model. Linear programming and the AHP method were used to solve it.

Suggested Citation

  • Veslav Kuranovič & Leonas Ustinovichius & Maciej Nowak & Darius Bazaras & Edgar Sokolovskij, 2025. "Improving the Freight Transportation System in the Context of the Country’s Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6327-:d:1698690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6327/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6327/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fahimnia, Behnam & Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Sarkis, Joseph, 2018. "Greening versus resilience: A supply chain design perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 129-148.
    2. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.
    3. Archetti, Claudia & Peirano, Lorenzo & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2022. "Optimization in multimodal freight transportation problems: A Survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 1-20.
    4. Taotao Deng, 2013. "Impacts of Transport Infrastructure on Productivity and Economic Growth: Recent Advances and Research Challenges," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 686-699, November.
    5. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    6. Divya Choudhary & Ravi Shankar & Alok Choudhary, 2020. "An Integrated Approach for Modeling Sustainability Risks in Freight Transportation Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 858-883, April.
    7. Fulzele, Vijayta & Shankar, Ravi, 2022. "Improving freight transportation performance through sustainability best practices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 285-299.
    8. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2011. "Selection of supply portfolio under disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 194-208, April.
    9. Yousaf Ali & Claudio Socci & Rosita Pretaroli & Francesca Severini, 2018. "Economic and environmental impact of transport sector on Europe economy," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 361-397, August.
    10. Saidi, Samir & Mani, Venkatesh & Mefteh, Haifa & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Akhtar, Pervaiz, 2020. "Dynamic linkages between transport, logistics, foreign direct Investment, and economic growth: Empirical evidence from developing countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 277-293.
    11. Chen, Hongwen & Cheng, Ken & Zhang, Meiyang, 2023. "Does geographic proximity affect firms’ cross-regional development? Evidence from high-speed rail construction in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    12. Krajnc, Damjan & Glavič, Peter, 2005. "A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 189-208.
    13. Dominik Wittenberg & Anne Paschke & Andre Kukuk & Jürgen Pannek, 2024. "Information Requirements and Legal Framework for Multimodal Transport System Coordination," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Rocio de la Torre & Canan G. Corlu & Javier Faulin & Bhakti S. Onggo & Angel A. Juan, 2021. "Simulation, Optimization, and Machine Learning in Sustainable Transportation Systems: Models and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdolreza Roshani & Philip Walker-Davies & Glenn Parry, 2024. "Designing resilient supply chain networks: a systematic literature review of mitigation strategies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(2), pages 1267-1332, October.
    2. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 285-307.
    3. Ivanov, Dmitry, 2020. "Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: A simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) case," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    4. Mao Zheng & Ningning Cui & Yibin Zhang & Fangfang Zhang & Victor Shi, 2023. "Inventory Policies and Supply Chain Coordination under Logistics Route Disruption Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Li, Yongjian & Zhen, Xueping & Qi, Xiangtong & Cai, Gangshu (George), 2016. "Penalty and financial assistance in a supply chain with supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 167-181.
    6. Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1411-1431, December.
    7. Heckmann, Iris & Comes, Tina & Nickel, Stefan, 2015. "A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 119-132.
    8. Pritee Ray & Mamata Jenamani, 2016. "Sourcing decision under disruption risk with supply and demand uncertainty: A newsvendor approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 237-262, February.
    9. Pritee Ray & Mamata Jenamani, 2016. "Sourcing decision under disruption risk with supply and demand uncertainty: A newsvendor approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 237-262, February.
    10. Hong, Yoo Suk & Huh, Woonghee Tim & Kang, Changmuk, 2017. "Sourcing assemble-to-order inventories under supplier risk uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PA), pages 1-14.
    11. Clemons, Rebecca & Slotnick, Susan A., 2016. "The effect of supply-chain disruption, quality and knowledge transfer on firm strategy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 169-186.
    12. Rahiminia, Shahab & Mehrabi, Amir & Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Aghaee, Mohsen Pourseyed, 2025. "A hybrid optimization approach for designing sustainable intermodal freight transport under mixed uncertainty," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    13. Bodendorf, Frank & Sauter, Maximilian & Franke, Jörg, 2023. "A mixed methods approach to analyze and predict supply disruptions by combining causal inference and deep learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    14. Aldrighetti, Riccardo & Battini, Daria & Ivanov, Dmitry & Zennaro, Ilenia, 2021. "Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: A review and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    15. Jie Wu & Zhixin Chen & Xiang Ji, 2020. "Sustainable trade promotion decisions under demand disruption in manufacturer-retailer supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 115-143, July.
    16. Tang, Liang & Jing, Ke & He, Jie & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2016. "Robustness of assembly supply chain networks by considering risk propagation and cascading failure," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 459(C), pages 129-139.
    17. Preetam Basu & Soumita Ghosh & Milan Kumar, 2019. "Supplier ratings and dynamic sourcing strategies to mitigate supply disruption risks," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 46(1), pages 41-57, March.
    18. Konstantinos Liagkouras & Konstantinos Metaxiotis, 2023. "Sources of Uncertainty and Risk Quantification Methods in Supply Chain Management: A Literature Study," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 1-42, December.
    19. Cheong, Taesu & Song, Sang Hwa, 2013. "The value of information on supply risk under random yields," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 27-38.
    20. Ranveer Singh Rana & Dinesh Kumar & Kanika Prasad & K. Mathiyazhagan, 2024. "Mitigating the impact of demand disruption on perishable inventory in a two-warehouse system," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 469-504, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6327-:d:1698690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.