IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6312-d1698281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Shocks to the Grazing Land Footprint Permanent or Transitory? Evidence from a Machine Learning-Based Unit Root Test

Author

Listed:
  • Veli Yilanci

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Political Sciences, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale 17100, Türkiye)

  • Onder Ozgur

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Political Sciences, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara 06760, Türkiye)

  • Merve Mert Saritas

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Political Sciences, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale 17100, Türkiye)

Abstract

Understanding the dynamic behavior of the grazing land footprint (GLF) is critical for sustainable land management. This study examines the GLF in 92 countries to determine if the series is stationary, a statistical property indicating that shocks have transitory effects, or non-stationary, which implies that shocks have permanent, cumulative impacts (a phenomenon known as persistence). We employ a novel machine learning framework that uses an XGBoost algorithm to synthesize information from multiple conventional tests and time-series characteristics, enhancing analytical robustness. The results reveal significant cross-country heterogeneity. The GLF exhibits stationary behavior in a subset of nations, including China, India, and Norway, suggesting that their ecosystems can absorb shocks. However, for most countries, the GLF is non-stationary, indicating that ecological disruptions have lasting and cumulative impacts. These findings underscore that a one-size-fits-all policy approach is inadequate. Nations with a stationary GLF may find short-term interventions effective, whereas those with non-stationary series require profound structural reforms to mitigate long-term degradation. This highlights the critical role of advanced methodologies in shaping evidence-based environmental policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Veli Yilanci & Onder Ozgur & Merve Mert Saritas, 2025. "Are Shocks to the Grazing Land Footprint Permanent or Transitory? Evidence from a Machine Learning-Based Unit Root Test," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6312-:d:1698281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6312/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6312/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wassie Berhanu & David Colman & Bichaka Fayissa, 2007. "Diversification and livelihood sustainability in a semi-arid environment: A case study from southern Ethiopia," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 871-889.
    2. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2008. "New evidence on the convergence of per capita carbon dioxide emissions from panel seemingly unrelated regressions augmented Dickey–Fuller tests," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1468-1475.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mishra, Vinod & Smyth, Russell, 2014. "Convergence in energy consumption per capita among ASEAN countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 180-185.
    2. Presno, María José & Landajo, Manuel & Fernández González, Paula, 2018. "Stochastic convergence in per capita CO2 emissions. An approach from nonlinear stationarity analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 563-581.
    3. Diogo Ferraz & Fernanda P. S. Falguera & Enzo B. Mariano & Dominik Hartmann, 2021. "Linking Economic Complexity, Diversification, and Industrial Policy with Sustainable Development: A Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    4. Caglar, Abdullah Emre & Daştan, Muhammet & Avci, Salih Bortecine, 2024. "Persistence of disaggregate energy RD&D expenditures in top-five economies: Evidence from artificial neural network approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    5. Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Bogdan Klepacki & Lisa Holden & Tomasz Rokicki & Andrzej Parzonko, 2024. "Changes in Gross Nuclear Electricity Production in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-31, July.
    6. Edy Yusuf Agung Gunanto & Tri Wahyu & Jaka Aminata & Banatul Hayati, 2021. "Convergence CO2 Emission in ASEAN Countries: Augmented Green Solow Model Approach," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(5), pages 572-578.
    7. Yu-Chen Zhang & Deng-Kui Si & Bing Zhao, 2020. "The Convergence of Sulphur Dioxide (SO 2 ) Emissions Per Capita in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-33, February.
    8. Wassie Berhanu & Fekadu Beyene, 2015. "Climate Variability and Household Adaptation Strategies in Southern Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Diego Romero-Ávila & Tolga Omay, 2023. "Convergence of GHGs emissions in the long-run: aerosol precursors, reactive gases and aerosols—a nonlinear panel approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12303-12337, November.
    10. Shiwei Yu & Xing Hu & Xuejiao Zhang & Zhenxi Li, 2019. "Convergence of per capita carbon emissions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Energy & Environment, , vol. 30(5), pages 776-799, August.
    11. Akram, Vaseem & Ali, Jabir, 2022. "Do countries converge in natural resources rents? Evidence from club convergence analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    12. Riithi, Alexander Njuguna & Irungu, Patrick & Munei , Kimpei, 2015. "Determinants Of Choice Of Alternative Livelihood Diversification Strategies In Solio Resettlement Scheme, Kenya," Dissertations and Theses 269714, University of Nairobi, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    13. Berhe, Melaku & Hoag, Dana & Tesfay, Girmay & Oniki, Shunji & Kagatsume, Masaru, 2016. "Effects of adaptation to climate change on income of cattle owners in the pastoral and agro-pastoral communities of Northern Ethiopia," 2016 Fifth International Conference, September 23-26, 2016, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 246974, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    14. Mishra, Vinod & Smyth, Russell, 2017. "Conditional convergence in Australia's energy consumption at the sector level," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 396-403.
    15. James E. Payne & Stephanie Miller & Junsoo Lee & Myeong Hyeon Cho, 2014. "Convergence of per capita sulphur dioxide emissions across US states," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(11), pages 1202-1211, April.
    16. Mulwa, Chalmers K. & Visser, Martine, 2020. "Farm diversification as an adaptation strategy to climatic shocks and implications for food security in northern Namibia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    17. Feng Dong & Ruyin Long & Hong Chen & Xiaohui Li & Qingliang Yang, 2013. "Factors Affecting Regional Per-Capita Carbon Emissions in China Based on an LMDI Factor Decomposition Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-10, December.
    18. Yanan Chen & Sheng Lin, 2015. "Study on factors affecting energy-related per capita carbon dioxide emission by multi-sectoral of cities: a case study of Tianjin," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 77(2), pages 833-846, June.
    19. Solomon Zena Walelign & Mariève Pouliot & Helle Overgaard Larsen & Carsten Smith-Hall, 2015. "A novel approach to dynamic livelihood clustering: Empirical evidence from Nepal," IFRO Working Paper 2015/09, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    20. Mariam Camarero & Yurena Mendoza & Javier Ordóñez, 2011. "Re-examining CO2 emissions. Is the assessment of convergence meaningless?," Working Papers 2011/06, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6312-:d:1698281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.